<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/7.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>With more and more safety concerns about Chinese toys I've been wondering if <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> might not benefit with a 'China free' campaign.&nbsp; It's one of the few toymakers out there with few or no Chinese components.</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>Any thoughts?</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187899.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187899.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 02:18:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kid_Kyoto]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ They have thier own sweatshops to worry about poking a stick in someone elses eye.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187900.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187900.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 02:23:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grot 6]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The Chinese toy problems seem to be mostly related to paint so it's not really an issue for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> to trumpet  - unless thier about to go pre-paint........]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187906.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187906.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 02:53:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ OldPeculiar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You would be surprised. After all, where do you think the books come from?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187914.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187914.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 03:53:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ BaconSlayer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Grot: &quot;They have thier own sweatshops to worry about poking a stick in someone elses eye.&quot;<br />  <br />  I am quick to rib <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> when they deserve it, but Citadel have a good safety record and pay their staff a reasonable wage. Also they have <b>NOT</b> outsourced their manufacturing to sweatshops abroad, they deserve some credit for that.<br />  <br />  Printing is outsourced to China because of the cost of book quality paper in ther <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>. Even so typesetting for the work is done in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span> studio and White Dwarf is printed here on recycled paper.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187969.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187969.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:23:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orlanth]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Old Peculiar: "The Chinese toy problems seem to be mostly related to paint so it's not really an issue for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> to trumpet - unless thier about to go pre-paint........"<br><br>I hate prepaint. Yes Wizkids can sell boxes of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(494);'>MW</span><img src='http://www.dakkadakka.com/DesktopModules/NTForums/images/emoticons/biggrin.gif'>A for little money with painted mechs trhe size of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> dreadnoughts. Yet it is done on the backs of wage slaves in Chinese factories. Just because the nation has turned capitalist doesnt mean they dont keep communism going to fill the factories with underpaid workers.<br><br>Citadel stuff is overpriced, but the manufacturing is still ethical.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187970.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187970.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:30:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orlanth]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Next time you go to your local store check out <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>'s Urban Barricades and Walls. Look at the back of the package it will say made in china. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187989.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/187989.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:59:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ canute]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well then, judging by everyone's knowledge of virtual" Slave labour" in China, <br><br>"Next time you go to your local store check out <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>'s Urban Barricades and Walls. Look at the back of the package it will say made in china. "<br><br>These should be cheaper for the customer than anything else they sell.  Unless of course, they are a business interested in making $$$'s]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188057.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188057.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:10:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I don't think an ad campaign that condemns 1 billion people for the actions of unscrupulous businesses, is any way fair. <br><br>Not all factories in China / Asia put arsenic in their clothing. <br><br>Not all people working in China / Asia are slaves. <br><br>This is national stereotyping. <br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188078.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188078.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:29:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ pnweerar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Orlanth on 09/03/2007 1:23 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  &nbsp;pay their staff a reasonable wage. <br />  <br />  </div></blockquote>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>This made me laugh.&nbsp; Decent pay my arse</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188086.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188086.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:58:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ beef]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "I don't think an ad campaign that condemns 1 billion people for the actions of unscrupulous businesses, is any way fair. <br><br>Not all factories in China / Asia put arsenic in their clothing. <br><br>Not all people working in China / Asia are slaves. <br><br>This is national stereotyping. "<br><br>Absolutely right. My apologies if I have implied/given any offense.<br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188280.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188280.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:49:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Orlanth on 09/03/2007 1:23 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  Grot: &quot;They have thier own sweatshops to worry about poking a stick in someone elses eye.&quot;<br />  <br />  I am quick to rib <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> when they deserve it, but Citadel have a good safety record and pay their staff a reasonable wage. Also they have <b>NOT</b> outsourced their manufacturing to sweatshops abroad, they deserve some credit for that.<br />  <br />  Printing is outsourced to China because of the cost of book quality paper in ther <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>. Even so typesetting for the work is done in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span> studio and White Dwarf is printed here on recycled paper.</div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  You haven't worked in a&nbsp;GW shop in the states, have you? :S ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188323.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188323.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:59:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grot 6]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ China is a communist dictatorship. Why on earth are you apologizing? ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188462.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188462.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 04:14:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I guess I felt that he was correct in the sterotyping call.<br><br>There is a lot of sweeping comments made(myself-no exception)<br><br>So I thought it was the right thing to do.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188542.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188542.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:39:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By beef on 09/04/2007 1:58 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Orlanth on 09/03/2007 1:23 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  &nbsp;pay their staff a reasonable wage. <br />  <br />  </div></blockquote>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>This made me laugh.&nbsp; Decent pay my arse</p>  </div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  In comparison to the wages paid in the Chinese garment / toy / etc / etc industries, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> wages are very decent.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188557.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188557.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:16:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Broon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The Shanghai production facility is very well run and a stand up business in China.  I am fluent in Mandarin and know that this is no sweatshop affair.  It pays well for the wages in China and is a standard factory job.  Most businesses in china are above board as it is easier to run production facilities that way.  <br><br>The problem with the paints is the govenrment didn't really care until the buyers started caring and we were buying from them and letting them figure out the cheapest way to get materials.<br><br>A good part of this is due to Mao Ze Dong and his race for producing the most iron in the word which turned out to be mostly worhtless and left a lot of waste behind that has industriously been turned into other things because no one is standing there saying hey this might kill someone.<br><br>Mostly it is the up and coming business owner looking for a cheap way to make goods and make a profit that just does it and doesn't ask too many questions.<br><br>Orion]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188606.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188606.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:01:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orion_44]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Broon on 09/05/2007 3:16 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By beef on 09/04/2007 1:58 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Orlanth on 09/03/2007 1:23 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  &nbsp;pay their staff a reasonable wage. <br />  <br />  </div></blockquote>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>This made me laugh.&nbsp; Decent pay my arse</p>  </div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  In comparison to the wages paid in the Chinese garment / toy / etc / etc industries, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> wages are very decent.</div></blockquote>  <p><br />  OK, I know I shouldn't wade hip deep into this, but here's a few things to remember about global trade:</p>  <p>1) Wages mean different things in different countries, where $1000 a year goes from crushing destitution in the industrial world to middle class in the developing world, to wealthy in sub-saharan africa.</p>  <p>2) Even given that, the definitions of class in different countries varies incredibly.&nbsp; In the US, even the working poor often own their homes and a car for every working adult.&nbsp; In India the middle class often have domestic servants.&nbsp; In Western Europe, nobody needs to worry about health care or education.&nbsp; In Asia or Africa, the middle class might not even have electricity or running water.</p>  <p>3) Wages, living conditions, working conditions have to be viewed in both absolute and relative terms.&nbsp; While it's reprehensible to treat workers as chattel, without knowing what the options are for those workers, it's hard to condemn it universally.&nbsp; Sure, I'd never want to work in a chinese sweatshop, but working as a chinese dirt farmer isn't exactly high on my list of dreams either.</p>  <p>4) Trade benefits both partners.&nbsp; Not equally, but trade only helps.&nbsp; If we refuse to trade with China, because they are too repressive, poor, etc.,, then both us and them are worse off.&nbsp; Trade is one of the most powerful tools for change in the world.</p>  <p>5) Finally, I'd want to point out that while even today sweatshops and child labor aren't completely eradicated in the West, they were overt and widespread as recently as a hundred years ago in the US.&nbsp; Around the same time, social welfare in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span> involved virtual incarceration in a workhouse.&nbsp; The west got better, the east will catch up.<br />  </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188607.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188607.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:12:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Polonius]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi Akira, <br><br>Thanks mate, I do appreciate it, though I did not take exception to anything you wrote in particular. <br><br>Two years ago,  I would have made the same judgments. Now that I am an Asian business owner and frequently read comments about how I must run a sweat shop or own slaves, the stereotypes of Asian business have been made very clear to me. <br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188614.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188614.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:10:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ pnweerar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Tai-Pan.<br><br><br> <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188622.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188622.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:09:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jester]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By jfrazell  on  09/05/2007 9:14 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  China is a communist dictatorship. Why on earth are you apologizing? </div></blockquote>  China's not really communist anymore.<br />  <br />  Generally not one to nitpick, but you gotta work the poli-sci degree every once in a while.<br />]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188628.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188628.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:03:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Salvation122]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You're right. the system is a defacto Fascist state at this time. So I restate, why on earth apologize. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188657.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188657.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:21:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nah its still communist.<br><br>However they are smart communists who realised that Marx was wrong. You can build successful socialism if you realise capitalism isnt the enemy of communism. Quite the opposite in fact, capitalism thrives in communism countries with limited free markets as they dont hae to deal wioth a labour movement or high service prices.  The middle class powerbase is the enemy of communism. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188661.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188661.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:54:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orlanth]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ er, by nature, capitalism and communist can't co-exist. They only exist in socialist and fascist regions. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188701.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188701.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 03:28:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Orlanth  on  09/06/2007 4:54 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  Nah its still communist.<br />  <br />  However they are smart communists who realised that Marx was wrong. You can build successful socialism if you realise capitalism isnt the enemy of communism. Quite the opposite in fact, capitalism thrives in communism countries with limited free markets as they dont hae to deal wioth a labour movement or high service prices.  The middle class powerbase is the enemy of communism. </div></blockquote>  <br />  You are confusing Communism with a non-democratic, one-party Capitalist state, where trade unions are effectively banned, and there are few legal safeguards for workers.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188741.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188741.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:20:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ untitled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yes communism and capitalism cannot co-exist.  The chinese government is trying to make this happen.  The administrators want to keep power but want big business and money too.  Right now we are watching to see what gives way.  And more and more it seems to be communism.<br><br>Orion]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188766.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188766.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 06:40:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orion_44]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ President Bush needs to split a thirty cube of Tsingtao with President Hu Jintao whilst he's in Australia, I'm all for leaders of countries being reserved, even dour, but I swear the guy looks like he just read the new Chaos Codex when he's on TV.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188825.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188825.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:33:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jester]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I don't think <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> can do a &quot;China-free&quot; campaign. Only companies who are into being hip, edgy, cool, or pretend like they're hippies do these sorts of campaigns.&nbsp; Foods that cater to vegetarians typically fall under this category.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188826.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188826.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:35:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ stonefox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ THey'd have to do an all natural/organically grown campaign to go with it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188846.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188846.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:58:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ PenguinDude]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Salvation122 on 09/05/2007 10:03 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By jfrazell on 09/05/2007 9:14 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  China is a communist dictatorship. Why on earth are you apologizing? </div></blockquote>  China's not really communist anymore.<br />  <br />  Generally not one to nitpick, but you gotta work the poli-sci degree every once in a while.<br />  </div></blockquote>  <p><br />  Has anyone told the Chinese Communist Party?</p>  <p>They may not live up to YOUR idea of communism but if you ask them they will tell you they are practicing Socialism With Chinese Characteristics, and that they never claimed to be communist but working through socialism towards communism.&nbsp;  <img src="/s/i/a/c944477abc92c1c101da485e07ff06d8.gif" border="0"> </p>  <p>Of course in the real world there is economic communism and political communism.&nbsp; While China's economy is capitalist with a bit of national socialism and kleptocracy thrown in their political system is basically soviet.</p>  <p><br />  </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188944.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188944.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:43:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kid_Kyoto]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ How would you know, its not like you're there.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188968.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188968.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:40:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ PenguinDude]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Er in Kid's case, that may be an inaccurate statement...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188979.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/188979.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:58:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think he was being facetious. And nice sig, PenguinDude. High-five for a fellow brah? Bro it up!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189005.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189005.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:18:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ stonefox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By PenguinDude on 09/07/2007 12:40 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  How would you know, its not like you're there.</div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  I am with it but not of it.&nbsp; I make it point to touch the soil of my homeland once a day.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189017.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189017.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:33:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kid_Kyoto]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Citadel stuff is overpriced, but the manufacturing is still ethical.</div></blockquote>  <p><br />  <br />  Overpriced in relation to what? Other companies? I've posted numerous times with warmachine and reaper figs and have proven you often get a better deal with Citadel.</p>  <p>Does overpriced mean in relation to what you can afford?</p>  <p>I can't afford a corvette, it doesn't mean the car is overrpriced. I don't go on car forums but I'm sure you don't see car aficionadoes whining on car boards about corvette prices.</p>  <p>Please tell me what the figures should be priced, and how <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> will cover its overhead at lower prices? Bear in mind that while lower prices might mean more sales, it also means higher production costs.</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189038.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189038.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:13:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ General Hobbs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>  <blockquote class="uncited"><div></div></blockquote>  </div></blockquote>  <p>2) Even given that, the definitions of class in different countries varies incredibly.&nbsp; In the US, even the working poor often own their homes and a car for every working adult.&nbsp; In India the middle class often have domestic servants.&nbsp; In Western Europe, nobody needs to worry about health care or education.&nbsp; In Asia or Africa, the middle class might not even have electricity or running water.</p>  </div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(84);'>Lol</span>....worry about health care....Sure, if having to wait months if not years for services that I can get tommorow&nbsp;means not worrying.&nbsp; The rich can still opt out to goto a private hospital ( at least in England) but the poor get screwed.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189039.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189039.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:19:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ General Hobbs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By General Hobbs on 09/07/2007 11:19 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>  <blockquote class="uncited"><div></div></blockquote>  </div></blockquote>  <p>2) Even given that, the definitions of class in different countries varies incredibly.&nbsp; In the US, even the working poor often own their homes and a car for every working adult.&nbsp; In India the middle class often have domestic servants.&nbsp; In Western Europe, nobody needs to worry about health care or education.&nbsp; In Asia or Africa, the middle class might not even have electricity or running water.</p>  </div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(84);'>Lol</span>....worry about health care....Sure, if having to wait months if not years for services that I can get tommorow&nbsp;means not worrying.&nbsp; The rich can still opt out to goto a private hospital ( at least in England) but the poor get screwed.</div></blockquote>  <br />  I'm really not sure what you're trying to do with that comment.&nbsp; Either you're simply trying to show that I'm wrong, or you really dislike social medicine.&nbsp; Both are fine stances with many supporters, but my assertion was merely that in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span> and western europe, people don't need to budget money for healthcare or higher education, while in the United States, both are completely the financial responsibility of the individiual.&nbsp; While yes, Private health insurance is superior to social medicine, social medicine is way, way better than having no health insurance in the United states, where&nbsp;a bad accident or expensive perscription can cause financial hardship or bankrupcy.&nbsp; When I said they don't need to worry about it, I meant that citizens/subjects of those countries weren't financially worrying.&nbsp; On the other hand, how many working class urban Britons have a car and own their own home?&nbsp; As I said, class is relative.<br />]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189107.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189107.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:23:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Polonius]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By General Hobbs on 09/07/2007 11:13 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Citadel stuff is overpriced, but the manufacturing is still ethical.</div></blockquote>  <p><br />  <br />  Overpriced in relation to what? Other companies? I've posted numerous times with warmachine and reaper figs and have proven you often get a better deal with Citadel.</p>  <p>Does overpriced mean in relation to what you can afford?</p>  <p>I can't afford a corvette, it doesn't mean the car is overrpriced. I don't go on car forums but I'm sure you don't see car aficionadoes whining on car boards about corvette prices.</p>  <p>Please tell me what the figures should be priced, and how <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> will cover its overhead at lower prices? Bear in mind that while lower prices might mean more sales, it also means higher production costs.</p>  </div></blockquote>  <p><br />  I find it intriguing that you show up in threads that aren't discussing <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> prices directly, and criticize a poster (who, by the way, is defending <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>'s business practices) for casually mentioning that their stuff is overpriced.&nbsp; We get it, you're understanding of the market tells you that the price for an item should be as high as the market can sustain while keeping demand high.&nbsp; Don't you think it's likely, just a bit, that what the poster meant was &quot;GW stuff, like a lot of materials in the niche markets of fantasy/sci fi hobbies, are expensive, due mostly to the low production runs and reliance on Western labor,&quot; not &quot;I hate <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>, their stuff is so expensive, it should be free?&quot;</p>  <p>As for your general theory, that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> prices are fixed at just above what they need to make a profit, then explain why there are large (50% or more) variations between currencies?&nbsp; Or dramatic price increases in the last 8 years on the plastics ($22 to $35), or why ancient, one piece models like Eldard are priced at $22?&nbsp; </p>  <p>The answer, of course, is that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> knows they can charge it, and do so.&nbsp; You don't need to zealously defend a legitimate business practice, nor do you need to police the boards looking for every person mentioning that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> is expensive.&nbsp; It is.&nbsp; Shockingly, so is Magic, video games, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(194);'>PP</span>, scuba diving, going to strip clubs, skiing, auto restoration and world conquest.&nbsp; Many, many hobbies that are worth doing are expensive.&nbsp; What pointing it out all the time does doesn't make you the guy with common sense, it makes you the guy that's a tool.&nbsp; Nobody likes that guy, because he's self righteous arrogant prat.&nbsp; Compare the three responses to &quot;GW is expensive:&quot;</p>  <p>1) &quot;Yeah, it's expensive, but between the decent re-sell potential, the multiple ways the game can be played (kill team, combat patrol, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(21);'>COD</span>, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(741);'>RTTs</span>, and apocolypse), and the fact that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> games are easier to find a game for than most other companies, makes <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> a better hobby investment than any of it's competitors, and really not a bad one in absolute terms.&quot;</p>  <p>2) &quot;Does overpriced mean in relation to what you can afford?&nbsp; I can't afford a corvette, it doesn't mean the car is overrpriced. I don't go on car forums but I'm sure you don't see car aficionadoes whining on car boards about corvette prices.&quot;</p>  <p>3) &quot;if it's too expensive, take up golf&quot;</p>  <p>Note how the first response is both reassuring, and uses, you know, facts and reality to convince a person that while expensive, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> is worth it.&nbsp; The latter two seem to say, &quot;why are you complaining?&nbsp; Only wimps complain about <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>.&quot;</p>  <p>I know which one I find more compelling, and since you seem pretty universally disliked around here, I'm guessing you haven't exactly captured a ton of flies with your vineager.</p>  <p>I'm posting this on the off chance that you're a deluded guy, inable to articulate why you like <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> and why you feel people shouldn't relentlessly kvetch about the prices.&nbsp; Realistically, I'm assuming you're a troll or flame baiter, merely posting to annoy others on the board, but you never know, I've been wrong before.</p>  <p><br />  </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189110.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189110.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:53:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Polonius]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>What I find intriguing is your need to attack me rather then just address the issue or answer the questions I posed. When a person has to make a personal attack it usually means they have no arguement to make. You then go and make deflecting questions meant to pose as answers.</p>  <p>As for being disliked, well, people don't like being called cheap, or having the fact that they can't afford to buy as many models as they like as fast as they like pointed out. It is amusing that that I make up fake screenames and put them in my sig and get told by moderators to change it, but other people can make screen names that are totally a take off of mine and it is done to insult me and they are not asked to change the sig. </p>  <p>It is also interesting that the gist of your post is attacking me for constantly defending the prices etc, yet you don't feel the need to post a similar reponse to the people who constantly feel the need in every post to complain about the prices.</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189113.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189113.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 07:49:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ General Hobbs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well, first off, I apologize for getting suckered into this.  I realize now that by tiptoing just over the edge from reasoned argument to personal insult, I would allow you to invalidate my entire post.  <br><br>In response:<br><br>1) I believe I did address the facts and issues, in both posts.  I believe, in fact, that I agreed with you on the second.  My questions weren't really meant to rebut your position, as I've watched you post far too long to dig in.  Rather, I think that the facts that I raise show that the pricing debate can remain just that: a debate that has merit.<br><br>2) I was not addressing your facts or analysis, but rather your behaviour, which while I suppose could be twisted into a personal attack, I believe is closer to the realm of observation or even ill fated help.  I was saying, "you are a tool and I hate you," but I was saying, "when you do these things, they make you look like a tool to me, and I find listening to your argument difficult."  I did not <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span> this, because as I stated, you're not the forums most popular dude, and a public intervention often leads to public forgivness.<br><br>3) Forgive me for being catty, but how is calling people cheap not a personal attack?  I'm not sure pointing out that your behaviour <br>can come off as insulting and rude is really a personal attack.<br><br>4) You raise a good question, about why I don't tell people to not complain about prices, but feel that I can tell you to stop telling them.  I have, I believe, a good answer.  When a person complains about prices (or any other immutable fact, like the weather), they are in essence making small talk.  They're commiserating, they're sharing pain, they're simply making noise while waiting for something else to talk about, yet in the end their complaining about a condition, a set of events and factors.  <br>    When you then complain about those people, you're no longer complaining about something that is abstract, you are calling out people and their behavior.  As you demonstrate very well, people don't like having their behaviour questioned and criticized.  The crucial difference is that you are complaining about people doing what people do, which while it's just as inevitable as the weather or the next price hike, still comes from people with bruised egos and thin skins.<br>   that's why I came down you, but not the people who complain, and that's why I suggested you spend more time pointing out the value that people get from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>, and less time making people feel bad about complaining.  <br><br><br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189165.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189165.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 18:18:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Polonius]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Again, I simply cannot wait for the "ignore user" function on the new forumware.<br><br>It shouldnt ever have to be used, but then again, you shouldnt have to suffer a fool either.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189176.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189176.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:38:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Hellfury]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Exalt. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189205.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189205.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Sep 2007 03:02:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ pnweerar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ People are taking my trolling lime light.  I need to argue with somebody now to prove my masculinity.  You all suck and wish you were redshirts at <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>.  take that]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189218.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189218.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Sep 2007 06:28:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ beef]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No 200 replies for beef from me.......................this time.<br><br>I wear a red shirt mate!!! It has a Frerrari symbol. You made me cry, and I'm gonna tell my Mom and General Hobbs onya!!!<br><br>I just have to say this, as a new Dakka poster, I feel that there is too much of the personal attack stuff going on. I know from personal experience that even those not involved throw thier 2 cents in, and make the attacks multiply.<br><br>How about this: When you read a post that pisses you off. Roll a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(24);'>D6</span>, on a result of 2-6, ignore it. On a 1, go for it.<br><br>We are all fans of a GREAT GAME. There are enough sporto-jock/anti-social Nazi's out there who hate gamers(I will get flamed now by Sporto-gamers!!!!   <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(84);'>lol</span>), so why don't we all just try to get along!!!<br><br>And to get back on track, I think the idea of a "China free ad-campaign" is un-workable. We are starting to really see a dissolving of economic borders(See USSR in the 90's), so really, who cares where it comes from or how its made?  <br><br>We pay around $5 for a 250ml can of Red-Bull here in Aus. Water, Taurine, and some other hideous chemical mix. When petrol hits $1.50 a litre(a non-renewable, highly proccessed and remotely aquired product) we all cry as consumers TOO HIGH!!!!!<br><br>Lets sort out what we pay for what, and then localise blame politically when we can hold our heads up high and say"We are the perfect society. Let's point the finger at these guys..............."<br><br>Just another tirade from Akira5665. Please don't flame me!!!!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189242.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189242.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Sep 2007 11:35:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Arguing on the internets eh? Can you feel the futility?<br>It's like ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189243.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189243.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Sep 2007 11:38:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Da Boss]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Short bus...<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(264);'>FTW</span>!!!!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189472.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189472.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:15:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grot 6]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By pnweerar on 09/04/2007 1:29 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  I don't think an ad campaign that condemns 1 billion people for the actions of unscrupulous businesses, is any way fair. <br />  <br />  Not all factories in China / Asia put arsenic in their clothing. <br />  <br />  Not all people working in China / Asia are slaves. <br />  <br />  This is national stereotyping. <br />  </div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  And not all people in jail committed crimes.... does this mean we shouldn't view criminals negativly because &quot;some&quot; of them are actually innocent?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189478.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189478.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:36:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angron]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By pnweerar on 09/04/2007 1:29 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  I don't think an ad campaign that condemns 1 billion people for the actions of unscrupulous businesses, is any way fair. <br />  <br />  Not all factories in China / Asia put arsenic in their clothing. <br />  <br />  Not all people working in China / Asia are slaves. <br />  <br />  This is national stereotyping. <br />  </div></blockquote>  <p><br />  <br />  I must disagree.&nbsp; No one I've heard is saying that Taiwanese goods are dangerous, or Singapore's, or Hong Kong's or goods and services from Chinese Americans.&nbsp; Not a word has been said about Korea or Japan or the rest of Asia.&nbsp; The current fears about Chinese goods are based on the economic and political situation in China, weak rule of law, weak contracts, pressure to cut every corner, rampant counterfeiting and so on.&nbsp; </p>  <p>It is a political problem, not a racial bias.</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189494.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189494.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:42:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kid_Kyoto]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The main reason people are beginning to get disturbed at China is simply because America is no longer ther only superpower. The hegemony attained with the collapse of the Soviet Union has ended. Beijing can stick 'the finger' to Washington anytime it likes. The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> is big enough to do so aswell, but they dont know their power and generally cant agree on anything.<br />  <br />  The Chinese dont flex their true muscles for two reasons, first its more profitable if people dont fear them and they are currently sucking in IP rights and trade links, they already have the tech and the manufacturing base, they need the established client base and a catalogue of copyrights. The short sighted European governments are giving those to them, particularly the ephemeral self interested lot in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>, and at very low prices too.<br />  <br />  More importantly they believe, not incorrectly, that Americans are globally insecure. The Soviets and Europeans were&nbsp;relatively content to have nukes parked next to them, when the Soviets parked some in Cuba noone expected the Yanks to wail as much as they did. Kennedy really did bring the world close to nuclear war with his public opinion backed&nbsp;histrionics. The Soviet attitude was: there are missiles in Turkey near the border pointed at Moscow, why should anyone care, we both have hemispheric capability and second strike capability? They couldnt understand why Washington was willing to see the world aflame over this, neither could anyone else.<br />  However Americans dont think that way, they enjoy the illusion of untouchability. 9/11 anyone. Beijing fears the potential results of the headless chicken dance in America that would happen if/when the Chinese&nbsp;come around to saying 'all your world economy belongs to us'.<br />  Thus they keep quiet.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189866.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189866.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:54:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orlanth]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>And here I didn't quite know why I hate&nbsp;people like you&nbsp;so much.... thank you for reinforcing that feeling. China is not a super power, China is the Mexico of the far east. Sure, they have a billion people economy, but the majority of that economy is so poor they can't even afford proper toothpaste. The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> can't do anything because the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> lacks the power to collect taxes, raise an army.... the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> is as bad as the Articles of Confederation in the United States was. I am surprised that Europeans aren't more greatful to the United States, considering the fact that the only reason all of you aren't speaking German right now and that you have seperate countries is because of the United States intervention. Sure, there are those who state that the United States didn't contribute to the war effort because the war ended so quickly after the United States became involved. Instead, realise that the REASON the war ended so quickly was BECAUSE the United States became involved. Furthermore, if the United States had not provided funds to all of the countries after the war for rebuilding, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> would be entirely made up of third world countries. On top of that, if the United States had not been providing the Allies with weapons, food, and equipment during the war at the time when they were not involved, the Allies would have starved and been outgunned in short order. As for the Soviets during the COLD <b><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(410);'>WAR</span></b>, if your pitiful country was at war with a country, and that country parked nuclear missiles close enough to your country for no other purpose than to fire them at your country, you might think to react. As for the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States intervention into that matter actually prevented nuclear war. As the forces stormed the beaches, the missiles were already set up, aimed, and preparing to be FIRED. If the United States had not stormed Cuba, the missiles WOULD HAVE been fired. </p>  <p>The United States of America (not America, as that includes every country in the western world) IS untouchable. By this I am not saying that some idiot with a bomb can't kill several of us, heck, we have people over here who do that anyway. I am saying that if someone ever dares to attack us, they're dead. Take a look at the death tolls of our enemies in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq..... we're a lot better at killing people than the rest of the world. If 9/11 (which by the way you are a complete and total jacka** for mentioning negatively the day after and I only hope that you never have to experience your family members dying so that you can remain the arrogant a**hole that you make yourself appear to be) *damaged* the United States of America at all, it would be considered a scratch, a hang nail, a paper cut. Look at what we did to Afghanistan in exchange..... We make it simple, you attack us, prepare for not only you, not only your family, not only your city, but your entire country to die. Would you take a swing at someone holding a gun to your head? I think not. Afghanistan did and we pulled the trigger.</p>  <p>So the next time you ungrateful little hippies see an American, tell them thank you. Thank you for saving your pitiful little countries. Thank you for providing the world with a stable economy. Thank you for kicking your scrawny little A** during the Revolutionary War. Because if the United States was not the super power &quot;bully&quot; that it is, you'd all be dead right now, while we would be on our side of the ocean, surrounded by a REAL ocean, not a scrawny little lake. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have fought and died so that little worthless pieces of ****&nbsp; like you can live. Thousands of Americans are still fighting and dying for that same reason. <b>So if you can't stand behind the troops who are fighting to protect your life.... then by all means, stand infront of them. </b></p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189882.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189882.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:02:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angron]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Angron on 09/12/2007 8:02 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  <p>And here I didn't quite know why I hate&nbsp;people like you&nbsp;so much.... thank you for reinforcing that feeling. China is not a super power, China is the Mexico of the far east. Sure, they have a billion people economy, but the majority of that economy is so poor they can't even afford proper toothpaste. The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> can't do anything because the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> lacks the power to collect taxes, raise an army.... the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> is as bad as the Articles of Confederation in the United States was. I am surprised that Europeans aren't more greatful to the United States, considering the fact that the only reason all of you aren't speaking German right now and that you have seperate countries is because of the United States intervention. Sure, there are those who state that the United States didn't contribute to the war effort because the war ended so quickly after the United States became involved. Instead, realise that the REASON the war ended so quickly was BECAUSE the United States became involved. Furthermore, if the United States had not provided funds to all of the countries after the war for rebuilding, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> would be entirely made up of third world countries. On top of that, if the United States had not been providing the Allies with weapons, food, and equipment during the war at the time when they were not involved, the Allies would have starved and been outgunned in short order. As for the Soviets during the COLD <b><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(410);'>WAR</span></b>, if your pitiful country was at war with a country, and that country parked nuclear missiles close enough to your country for no other purpose than to fire them at your country, you might think to react. As for the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States intervention into that matter actually prevented nuclear war. As the forces stormed the beaches, the missiles were already set up, aimed, and preparing to be FIRED. If the United States had not stormed Cuba, the missiles WOULD HAVE been fired. </p>  <p>The United States of America (not America, as that includes every country in the western world) IS untouchable. By this I am not saying that some idiot with a bomb can't kill several of us, heck, we have people over here who do that anyway. I am saying that if someone ever dares to attack us, they're dead. Take a look at the death tolls of our enemies in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq..... we're a lot better at killing people than the rest of the world. If 9/11 (which by the way you are a complete and total jacka** for mentioning negatively the day after and I only hope that you never have to experience your family members dying so that you can remain the arrogant a**hole that you make yourself appear to be) *damaged* the United States of America at all, it would be considered a scratch, a hang nail, a paper cut. Look at what we did to Afghanistan in exchange..... We make it simple, you attack us, prepare for not only you, not only your family, not only your city, but your entire country to die. Would you take a swing at someone holding a gun to your head? I think not. Afghanistan did and we pulled the trigger.</p>  <p>So the next time you ungrateful little hippies see an American, tell them thank you. Thank you for saving your pitiful little countries. Thank you for providing the world with a stable economy. Thank you for kicking your scrawny little A** during the Revolutionary War. Because if the United States was not the super power &quot;bully&quot; that it is, you'd all be dead right now, while we would be on our side of the ocean, surrounded by a REAL ocean, not a scrawny little lake. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have fought and died so that little worthless pieces of ****&nbsp; like you can live. Thousands of Americans are still fighting and dying for that same reason. <b>So if you can't stand behind the troops who are fighting to protect your life.... then by all means, stand infront of them. </b></p>  </div></blockquote>  <p><br />  &nbsp;This type of idiocy is why so many people have a negative atitude about America and Americans. I am an American with a brother who has served in Iraq, I worry each time he is deployed, but that doesnt mean that I have to blindly agree that only pro-american rheteric needs to be shouted in three part harmany from the rest of the world adoring our american asses.</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>&nbsp;Now back to talking about full grown men playing with toys.&nbsp; I dont think any type of China free ad campaign is gonna be benificial to <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>, it would pretty much be a waste of resorces better spent elsewhere <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(72);'>IMO</span>.<br />  </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189900.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189900.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:10:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ grimshawl]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You guys are ruining my, and I bet others', enjoyment of a Pan Oceania vs. US-<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> Alliance near-future sci-fi outlook. Infinity is awesome for a reason (apart from cool-looking models). Now I'll go back to my Battlefield 2142 game where the Chinese/Korea guys are fighting the US/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> guys.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189901.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189901.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:13:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ stonefox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Angron on 09/12/2007 8:02 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  <p>And here I didn't quite know why I hate&nbsp;people like you&nbsp;so much.... thank you for reinforcing that feeling. China is not a super power, China is the Mexico of the far east. Sure, they have a billion people economy, but the majority of that economy is so poor they can't even afford proper toothpaste. The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> can't do anything because the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> lacks the power to collect taxes, raise an army.... the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> is as bad as the Articles of Confederation in the United States was. I am surprised that Europeans aren't more greatful to the United States, considering the fact that the only reason all of you aren't speaking German right now and that you have seperate countries is because of the United States intervention. </p>  <p><b>Love seeing that one trotted out.</b></p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>Sure, there are those who state that the United States didn't contribute to the war effort because the war ended so quickly after the United States became involved. Instead, realise that the REASON the war ended so quickly was BECAUSE the United States became involved. </p>  <p><b>Actually the reason the war ended so quickly was that everyone in the West moved thier timetables up as the Eastern front collapsed. </b></p>  <p>Furthermore, if the United States had not provided funds to all of the countries after the war for rebuilding, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> would be entirely made up of third world countries. On top of that, if the United States had not been providing the Allies with weapons, food, and equipment during the war at the time when they were not involved, the Allies would have starved and been outgunned in short order.</p>  <p><b>Or America could have been remained locked in it's prewar duldrums incapable of breaking free from the Depression and becoming the industrial superpower it was at it's hieght. The war was a godsend to the American economy.</b></p>  <p>&nbsp;As for the Soviets during the COLD <b><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(410);'>WAR</span></b>, if your pitiful country was at war with a country, and that country parked nuclear missiles close enough to your country for no other purpose than to fire them at your country, you might think to react. </p>  <p><b>Like we should thank god the Soviets did not do. As well the Cold war is notable in that war was not <i><u>ever</u></i> declared.</b></p>  <p>As for the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States intervention into that matter actually prevented nuclear war. As the forces stormed the beaches, the missiles were already set up, aimed, and preparing to be FIRED. If the United States had not stormed Cuba, the missiles WOULD HAVE been fired. </p>  <p><b>There is no resonable evidence that this was the case. There isn't even unreasonable evidence of such.&nbsp; Also what are you talking about (stormed the beaches)? Do you know what you are talking about? Do you have any clue what you are talking about?</b></p>  <p>The United States of America (not America, as that includes every country in the western world) IS untouchable. </p>  <p><b>I presume you mean every nation in the new world. Hubris is the best word to describe that sentence.</b></p>  <p>By this I am not saying that some idiot with a bomb can't kill several of us, heck, we have people over here who do that anyway. I am saying that if someone ever dares to attack us, they're dead. Take a look at the death tolls of our enemies in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq..... we're a lot better at killing people than the rest of the world. </p>  <p><b>Yes your ability to beat up thrid world nations is duly noted. Vietnam is generally regarded as a loss, and Iraq is headed that way, for fairness sake. As well your casualty rates in wars against first world nations have always been a fairly even exchange.</b></p>  <p>If 9/11 (which by the way you are a complete and total jacka** for mentioning negatively the day after and I only hope that you never have to experience your family members dying so that you can remain the arrogant a**hole that you make yourself appear to be) *damaged* the United States of America at all, it would be considered a scratch, a hang nail, a paper cut. </p>  <p><b>Freedoms were curtailed, your consitituion spat upon and you consider that a hang nail. The damage done on 9/11 was insiginifcant to the subsequent damage your government to your own nation&nbsp;did following it. The terrorsits won. It is no longer business as usual.</b></p>  <p>Look at what we did to Afghanistan in exchange..... </p>  <p><b>You blew up the structures the Soviets missed. Medals all round. Now that you've finished breaking it can you fix it. And while your at it please quit killing your allies. It makes it really hard for us to want to work with you.</b></p>  <p>We make it simple, you attack us, prepare for not only you, not only your family, not only your city, but your entire country to die. Would you take a swing at someone holding a gun to your head? I think not. Afghanistan did and we pulled the trigger.</p>  <p><b>Ooooh maturity. I like that. </b></p>  <p><b>But for the record, Taliban still there? Yup.</b></p>  <p><b>Bin Laden still kicking? Yup.</b></p>  <p><b>Still you missed the original target because your boss, he no think to straight.</b></p>  <p>So the next time you ungrateful little hippies see an American, tell them thank you. </p>  <p><b>I rather doubt it. Unless they do something polite in which case I will respond in kind.</b></p>  <p>Thank you for saving your pitiful little countries. </p>  <p><b>Since the only time my nation has been threatened it was the Americans, I'll pass.</b></p>  <p>Thank you for providing the world with a stable economy. </p>  <p><b>Yeah about that. </b></p>  <p><b>ENRON, Worldcom, subprime mortages. Yep. Love that stability.</b></p>  <p>Thank you for kicking your scrawny little A** during the Revolutionary War. </p>  <p><b><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(411);'>WE</span> got ours back when you invaded us 30 years later.</b></p>  <p>Because if the United States was not the super power &quot;bully&quot; that it is, you'd all be dead right now, while we would be on our side of the ocean, surrounded by a REAL ocean, not a scrawny little lake. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have fought and died so that little worthless pieces of ****&nbsp; like you can live. </p>  <p>Proving once and for all why every nation around the world should love Americans with your attitude.</p>  <p>Thousands of Americans are still fighting and dying for that same reason. So if you can't stand behind the troops who are fighting to protect your life.... then by all means, stand infront of them. </p>  <b>I realllllly hate that attitude. In many ways I have have met very few Americans I have truly disliked, but there is a stream in American thinking that everyone should bow before them and I loathe those who proclaim it.</b> <br />  <br />  </div></blockquote>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189905.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189905.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:42:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ efarrer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>I wanted it noted for the record for once I wasn't the one who started the cross border fight. <br />  <br />  I think most people (at least in the US, vs. India which has its own reasons) are annoyed with China because-<br />  *they are supplying nuke technology to the Iranians who will eventually use it to try to kill us. <br />  *they were worried about their pets being killed due to food poisoning<br />  *now they are worried about their paint killing their kids. <br />  <br />  In before lock!</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189922.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189922.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:15:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Angron seems angry about a whole lotta things.......<br><br>I have no issue with Americans. I live in Australia, served in our Navy for four years, and did a lot of tours through the Pacific/Atlantic and the Med, and met heaps of the US Service personnell.<br><br>Love thier Football especially(GO THE NY GIANTS!!!!!)<br><br>Love the beer(best in the world-Millers Genuine Draft!!)(misspelled)<br><br>Love the Movies produced(Mostly)<br><br>But I hate Ignorant/Blinker wearing REDNECKS, who steal valuable electricity/time when they sprout crap.<br><br><br>IN before lock!<br><br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189962.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189962.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:03:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You guys not only ride the short bus, you drive it as well, Where on earth do you all get such great information and world knowledge?<br><br>China is China, they have bills to pay as well. Just because they want to use lead paint, why cry about it, I used to play with lead, and I liked it!<br><br>I think some of you out there should stop partaking in lead paint chips, It's been known to affect your brain.<br><br>As for winning and losing,<br>We's orks. Orks is never beaten.<br><br>Go back to talking about minis and leave politics to the jerk offs.( see dakka rulz for more info.)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189963.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189963.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:05:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grot 6]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Too right Grot, I just got annoyed with the "Angron thread".<br><br>Apologies all, let's game on.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189964.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189964.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:11:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Do people do China free ad campaigns? Apparently I'm beyond the reach of<br>advertising (I don't know if that's good or bad)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189969.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189969.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:42:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ malfred]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Angron  on  09/12/2007 8:02 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  <p>&nbsp;<b>So if you can't stand behind the troops who are fighting to protect your life.... then by all means, stand infront of them. </b></p>  </div></blockquote>  <br />  Thats one of the most repugnant things I have ever seen on Dakka.<br />  <br />  Thats saying alot, since I have been on this site for a decade.<br />  <br />  To quote a wiseman (Ok, just Iorek):<br />  <br />  &quot;Die in a fire&quot;.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189976.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189976.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:17:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Hellfury]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ One of the worst things about our government is that they have tied together<br>the ideas of "supporting our troops" with "supporting our politics," and, even more<br>insidiously, "support our administration."<br><br>You don't have to do one to support the other.<br><br>But that's difficult to do. If I had a friend or loved one who died fighting for wars <br>that didn't have to be fought, I would HATE for some Lefty to rub the fact that<br>the politics mean my friend or loved one died for a cause that was making things<br>worse. I wouldn't want a reporter or politician asking me questions about how<br>I felt about the war. <br><br>People like Military Families Speak Out are probably in the minority, but they aren't<br>hippies. <br><br>Support =! war. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189980.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189980.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:35:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ malfred]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Angron on 09/12/2007 8:02 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  <p>And here I didn't quite know why I hate&nbsp;people like you&nbsp;so much.... thank you for reinforcing that feeling. China is not a super power, China is the Mexico of the far east. Sure, they have a billion people economy, but the majority of that economy is so poor they can't even afford proper toothpaste. The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> can't do anything because the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> lacks the power to collect taxes, raise an army.... the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> is as bad as the Articles of Confederation in the United States was. I am surprised that Europeans aren't more greatful to the United States, considering the fact that the only reason all of you aren't speaking German right now and that you have seperate countries is because of the United States intervention. Sure, there are those who state that the United States didn't contribute to the war effort because the war ended so quickly after the United States became involved. Instead, realise that the REASON the war ended so quickly was BECAUSE the United States became involved. Furthermore, if the United States had not provided funds to all of the countries after the war for rebuilding, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(731);'>EU</span> would be entirely made up of third world countries. On top of that, if the United States had not been providing the Allies with weapons, food, and equipment during the war at the time when they were not involved, the Allies would have starved and been outgunned in short order. As for the Soviets during the COLD <b><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(410);'>WAR</span></b>, if your pitiful country was at war with a country, and that country parked nuclear missiles close enough to your country for no other purpose than to fire them at your country, you might think to react. As for the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States intervention into that matter actually prevented nuclear war. As the forces stormed the beaches, the missiles were already set up, aimed, and preparing to be FIRED. If the United States had not stormed Cuba, the missiles WOULD HAVE been fired. </p>  <p>The United States of America (not America, as that includes every country in the western world) IS untouchable. By this I am not saying that some idiot with a bomb can't kill several of us, heck, we have people over here who do that anyway. I am saying that if someone ever dares to attack us, they're dead. Take a look at the death tolls of our enemies in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq..... we're a lot better at killing people than the rest of the world. If 9/11 (which by the way you are a complete and total jacka** for mentioning negatively the day after and I only hope that you never have to experience your family members dying so that you can remain the arrogant a**hole that you make yourself appear to be) *damaged* the United States of America at all, it would be considered a scratch, a hang nail, a paper cut. Look at what we did to Afghanistan in exchange..... We make it simple, you attack us, prepare for not only you, not only your family, not only your city, but your entire country to die. Would you take a swing at someone holding a gun to your head? I think not. Afghanistan did and we pulled the trigger.</p>  <p>So the next time you ungrateful little hippies see an American, tell them thank you. Thank you for saving your pitiful little countries. Thank you for providing the world with a stable economy. Thank you for kicking your scrawny little A** during the Revolutionary War. Because if the United States was not the super power &quot;bully&quot; that it is, you'd all be dead right now, while we would be on our side of the ocean, surrounded by a REAL ocean, not a scrawny little lake. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have fought and died so that little worthless pieces of ****&nbsp; like you can live. Thousands of Americans are still fighting and dying for that same reason. <b>So if you can't stand behind the troops who are fighting to protect your life.... then by all means, stand infront of them. </b></p>  </div></blockquote>  Well, I was going to&nbsp;comment&nbsp;on Heneral Gobbs' (obvious) trolling.&nbsp; I was going to say something to the&nbsp;effect that reading posts like&nbsp;his make&nbsp;me feel&nbsp;sorry that I have eyes and the capacity for symbolic thought.&nbsp; I was going to&nbsp;say it was one of the dumbest posts I've seen in months if not years.&nbsp;&nbsp;But then I read this.&nbsp; Wow.&nbsp; Just... wow.<br />  <br />  In before lock!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189997.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/189997.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:10:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Abadabadoobaddon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Who's the <i>shen jing bing</i> that started this thread?<br><br>In before lock!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190002.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190002.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:49:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jester]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It was a great thread, it raised ethical/moral issues that as gamers, we probably do not think about a lot(speaking for myself really.)<br><br>Too bad. It had pretty much run its course tho....................<br><br><br><br>In B4 lock]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190019.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190019.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:08:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div><b>So if you can't stand behind the troops who are fighting to protect your life.... then by all means, stand infront of them. </b></div></blockquote>  <p><br />  So Angron .... <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(334);'>WTF</span> are you not in the armed services?</p>  <p>Seems to me that you failed both the intelligence &amp; psych tests.&nbsp; Not to mention the human test </p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>..... this is the most stupid idiotic thing I've seen on the internet.&nbsp; It's a shame that you evolved far enough to develop language skills.</p>  <p>I'm reminded of a saying &quot;Never argue with anyone on the internet; (I won't finish the rest ... I don't want to be banned .... but you all know how it goes).&quot;</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190054.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190054.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:24:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Meep357]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In the midst of all the politics that are not appropos to the topic, has anyone noted that the labeling on miniatures suggests that they arent for young children anyhow?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190125.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190125.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:57:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grignard]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>Hey watch the Texas slam Canada boy. Don't make us send the Cedar Park brownie girl scouts up there to take over Canada.  <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0"> &nbsp; &nbsp; <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0"> &nbsp;&nbsp;  <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0"> </p>  <p>I'd say this is officially the first bonafide thread that should go to <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(276);'>OTT</span> land. </p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190197.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190197.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:10:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[  <img src="/s/i/a/c944477abc92c1c101da485e07ff06d8.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190213.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190213.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:33:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Meep357 on 09/13/2007 4:24 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span>  <p>..... this is the most stupid idiotic thing I've seen on the internet.&nbsp; It's a shame that you evolved far enough to develop language skills.</p>  <p>I'm reminded of a saying &quot;Never argue with anyone on the internet; (I won't finish the rest ... I don't want to be banned .... but you all know how it goes).&quot;</p>  </div></blockquote>  <br />  <br />  Yup. I think I have to apologize to Ozymandius again. This beats anything he ever said sooooo far that I feel really bad for ever having thought it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190215.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190215.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:41:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ efarrer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Triggerbaby on 09/13/2007 11:52 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span><br />  <p>I have&nbsp;formed an image of you&nbsp;in my mind, Angron. </p>  <p>A&nbsp;vile, ignorant, hateful redneck who lives in frakking third-world hick heckhole that consists of a church and a Dairy Queen that prints Bible verses on the cash register receipts.</p>  </div></blockquote>  <p><br />  Verses on receipts?&nbsp; That's new to me and I've lived more than half my life in&nbsp;different sectors of the&nbsp;Dirty South.</p>  <p>I like you, Trigger, but dissing Duane Chapman is uncalled for!<br />  </p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190256.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190256.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:46:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jester]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <p>&nbsp;</p>  <p>Wow nice to see a thread devolve. Thought I'd throw in my 2 cents before lock.</p>  <p>A true story....some nato officers were having a meeting, and some of the French officers were complaining that everything was being done in English at the request of the Americans. A British official pointed out that if it wasn't for America, the meeting would be in German.</p>  <p>The Missiles in Cuba: People forget that one of the tenets of Communism was to spread across the world. Putting missiles in Cuba was a threat to American security. Maybe a more symbolic threat because we all know that missiles in Siberia or in Russian subs are undetectable.</p>  <p>As for losing the war, I think people are putting too much into the spin of the Anti Bush press. Before the war, the left said casualties would be in the hundreds of thousands. They weren't. After we took Baghdad, people said we would be attacked by Al Qaeda. We have not been. We were chastised for not capturing Hussein. We did so. And we have inflicted heavy losses on Al Qaeda and the Taliban.</p>  <p>Only in 100 years, when people look back, will anyone be able to decide who won the war. </p>  <p>I find it amusing that when someone is Pro-American, they are labelled a redneck jerk and ignorant, but when somene is anti-American, they are considered educated and intelligent, as they batter the Pro-American into silence. The same with people who are Pro-<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> and anti-<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>.</p>  <p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190274.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190274.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:46:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Green Angel]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Sorry Green Angel, but there is something about your statements i don't like.<br><br>"I find it amusing that when someone is Pro-American, they are labelled a redneck jerk and ignorant, but when somene is anti-American, they are considered educated and intelligent, as they batter the Pro-American into silence. The same with people who are Pro-<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> and anti-<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>"<br><br>I love your country, history, and the "American way" to quote Supes.<br><br>I just hated how Angron equated "Patriotism" with soldiers.  They do an onerous, dangerous and downright difficult job. It is called thier "DUTY" when they sign up and swear by the Flag of thier country.<br><br>The poloticians send them, and then say gthey are "Brave" and "Died upholding the virtues of thier country". Apart from Kamikazes, I never heard of a soldier willingly Dying. I was in the Navy for my service, and I know some things about it.<br>Ahhh, I will just shut up. We really can't get anywhere with this stuff. <br><br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190288.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190288.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:37:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ akira5665]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Posted By Green Angel  on  09/13/2007 8:46 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(634);'>PM</span><br />  <p>&nbsp;</p>  A true story....some nato officers were having a meeting, and some of the French officers were complaining that everything was being done in English at the request of the Americans. A British official pointed out that if it wasn't for America, the meeting would be in German.&nbsp;</div></blockquote>  <br />  More likely is that they (and possibly the americans) would be speaking german if it wasn't for the british (if i remember correctly one of the big concerns of the amercican govt of the time was the royal navy falling into german hands if britain had surrendered, making germany a big naval power at the drop of a hat), or speaking ruskie if it wasn't for the americans - the soviets were unlikely to have lost even without the USA entering the war, which probably would have left europe as soviet clients.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190303.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190303.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:00:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ puree]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Que? Are you saying Americans, who even then had more guns, more territory, and more oil, would be speaking German if not for the British?  No power has even come close to defeating the US in the Americas since Andy Jackson and some French rednecks kicked the teeth of the British in at New Orleans.  <br><br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190315.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190315.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:17:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Frazzled]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>RE: Should GW do a 'China free' ad campaign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ How come most people say British when it's something bad and then English when it's something good?<br><br><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(84);'>lol</span>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190345.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/187899/190345.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:57:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Brother Bartius]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>