<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/15.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I tried to look to see if this was posted elsewhere, but i didn't see anything. <br />  <br />  <i>I am not asking for the legality of Forge World models in play or anything like that...here is my question.</i><br />  <br />  I see nothing in the rules that states I couldn't take an <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span> Armored Company (i.e. all tanks) with Daemonhunter allies. Am i correct, or am I missing something in one of those books?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176631.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176631.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:31:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Korcheski]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I don't think there are any rules explicitly saying that you can't. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(70);'>IIRC</span>, Mauleed(?) mentioned <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(5);'>AC</span> with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(144);'>WH</span> for a Gladiator. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176639.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176639.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Flagg07]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ p. 25, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(144);'>WH</span> book, under Using Witch Hunters as Allies<br><br>"...Witch Hunters units can be included as allies in any of the following armies:<br><br>(skip <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> section)<br><br>Imperial Guard and its variants, such as Catachan Jungle Fighters and Armageddon Steel Legion."<br><br>That's pretty unequivocal to me. I mean, Imperial Guard Armored Company is pretty clearly an Imperial Guard variant.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176656.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176656.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:05:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mitsugi242]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <div   >That's pretty unequivocal to me. I mean, Imperial Guard Armored Company is pretty clearly an Imperial Guard variant.</div  ><br><br>I don't know that I'd agree with that statement.  The (now obsolete) examples at least included references back to Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>, and used something like the Force Org for an <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span> army.<br><br>Where is the current <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(5);'>AC</span> list?  Does it include any references back to Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176658.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176658.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:10:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Janthkin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ On page 21 of the Daemonhunters Codex, in the grey box on the lower right of the page, under the title &quot;Using Daemonhunters as Allies&quot; is verbage that allows Daemonhunters to be used as allies with &quot;Imperial Guard and its variants&quot; (which would include Armoured Company). There are some limitations, so check the codex.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176660.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176660.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:15:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Felix_Tredecim]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Janthkin  on  07/19/2007 4:10 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  <br />  Where is the current <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(5);'>AC</span> list?  Does it include any references back to Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>?</div></blockquote>  A few references would include the following links<br />  <br />  <a href="http://uk.games-workshop.com/imperialguard/ac-armylist/1/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>uk</span>.games-workshop.com/imperialguard/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(5);'>ac</span>-armylist/1/</a><br />  <a href="http://us.games-workshop.com/games/40k/imperialguard/gaming/ac_operations/default.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://us.games-workshop.com/games/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>/imperialguard/gaming/ac_operations/default.htm</a><br />  <br />  Clearly, Armoured Company is Imperial Guard]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176661.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176661.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:19:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Felix_Tredecim]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Janthkin  on  07/19/2007 4:10 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  <div   >That's pretty unequivocal to me. I mean, Imperial Guard Armored Company is pretty clearly an Imperial Guard variant.</div  ><br />  <br />  I don't know that I'd agree with that statement.  The (now obsolete) examples at least included references back to Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>, and used something like the Force Org for an <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span> army.<br />  <br />  Where is the current <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(5);'>AC</span> list?  Does it include any references back to Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>?</div></blockquote>  <br />  Current AC&nbsp; list can be found at <a target=_blank href="http://us.games-workshop.com/games/40k/imperialguard/gaming/ac_rules/assets/ac_rules.pdf">us.games-workshop.com/games/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>/imperialguard/gaming/ac_rules/assets/ac_rules.pdf </a><br />  <br />  And it does make references back to Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>. For example, under &quot;Imperial Guard Armory&quot;, it states &quot;Full rules for wargear may be found in <i>Codex: Imperial Guard</i>.&quot; Under Elites, &quot;Tech-Priest Enginseer, Per <i>Codex: Imperial Guard.</i>&quot; Admittedly, not many, but they are there.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176662.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176662.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:24:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mitsugi242]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well since the Armored Company uses imperial guard tanks and imperial guard guardsmen, I think you got a hard sell trying to convince anyone that Armored Company isn't an imperial guard variant.  That having been said, the direct quotes Mitsugi242 pointed out state that you can use witch hunters in an imperial guard army.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176775.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176775.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:50:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Phoenix]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <div   >Well since the Armored Company uses imperial guard tanks and imperial guard guardsmen, I think you got a hard sell trying to convince anyone that Armored Company isn't an imperial guard variant</div  ><br>Does that mean that Daemonhunters and Witch Hunters are 'Imperial Guard variants' as well since they can take those units?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176780.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176780.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:58:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ghaz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <div   >Does that mean that Daemonhunters and Witch Hunters are 'Imperial Guard variants' as well since they can take those units?</div  ><br><br>Not to put words in his mouth, but I would guess his answer to you would be no.<br><br>Do you have an opinion on the subject Ghaz?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176870.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176870.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:59:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Flagg07]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nope, just showing how that particular argument is flawed.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176873.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176873.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:32:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ghaz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: IG Armored Company and Daemonhunters allied?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Actually, the PDF rules do answer it pretty clearly.  It's not an "Armored Company".  Repeatedly in the rules it uses the title "Imperial Guard Armored Company".<br><br>Page 1:<br>"Imperial Guard Armory"<br>"Imperial Guard Vehicles"<br>"Imperial Guard Armored Company Summary"<br><br>Page 5 header:<br>"Imperial Guard Armored Company Doctrines"<br><br>Page 7 header:<br>"Imperial Guard Armored Company Vehicle Inventory"<br>"The Imperial Guard army is not noted... Tanks of the Imperial Guard..."<br>"Crew: Imperial Guard"<br><br>So, I would say it's a varient of the Imperial Guard.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176896.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/176631/176896.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:11:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Hans]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>