<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/15.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ From the best drop pod list thread:<br />  <br />  <div   >Durandal wrote:<br />  <br />  Wolves still get their pods for free, so you don't lose points by going that route.</div  ><br />  <br />  This assertion was made in the thread, countered, but not really discussed.&nbsp; After it piquing my interest, I looked over the relevant text...<br />  <br />  <div   >Space Wolves Codex, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(329);'>pg</span>. 4<br />  <br />  <b>Drop Pods.</b>&nbsp; At the start of a battle where you can use the <i>Deep Strike</i> rules, you can declare that your Space Wolves are deploying by ... drop pods ... Models doing this deploy using the <i>Deep Strike</i> rules ... Only the following can deploy from drop pods.&nbsp; No other rmodels in the army can be used in this mission</div  ><br />  <br />  <div   >Space Wolves <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> (emphasis mine)<br />  <br />  these notes should provide you with the rules <i>clarifications</i> you need to play games</div  ><br />  <br />  <div   >Space Wolves <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span><br />  <br />  <b>Drop Pods.</b> Use the rules for Drop Pod Assault on p.21 of <i>Codex: Space Marines</i></div  ><br />  <br />  So, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> gives a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> general access to the Drop Pod Assault rule.<br />  <br />  The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> Drop Pods rule lets you declare at game time that your army is arriving via pods, if <i>Deep Strike</i> is in play.&nbsp; The clarification for the rule says to use Drop Pod Assault.<br />  <br />  So, if I have a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> army, and <i>Deep Strike</i> is in play, I declare they're coming in on drop pods... do I get free pods?<br />  <br />  Note 1: To me this is a case of odd and inderminate rules writing, as the rules in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> <i>clarify</i> as opposed to <i>replace</i> the mentioned rules in the Codex.<br />  <br />  Note 2: Even if it's viable, it would only be useful if you could guarantee <i>Deep Strike</i>, as otherwise to get any point benefit, you end up with a lot of 6&quot;/6&quot; models deploying as normal infantry if at any time <i>Deep Strike</i> isn't available.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153363.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153363.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:03:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lowinor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Lowinor on 04/03/2007 7:03 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  From the best drop pod list thread:<br />  <br />  <blockquote><div><cite>Durandal wrote:</cite>Wolves still get their pods for free, so you don't lose points by going that route.</div  ><br />  <br />  This assertion was made in the thread, countered, but not really discussed.&nbsp; After it piquing my interest, I looked over the relevant text...<br />  <br />  <blockquote><div><cite>Space Wolves Codex, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(329);'>pg</span>. 4 wrote:</cite><b>Drop Pods.</b>&nbsp; At the start of a battle where you can use the <i>Deep Strike</i> rules, you can declare that your Space Wolves are deploying by ... drop pods ... Models doing this deploy using the <i>Deep Strike</i> rules ... Only the following can deploy from drop pods.&nbsp; No other rmodels in the army can be used in this mission</div  ><br />  <br />  <blockquote><div><cite>Space Wolves <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> (emphasis mine) wrote:</cite>these notes should provide you with the rules <i>clarifications</i> you need to play games</div  ><br />  <br />  <blockquote><div><cite>Space Wolves <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> wrote:</cite><b>Drop Pods.</b> Use the rules for Drop Pod Assault on p.21 of <i>Codex: Space Marines</i></div  ><br />  <br />  So, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> gives a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> general access to the Drop Pod Assault rule.<br />  <br />  The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> Drop Pods rule lets you declare at game time that your army is arriving via pods, if <i>Deep Strike</i> is in play.&nbsp; The clarification for the rule says to use Drop Pod Assault.<br />  <br />  So, if I have a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> army, and <i>Deep Strike</i> is in play, I declare they're coming in on drop pods... do I get free pods?<br />  <br />  Note 1: To me this is a case of odd and inderminate rules writing, as the rules in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> <i>clarify</i> as opposed to <i>replace</i> the mentioned rules in the Codex.<br />  <br />  Note 2: Even if it's viable, it would only be useful if you could guarantee <i>Deep Strike</i>, as otherwise to get any point benefit, you end up with a lot of 6&quot;/6&quot; models deploying as normal infantry if at any time <i>Deep Strike</i> isn't available.<br />  </div></blockquote>  <p><font color="#ff0000">The Drop Pod Assault can be used whether or not Deep Strike is part of the mission. No you don't get free pods, as the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> to use the rules in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> book.</font></p>  <p><font color="#ff0000">C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(329);'>Pg</span> 21:</font></p>  <p><font color="#ff0000">&quot;.....(per the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>, this portion of the sentence is supplanted by the Space Wolves Codex, detailing which units may use a drop pod)... may be equipped with a drop pod <b><i>(see the transport entry for details). </i></b>If so they may not select any other transport option. <b><i>Such units remain in reserve and arrive by drop pod, even if the Mission being played does not normally allow Reserves or Deep Strike. </i></b>.....&quot;</font></p>  <p><font color="#ff0000">Emphasis mine.</font></p>  <p><font color="#ff0000">Referring to the entry for drop pods in C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>, you see that the pods cost&nbsp;<b>XX</b> points each, so you must pay the points to get them. </font></p>  <p><font color="#ff0000">The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> is NOT odd or indeterminate (for once). It CLEARLY says to use the rules found in C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>, with the only exeptions being those which are stated in the the&nbsp;very next sentence! <br />  </font><br />  </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153406.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153406.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:37:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lordhat]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's a clarification, not a replacement.  That's kinda the issue here -- what exactly is it clarifying?<br><br>I'd love to hear from Durandal about he plays this and/or the rules argument for it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153557.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153557.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 04:23:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lowinor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You pay for the drop pods like everyone else. Stop being such an arse about it.<br><br>- Greenie]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153577.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153577.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 05:15:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Green Bloater]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Green Bloater  on  04/04/2007 10:15 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  You pay for the drop pods like everyone else. Stop being such an arse about it.<br />  <br />  </div></blockquote>  <br />  Sweet irony.<br />  <br />  I pay for my pods as it is, and I don't really think using any of this is really reasonable just due to the lack of clarity of the whole thing.&nbsp; However, an <i>ad hominem</i> attack does not make an argument.<br />  <br />]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153608.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153608.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:14:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lowinor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Three cheers for a little common sense. Hip hip and all that bloody rot.<br><br>- Greenie]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153614.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153614.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:18:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Green Bloater]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ where does it say <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> have to pay for there pods?  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153663.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153663.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:26:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ beef]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Oh this is a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> thing. Sorry.<br><br>- Greenie]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153675.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153675.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:56:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Green Bloater]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Lowinor on 04/04/2007 9:23 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  It's a clarification, not a replacement. That's kinda the issue here -- what exactly is it clarifying?<br />  <br />  I'd love to hear from Durandal about he plays this and/or the rules argument for it.</div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  I don't understand where you get that it's a clarification. The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> CLEARLY says to use the rules in C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>. C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> CLEARLY says to look at the appropriate page for all the pertinent details on Drop Pods. Points cost is definitely a pertinent detail.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153752.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153752.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:35:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lordhat]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Agreed.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153795.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/153795.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Apr 2007 16:44:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've not played my wolves with the new rules.  Been too busy with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span> and now Eldar and I hadn't bothered to look at the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>.  Since Wolves don't get any of the new codex benefits such as Rites of Battle or Littanies of Hate, I assumed they still used their old mechanics for other things as well.  <br><br>That being said, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> simply states that space wolves use the drop pod rules in Codex Space Marines on P21.  Page 21 of C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> gives the new mechanics but does not require the wolves to pay the cost of the transport, it just references the unit entry.  According to the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>, only Land Speeder costs use the costs given in C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>.  Other examples of Wolves not paying the same cost as C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> are 75 vs 85 pts for Whirlwinds, 20pt <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(486);'>PW</span> weapon combat servitors and 5pts more for Vindicators.  I would make the argument that C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> still has the drop pod cost baked into the cost of your 18pt grey hunters and therefore they would get them for free.<br><br>I would prefer if <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> would just get off their duff and update C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span>, including 13th company there in.  There are too many holes, like a Wolf priest having Healing Potions and Fang of Morkai (Reductor/Narthecuim) to ignore the first "TWO" wounds his unit takes, the overcosted bikers, assault marines and undercosted whirlwinds, and the ability to master craft assault cannons and cyclone missile launchers on Wolf Guard Terminators.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154018.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154018.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:37:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Durandal]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ so free drop pods by what you are saying.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154027.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154027.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:54:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ beef]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <div   >look at the appropriate page for all the pertinent details on Drop Pods</div  >Let's follow the logic process here using <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span>.<br><br>The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> says use rules on C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>, page 21.  C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>, page 21 says see the transport entry for details.  What does the transport entry for Drop Pods say in the C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span>?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154041.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154041.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:32:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Breotan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yes, I think you could make the case for free drop pods for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span>, if only because <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> left it somewhat ambiguous in their text and they failed to cover all the bases when FAQing <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> to match the rules in C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>.  <br><br>I wouldn't push it hard.  If I were break out my wolves and use this tactic I would clarify it with my opponents first to avoid any trouble later.  This is clearly something where if you look at your opponents army while setting up and go "Oh, I'm drop podding all my infantry squads"  it will reflect poorly upon you.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154042.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154042.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:33:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Durandal]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>This is ridicilous... </p>  <p>The SW&nbsp; dex also says to see codex space marines for dreadnaughts. But it never mentions a price. Does that make the dread free? No. You use the&nbsp;price in the codex entry.</p>  <p>Same thing for pods....</p>  <p>The &quot;Clarification&quot; is for which wolves are able to use pods. The &quot;replacement&quot; is for the rules that detail how pods are used.</p>  <p>There is no argument to be made that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> get free pods. Unless you also agree they get the free dreads. </p>  <p>ender502</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154098.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154098.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:09:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ender502]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If it was as simple text as &quot;Troops: Blood Claws -&gt; Transport options: Drop Pod, See codex space marines&quot;  I would agree Ender.  While that probably was <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>'s intention why didn't they just say so?  Why &quot;See C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> p21&quot;  rather then &quot;Units may purchase a drop pod as a transport option, see C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> p21&quot;?  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154131.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154131.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:49:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Durandal]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think ender502 has hit the proverbial nail right on the head.<br><br>- Greenie]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154167.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154167.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:07:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Green Bloater]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Bloater and ender, you're missing the point -- at least, my argument, which is a bit different from Durandal's.<br><br>The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> drop pod rules say that you can, <i>at the start of a battle</i>, declare that <i>all</i> (valid) units in your army are arriving via drop pod.  The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> then, noting that it is specifically a <i>clarification</i>, to use the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> drop pod rules -- not to replace the drop pod rules.<br><br>So, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> codex gives you a time that is <i>after</i> list creation to declare that everything you've got that's poddable is arriving in pods.  Since it's after list creation, you can't pay points for the pods.  Basically, use the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> rules, and where it says "arrive by drop pod", use the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> codex drop pod rules instead of Deep Strike.<br><br>Again, not that I'm advocating anyone try this...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154194.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154194.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:17:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lowinor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's still a load of indefensible bullpucky.  You use the drop pod rules from codex: space marines.  Which include the points cost.  <br><br>There is absolutely no argument to be made for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> to get free drop pods.  Anyone who says differently is deluding themselves.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154215.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154215.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:48:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Lowinar-</p>  <p>I think I see where you are going wrong. There are no &quot;Space Wolf Drop pod rules.&quot; The original dex included these but they were supplanted in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> which states.... &quot;Use the rules for drop pod assault on P. 21 of Codex: Space Marines. Follow the Codex: Space Wolves list of models that can utilize drop pods.&quot;</p>  <p>&nbsp;You continue to try and use the Drop Pod rules from Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> but the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> clearly states you are in error. The only way your argument holds water is if you ignore the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>.</p>  <p>again...</p>  <p>&quot;Use the rules for drop pod assault on P. 21 of Codex: Space Marines. Follow the Codex: Space Wolves list of models that can utilize drop pods.&quot;</p>  <p>It is clear and unambigous.</p>  <p>ender502</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154285.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154285.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:18:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ender502]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yes, I'm not suggesting anyone try this, it's absurd.<br />  <br />  No one has made any real argument as to why it's not viable.&nbsp; It's never going to pass a &quot;least advantageous interpretation&quot;* test.&nbsp; No one should use it.<br />  <br />  The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> says to use the C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> rules, but use the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> rules for which units can take drop pods.&nbsp; The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> rules specify certain models <i>declared at battle start</i>.&nbsp; Using the standard interpretation (which, I should point out, <i>I use exclusively</i>) requires a leap of interpretation that, while reasonable, isn't in the rules themselves.&nbsp; The reader has to read more in to the rules than are actually printed -- and I'd argue that read in a vacuum without a history of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> game knoweldge, the standard interpretation isn't necessarily the most obvious reading.<br />  <br />  Remember, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> says to use the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> rules for podding itself and the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> list of models which can pod.&nbsp; The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> rules give a list of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> units which must be equipped with pods.&nbsp; The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> rules give a list of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> units which must be declared at battle start (if Deep Strike is in play).&nbsp; Of course, the next step in the line of argumentation is that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> units <i>can't</i> purchase pods and must rely on the battle-start declaration (only when Deep Strike is in play) -- being equipped with a drop pod only helps the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> units listed as poddable, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> use a different rule for determining who can pod.<br />  <br />  <br />  * Realistically, if you take the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> rules for which models can use pods (power armor, scouts, dreads on missions which allow Deep Strike), you lose access to OBEL when podding and can't pod in missions without Deep Strike.&nbsp; In an environment without exact knowledge of mission parameters, I wouldn't call this advantageous over the standard setup.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154340.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154340.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 6 Apr 2007 03:22:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lowinor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I remember when you could drop pod bikers. That was cool.<br><br>- Greenie]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154488.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/154488.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:17:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Green Bloater]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ My friend says that if space wolfs have even 1 unit in a drop pod then they must drop pod all units... is this correct]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258806.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258806.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:35:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ leoko4321]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This thread is 3 years old... I'd start a new one.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258812.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258812.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:37:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Gorkamorka]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yeah, they we're talking about the old <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> codex.<br /> <br /> Why in hell do newbies ressurect year old threads?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258910.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258910.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:20:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Karon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Space Wolves Drop Pod rule silliness</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Because the forum quicksearch feature by default arranges its results by ascending date rather than descending date. This means it displays the oldest threads first rather than the newest - an issue I've already raised in the Nuts&Bolts forum.<br /> <br /> Looks like he just did a search for Space Wolves and found that.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258993.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/153363/1258993.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:23:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Cheex]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>