Switch Theme:

Lightning Fast Reflexes and Targeting  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Nurgle Chosen Marine on a Palanquin





Livermore, Ca

I'm using a unit of havocs. Per the rules primer I declare that I'm using my havocs and that I'm targeting two different eldar flyers. My opponent wants me to declare my acutal guns and how many are going where before he uses lightning fast reflexes. I think that wrong because his stratagem says something like after an aeldari unit has been targeted, it can be used. I've followed step 2, I've targetted the units. I'm waiting for him to use or not use the stratgem before going to Step 3.

Do I have it right or am I missing something?
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

Rulebook FAQ:

Page 179 – Choose Ranged Weapons
Change the last sentence of the first paragraph to read: ‘In either case, at the same time that you choose targets for the shooting unit’s attacks, you must declare how you will split the shooting unit’s shots; then resolve all the shots against one target before moving on to the next

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon






As above. You must declare which weapons are being fired at which targets.
   
Made in de
Longtime Dakkanaut




Your version was correct some 2 years ago, yes.

They FAQed it a while ago because people were abusing it this way, making things like Lightning Fast Reflexes, Rotate Ion Shields, etc.. near-useless.

Got to declare which guns go where now.
   
Made in de
Nihilistic Necron Lord






Germany

People didnt abuse it. They played RAW, it was GW who screwed up the rules (as usual) in the first place. The change is stupid. In step 3 the rules tell you you must declare how you split fire in step 2. But you already moved past step 2. Thats ridiculous.

1. Choose unit to shoot with
2. Choose targets
3. Choose ranged weapon

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/03/10 16:57:20


 
   
Made in gb
Walking Dead Wraithlord






Seems logical when you declare target /split fire you say how you splitting said fire... otherwise id declare a unit of say 10 intercessors against 2 different units, you use stragemem x to improve survivability on one unit.

So then I go "aaaaha! i see your strategem and now i put 9 shots into a unit you havent used a strat on and 1 into the one you have made more survivable. Gotcha!!"

https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/772746.page#10378083 - My progress/failblog painting blog thingy

Eldar- 4436 pts


AngryAngel80 wrote:
I don't know, when I see awesome rules, I'm like " Baby, your rules looking so fine. Maybe I gotta add you to my first strike battalion eh ? "


 Eonfuzz wrote:


I would much rather everyone have a half ass than no ass.


"A warrior does not seek fame and honour. They come to him as he humbly follows his path"  
   
Made in de
Nihilistic Necron Lord






Germany

Yes, its logical, but GW didnt do it that way. The rule change is in step 3, choose ranged weapon. At that point you are past choosing targets, which is step 2. They should have changed step 2, choose targets.
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

What point is there in arguing over pre-FAQ wording?

It’s clear now. Move on.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: