Switch Theme:

Tyrannocyte & WebWay Gate getting the Drop Pod treatment  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Dallas area, TX

So Drop Pods got an exception to the Match Play Tactical Reserves limit. I feel like the Tyrannocyte (Nid Drop Pod) and Webway gate should also receive this exception.

Thoughts?

-

   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Yeah I'm fine with the Tyranids getting that. Webway Gate the Strat? Absolutely not.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Yeah I'm fine with the Tyranids getting that. Webway Gate the Strat? Absolutely not.


Pretty sure we're talking about the actual Webway Gate model, not one of the Webway Strike/Assault/Ambush strats.

Tyrannocytes getting turn 1 deepstrike is probably fine. The same screening tactics that were important prior to the reserve rule changes would become important again, but 'nid players would be investing in a pretty costly model to put on turn 1 pressure. I can't think of any 'nid units that would break the game by landing on turn 1 instead of turn 2. They don't have a lot of crippling short-ranged dakka. THey'd basically just be throwing a very killable problem unit in your face turn 1 that you'd have to take care of rather than shooting/advancing downfield right off the bat. It's a speedbump delivery, basically.

I'm of the opinion that the webway gate is literally the worst unit in the game right now. Letting units come out of it on turn 1 would make it significantly less bad, but still leave it pretty bad. I feel like the webway gate might need a more thorough overhaul. The biggest issue with the webway is that it actively becomes a liability if you go second. Your opponent might blow it up immediately (at which point you can only salvage a single unit from it, and that only if you have a harlequin detachment to grant access to the right stratagem). Charging the gate allows your opponent to use it as a sort of movement booster for his units. Getting close to the gate but not destroying it can functionally prevent the gate's contents from ever entering play. Unfortunate terrain placement combined with the gate's rules can make it really tricky to put the gate in a useful position in the first place.

And on top of that, most units that might consider using the gate (i.e. anything without built-in deepstrike) is probably better off using a stratagem. A blob of guardians, for instance, can be really tricky to place usefully using a gate. The gate and the enemy would have to be placed such that the guardians are legally far enough away from the enemy, legally close enough to the game, and still within 12" for their shuriken catapults to be brought to bear. Melee units would have a long bomb charge to make. Short-ranged shooting units have guardian problems. Long-ranged shooting units don't really need the gate in the first place. The only situations where a gate seems like it has a use are:

A.) You want to deepstrike a ton of stuff without built-in deepstrike, and you don't want to spend a ton of CP to do it. The thing here is that you'd be bringing those units in one at a time through a single gate, so you're presumably only bringing in three or less units in this fashion. At which point, spending a couple CP to just webway strat them onto the table is probably better. You can speed up the rate at which units arrive by taking more webways and/or using the harlequin strat, but then you're investing a ton of points and a moderate number of CP into a gimmick whose only purpose is spending a ton of CP. Plus, you're only allowed to put so much of your army into deepstrike in the first place, so chances are good that the webway strats will be a more efficient way of pulling off mass deepstriking.

B.) Monsters. Monsters can't currently deepstrike via the webway, cloudstrike, screaming jet, etc. strats. So you can have some talos or wraith lords or an avatar show up through the gate. Talos might actually be tempted by this approach if you happen to be fielding harlies (so that your opponent doesn't just turn 1 kill or lock up the gate thus trapping your talos squad), but they'd all still be stuck making long charges. I guess coming out turn 1 if you get the top of turn would let you turn a wraith lord into a distraction carnifex?

Personally, I lean towards treating webway gates less like a deepstrike pad and more like a vehicle with an unlimited transport capacity shared between all gates you control. This would allow you to potentially disembark from the gate even if enemies were nearby (as long as they weren't completely swarming the gate), and other units could move after disembarking thus turning the portal into a sort of launch pad. I wouldn't mind advancing some fire dragons or howling banshees or harlies or incubi out of a portal if the rules would let me; as is, the portal is just a much riskier and more limited form of deepstrike.


ATTENTION
. Psychic tests are unfluffy. Your longing for AV is understandable but misguided. Your chapter doesn't need a separate codex. Doctrines should go away. Being a "troop" means nothing. This has been a cranky service announcement. You may now resume your regularly scheduled arguing.
 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Dallas area, TX

Wyldhunt wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Yeah I'm fine with the Tyranids getting that. Webway Gate the Strat? Absolutely not.


Pretty sure we're talking about the actual Webway Gate model, not one of the Webway Strike/Assault/Ambush strats.
Yes, I am talking about the MODEL, not the Strat. You are paying the points for the model AND spending a detachment for it, you should be able to use it from Turn 1. It only brings on 1 unit per turn anyway

There are other problems with the WWG as you mention, but adding the exception for Matched play would alleviate some of those issue (and potentially make WKs more appealing as a side effect)

-

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/09/26 16:04:59


   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





 Galef wrote:
Wyldhunt wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Yeah I'm fine with the Tyranids getting that. Webway Gate the Strat? Absolutely not.


Pretty sure we're talking about the actual Webway Gate model, not one of the Webway Strike/Assault/Ambush strats.
Yes, I am talking about the MODEL, not the Strat. You are paying the points for the model AND spending a detachment for it, you should be able to use it from Turn 1. It only brings on 1 unit per turn anyway

There are other problems with the WWG as you mention, but adding the exception for Matched play would alleviate some of those issue (and potentially make WKs more appealing as a side effect)

-


It definitely wouldn't break the game to let units arrive from gates turn 1. I'm just not sure if it would be a big enough buff to really make them viable either. They'd be less of a liability at friendly league nights!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/09/27 04:30:10



ATTENTION
. Psychic tests are unfluffy. Your longing for AV is understandable but misguided. Your chapter doesn't need a separate codex. Doctrines should go away. Being a "troop" means nothing. This has been a cranky service announcement. You may now resume your regularly scheduled arguing.
 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Dallas area, TX

Kinda disappointed the WWG didn't get updated with Rise of the Phoenix. It would have been the ideal place to include it for DE & CWE (since currently you only get the WWG related stratagems with HARLEQUIN detachments).
It would have also been the ideal place to give it the same Matched Play rules that Drop Pods have (i.e. make units coming out of the WWG no count for against the Match Play restriction). And maybe drop it to an even 100pts

It can only bring in 1 unit per turn anyway, so it should be allowed to be used turn 1. It's not much, but it can certainly make WKs usable.

-

   
Made in us
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon






 Galef wrote:
Kinda disappointed the WWG didn't get updated with Rise of the Phoenix. It would have been the ideal place to include it for DE & CWE (since currently you only get the WWG related stratagems with HARLEQUIN detachments).
It would have also been the ideal place to give it the same Matched Play rules that Drop Pods have (i.e. make units coming out of the WWG no count for against the Match Play restriction). And maybe drop it to an even 100pts

It can only bring in 1 unit per turn anyway, so it should be allowed to be used turn 1. It's not much, but it can certainly make WKs usable.

-
A mechanic/model that provides immunity to alpha strike against a titan equivalent should not be allowed to DS turn 1, no matter how "least-titan-y" WK may be.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/10/29 15:44:04


 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Dallas area, TX

 skchsan wrote:
 Galef wrote:
Kinda disappointed the WWG didn't get updated with Rise of the Phoenix. It would have been the ideal place to include it for DE & CWE (since currently you only get the WWG related stratagems with HARLEQUIN detachments).
It would have also been the ideal place to give it the same Matched Play rules that Drop Pods have (i.e. make units coming out of the WWG no count for against the Match Play restriction). And maybe drop it to an even 100pts

It can only bring in 1 unit per turn anyway, so it should be allowed to be used turn 1. It's not much, but it can certainly make WKs usable.

-
A mechanic/model that provides immunity to alpha strike against a titan equivalent should not be allowed to DS turn 1, no matter how "least-titan-y" WK may be.
This is an opinion I do not share in this particular case. Because you are adding yet more points to an already over coasted WK and it isn't true immunity.
The WWG can still be destroyed turn 1 before the WK comes in, thus forcing CPs to be used to immediately bring it in (or else the WK is destroyed as a result) and then the WK can be shot at be the rest of the opponents army.

If it was true immunity, I'd agree with you, but it is far from it.

-

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/10/29 16:08:13


   
Made in us
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon






 Galef wrote:
 skchsan wrote:
 Galef wrote:
Kinda disappointed the WWG didn't get updated with Rise of the Phoenix. It would have been the ideal place to include it for DE & CWE (since currently you only get the WWG related stratagems with HARLEQUIN detachments).
It would have also been the ideal place to give it the same Matched Play rules that Drop Pods have (i.e. make units coming out of the WWG no count for against the Match Play restriction). And maybe drop it to an even 100pts

It can only bring in 1 unit per turn anyway, so it should be allowed to be used turn 1. It's not much, but it can certainly make WKs usable.

-
A mechanic/model that provides immunity to alpha strike against a titan equivalent should not be allowed to DS turn 1, no matter how "least-titan-y" WK may be.
This is an opinion I do not share in this particular case. Because you are adding yet more points to an already over coasted WK and it isn't true immunity.
The WWG can still be destroyed turn 1 before the WK comes in, thus forcing CPs to be used to immediately bring it in (or else the WK is destroyed as a result) and then the WK can be shot at be the rest of the opponents army.

If it was true immunity, I'd agree with you, but it is far from it.

-
I'd argue that's a balance issue and not that of a game mechanic.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




My bad. I even forgot it was a model because if how bad it is.

Yeah I'm good with the model doing T1 deliveries.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: