<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. "]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/15.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. "]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Okay..here is the example:<br /> <br /> Say there is chaos sorceror equipped with Lash of Submission mounted in a rhino. The rhino moves 12" can I use Lash out the top hatch (fire point) even though I am moving at Cruising Speed? Cruising Speed prohibits Weapons from Firing. Can Lash still be cast even though it says it's used instead of another ranged weapon..but isn't classified as a weapon. Discuss.<br /> <br /> Capt K]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/425373.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/425373.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:22:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CaptKaruthors]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No, the Sorcerer may not use the Lash of Submission when embarked on a vehicle moving at cruising speed. See p.66 and p.50 of the rulebook. He would need to disembark in order to use the Lash of Submission.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/425379.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/425379.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:27:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ah, but the argument is made that you can because Lash isn't classified as a shooting psychic attack. I agree with you, but someone on another forum is claiming this. I just wanted Dakka's take on it. So send in the posse!<br /> <br /> Here is the link to the forum if you where this is being discussed.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://orlando40k.3.forumer.com/index.php?showtopic=1845&st=81" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://orlando40k.3.forumer.com/index.php?showtopic=1845&<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(171);'>st</span>=81</a><br /> <br /> <br /> Capt K]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426260.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426260.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:37:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CaptKaruthors]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Tell them that they're dumb and move on <img src="/s/i/a/c944477abc92c1c101da485e07ff06d8.gif" border="0"><br /> <br /> Lash most certainly is a shooting power.  The words, "A psyker may use this power in the Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."  tend to give it away.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426272.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426272.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:44:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Redbeard]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ On p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines it says of both Lash of Submission and Doombolt:<br /> <br /> "A psyker may use this psychic power in the Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> "Doombolt may be used in the model's Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> On p.50 of the Rulebook it says of Psychic Shooting Attacks:<br /> <br /> "Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon (an assault weapon, unless specified otherwise). So, for example, the psyker must be able to see his target unit, cannot be locked in combat, or must not have run in the Shooting phase if he wishes to use a psychic shooting attack."<br /> <br /> So the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack, and is limited in the ways specified in the rulebook.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426291.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426291.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:55:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Agree with Nurglitch.  If there is anything that prevents you from using a ranged weapon (for example riding in a transport that moved at cruising speed) then you may not use Lash.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426436.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426436.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:00:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wyomingfox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There is one question that form the heart of this argument:<br /> <br /> <b>Is Lash a "shooting psychic power" as defined by the rules on Page 50?</b><br /> <br /> One argument says Yes! because it takes place "instead of firing a weapon". That solves the issue that created this thread but leads to other complications. For example, if it is a psychic shooting attack, does it need to roll to hit? Does he have to charge the unit he Lashes? Etc. Etc.<br /> <br /> One argument says No! Just because the power takes the place of a weapon, does not immediately classify it as a weapon itself. It's like saying that instead of firing a cannon, to instead eat this pie. Just because you are making a substitution does not suddenly turn a Pie into a Canon. This argument says that Lash simply follows the rules for Lash as stated, nothing more, nothing less. If Lash isn't a "shooting psychic power" then there is no restriction stopping a Slaneesh Sorceror from using it in a vehicle that has move over 6". ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426532.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426532.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:04:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mahu]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Actually, the answer is in the semantics of the rule.<br /> <br /> 'A psyker may use this power in the shooting phase instead of <i>another</i> ranged weapon'<br /> <br /> By stating another, it is clearly showing Lash of Submission to be an alternate ranged weapon at the disposal of the Sorceror.<br /> <br /> Oh, and I demand anyone who uses double Lash in their force play Devo's 'Whip It' during their turns, and limits their turn to the length of the song.<br /> <br /> 'When a problem comes along, you must whip it'<br /> 'Now Whip it, into shape. Go forward. Move ahead'<br /> <br /> Pretty much written for that psychic power <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426544.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426544.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:14:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mad Doc Grotsnik]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nevermind.<br /> <br /> Discovered my own error and removed my post to save myself some embarrassment.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426564.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426564.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:37:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Saldiven]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If you want to use Lash in a cruising transport while avoiding an arguement, just disembark.  You are now free to move about the cabin.  <br /> <br /> Quick question and just for my information, does Lash need <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(85);'>LOS</span>?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426670.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426670.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:56:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wyomingfox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yes Lash needs <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(85);'>LOS</span>.<br /> <br /> Capt K]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426705.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426705.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:18:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CaptKaruthors]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There is more evidence to support that it is a shooting attack than there is showing that it is not a shooting attack. Additionally, claiming that you can Lash and Run is laughable as well. <br /> <br /> Capt K<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Mahu wrote:</cite>There is one question that form the heart of this argument:<br /> <br /> <b>Is Lash a "shooting psychic power" as defined by the rules on Page 50?</b><br /> <br /> One argument says Yes! because it takes place "instead of firing a weapon". That solves the issue that created this thread but leads to other complications. For example, if it is a psychic shooting attack, does it need to roll to hit? Does he have to charge the unit he Lashes? Etc. Etc.<br /> <br /> One argument says No! Just because the power takes the place of a weapon, does not immediately classify it as a weapon itself. It's like saying that instead of firing a cannon, to instead eat this pie. Just because you are making a substitution does not suddenly turn a Pie into a Canon. This argument says that Lash simply follows the rules for Lash as stated, nothing more, nothing less. If Lash isn't a "shooting psychic power" then there is no restriction stopping a Slaneesh Sorceror from using it in a vehicle that has move over 6". </div></blockquote>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426707.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426707.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:19:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CaptKaruthors]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The more I think about it, the more I am inclined to believe that it is a shooting weapon, which you don't need to roll to hit for because Codex &gt; Rulebook.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426731.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426731.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:40:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mahu]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Mahu wrote:</cite> which you don't need to roll to hit for because Codex &gt; Rulebook. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Kind of like MindWar if I recall correctly]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426889.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426889.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:00:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wyomingfox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxH39QlRuhg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxH39QlRuhg</a><br /> <br />  <img src="/s/i/a/ef7b97610a8bf5b2bd5df8209dc08ff3.gif" border="0">  <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0">  <img src="/s/i/a/ef7b97610a8bf5b2bd5df8209dc08ff3.gif" border="0"> <br /> <br /> G]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426906.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426906.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:21:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Black Blow Fly]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ from what it says i would class it as shooting.<br /> so it wouldnt be able to fire from a transport is moving at a certain speed ect ect.....]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426912.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426912.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:27:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ JD21290]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So I wonder who will be the first to have a soscorer or <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DP</span> Devo conversion?  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426919.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426919.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:34:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wyomingfox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nah, still be better with a Hive tyrant and guard with Lash Whips.... and those cool red hats.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426991.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426991.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:22:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ coredump]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Maybe a Lucius conversion where he wears a red helmet?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426999.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/426999.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:32:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ HAAAA!!!<br /> <br /> <img src="/s/i/a/baf5f2e54c6b17d5c5d39aecadfa1272.gif" border="0"><br /> <br /> G]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427026.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427026.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:58:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Black Blow Fly]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There is nothing in the rule that says the lash is a shooting attack. Its used instead of any other, but doesnt say it is one itself. Feel free to use it if you want when playing <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span>.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427331.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427331.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:18:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If Lash is used in the shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon then it should be classed as a shooting attack.<br /> <br /> If it isnt a shooting attack it creates other debates as well, like can i lash a unit then assault a different one?<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> GMort.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427434.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427434.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:03:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ GMort]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>If it isnt a shooting attack it creates other debates as well, like can i lash a unit then assault a different one? </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Exactly. By his logic you'd be able to Lash and Run as well...which we all know is rediculous.<br /> <br /> Capt K]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427437.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/427437.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:04:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CaptKaruthors]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Wich you may or may not know, but if you read it there is NOTHING stating that it is a shooting attack. Just a lot of things to indicate that it might be.<br /> <br /> Running, assulting diffrent things whatever, there is nothing restricting it how it is written.<br /> <br /> This is however by strict <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>raw</span> and will probably not make you any friends.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429109.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429109.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:31:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Maybe instead of "<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span>" you should just read the rules properly. It states that the Lash of Submission is a shooting attack. <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>On p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines it says of both Lash of Submission and Doombolt:<br /> <br /> "A psyker may use this psychic power in the Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> "Doombolt may be used in the model's Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> On p.50 of the Rulebook it says of Psychic Shooting Attacks:<br /> <br /> "Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon (an assault weapon, unless specified otherwise). So, for example, the psyker must be able to see his target unit, cannot be locked in combat, or must not have run in the Shooting phase if he wishes to use a psychic shooting attack."<br /> <br /> So the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack, and is limited in the ways specified in the rulebook.</div></blockquote>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429122.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429122.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:44:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>Maybe instead of "<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span>" you should just read the rules properly. It states that the Lash of Submission is a shooting attack. <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>On p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines it says of both Lash of Submission and Doombolt:<br /> <br /> "A psyker may use this psychic power in the Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> "Doombolt may be used in the model's Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> On p.50 of the Rulebook it says of Psychic Shooting Attacks:<br /> <br /> "Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon (an assault weapon, unless specified otherwise). So, for example, the psyker must be able to see his target unit, cannot be locked in combat, or must not have run in the Shooting phase if he wishes to use a psychic shooting attack."<br /> <br /> So the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack, and is limited in the ways specified in the rulebook.</div></blockquote></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> There you go making sense again <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429136.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429136.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:58:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wyomingfox]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Kallbrand wrote:</cite>Wich you may or may not know, but if you read it there is NOTHING stating that it is a shooting attack. Just a lot of things to indicate that it might be.<br /> <br /> Running, assulting diffrent things whatever, there is nothing restricting it how it is written.<br /> <br /> This is however by strict <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>raw</span> and will probably not make you any friends.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> By strict <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> it is. Read the rule book. Nurglethingy has provided the page number. Also the rule says instead of "another" - therefore by definition it must be one as well.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429203.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429203.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:24:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ fullheadofhair]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Where in lash of submission does it state that it is a "psychic shooting attack"?? You can quote all you want from the rules but there isnt any line saying that it actually is and that is by strict <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span>.<br /> <br /> The fact that it is used in the shooting phase doesnt mean that it is, neither does the fact that it is used instead of firing another weapon. It just means you cant do both. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429550.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429550.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:15:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I would agree that by <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> lash isn't a shooting attack. Nurglitch's ("instead of using another ranged weapon") only proves that it is ranged and a weapon, not that it is a shooting attack. Similarly doombolt isn't a shooting attack because of that bit of text, it is a shooting attack because of the weapon profile. There is no weapon profile for lash.<br /> <br /> And from a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span> perspective, why would it be a shooting weapon? It isn't firing a projectile or anything remotely similar. If you wanted to classify it as a type of weapon its a melee weapon with long reach since its a whip. But really, its a psychic mind affecting attack, not a shot.<br /> <br /> The only logical argument to <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span> it being a shooting attack is the fact that it would be stupidly broken if it wasn't. <br /> But of course, it already is stupidly overpowered so that debunks that argument.<br /> <br /> All that said, yes i run it as a shooting attack on the extremely rare occasions i use it simply because it is plenty powerful enough already and i don't want to get into a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> argument about it with anybody.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429551.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429551.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:24:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Where in lash of submission does it state that it is a "psychic shooting attack"?? You can quote all you want from the rules but there isnt any line saying that it actually is and that is by strict <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span>. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Well the 'burden of proof' is actually on those that follow this guideline.  Simply put, if a power is used in the 'shooting phase' and is not explicitly stated as not a psychic shooting attack (like gift of chaos in the C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>) then it is one.  What I mean is, how many psychic powers out there actually use the words "psychic shooting attack" in their definition or profile?  The only one that does is the only 5th edition codex (C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span>).  So, with older books the only guidelines we have is the limited wording in the rule book on "psychic shooting attacks".  And the ONLY guideline we have to follow is "Psychic powers that take the form of shooting attacks are very common." and "Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> So, the argument stems from the second quote found on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(329);'>Pg</span>. 50.  In which using a "psychic shooting attack" COUNTS as firing a ranged weapon.  Ergo, it can be easily interpreted that any power that is used 'instead' of shooting is an attack 'counts' as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> 4th ed codex do not use that exact line, so we have to interpret the best we can from the quotes given in the rule book to ascertain what powers are what.  I really can see where you are coming from though, but that is strict <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> that does not work (i.e. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> terminators not wearing Terminator armor, moving in your opponents assault phase,  and other strict no kidding <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> reading that leads to silly outcomes)  <br /> <br /> Personally I truly believe that this a shooting power and to say its not is one of the silliest (and extremely broken) things I have ever heard.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429563.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429563.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:49:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ padixon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div> What I mean is, how many psychic powers out there actually use the words "psychic shooting attack" in their definition or profile?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Hardly any, but this is because it is indicated by a weapon stateline on the power just like doombolt has. So based on that i'd disagree. Lash has things like its range listed in the text not on a weapon profile. It very deliberatly does not have a weapon profile, and has no charactaristics of ranged weapons other than that range and requiering <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(85);'>LOS</span>. It cannot miss, does not need to wound, and saves cannot be taken.<br /> <br /> I do not see why the burden of proof would be on those arguing that it isn't a shooting attack. It has nothing in common with shooting powers other than that it is used in the shooting phase, has range and needs <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(85);'>LOS</span>. As has been said plenty of times, there is nothing to indicate that it is a shooting attack other than some vague wording that only means anything with liberal use of inductive reasoning.<br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>So, the argument stems from the second quote found on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(329);'>Pg</span>. 50. In which using a "psychic shooting attack" COUNTS as firing a ranged weapon. Ergo, it can be easily interpreted that any power that is used 'instead' of shooting is an attack 'counts' as firing a ranged weapon.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> This is inductive reasoning and a logical fallacy. Its not <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> and is a stretch to be <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span>.<br /> <br /> To go at this from a different angle: Is a supposed psychic shooting attack that is not specified as one and has no weapon profile really a psychic shooting attack? The answer is obviously no as those are the only things that define a psychic shooting attack.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429630.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429630.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:24:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>This is inductive reasoning and a logical fallacy. Its not <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> and is a stretch to be <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span>. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I totally agree.  But that does not exclude that it is a fact that 1) there is only 2 lines that give us any guidelines on what a psychic shooting attack is, so we have to use what we got.  <br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Hardly any, but this is because it is indicated by a weapon stateline on the power just like doombolt has.</div></blockquote><br /> 2) Now where in the definition does it state that a psychic shooting attack 'has' to have a profile for a shooting weapon. It just simply has to 'counts' as a shooting attack.  If I am wrong please show me a quote or page I may correct myself on.  I listed the quotes and page numbers for my supportive stance, please do the same.<br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>I do not see why the burden of proof would be on those arguing that it isn't a shooting attack. It has nothing in common with shooting powers other than that it is used in the shooting phase, has range and needs <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(85);'>LOS</span></div></blockquote><br /> 3) What else is there that would make it 'not in common' with a shooting attack/power, you pretty much covered all the basics.  The only thing it does not do is cause wounds, but that is not required for a shooting attack.  An example would be a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(27);'>DE</span> horrorfex has all the same profiles you listed the lash has and it pins but doesn't cause any wounds like the lash yet it is a shooting weapon.   And being an auto hit weapon does not preclude it either (remember the old Zaap gun).<br /> <br /> So far all you did was show how like a shooting attack Lash is, not how it is not a shooting attack.  Please show me how it is not similar. <br /> <br /> Lets brake it down:<br /> <br /> 1) it is used in shooting phase<br /> 2) it is used instead of shooting<br /> 3) uses all the basics rules that are required for shooting (line of sight, range) don't know how it has 'nothing' in common <br /> <br /> <br /> Things that don't point towards a shooting power<br /> <br /> 1) it doesn't say "psychic shooting power" in its profile/definition <br /> <br /> Wow<br /> <br /> I apologize if I am coming off harsh or mean, but I listed the arguments with references and have yet to see any shred of that from the 'for' side.  It is the old 'this is what I think' stance that just does nothing for rules arguments.<br />  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429694.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429694.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:07:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ padixon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ How can there be any reference to what I say when there isnt anything in the rule saying it is a "psychic shooting attack"? I cant very well list something thats not there.<br /> <br /> A psychic shooing attack doesnt have to have a wepon profile either, but it has to have something in the rule saying that it is just that. Othervise it isnt, same as for all rules. Also, the burden of evidence isnt on lash to prove it isnt a "psychic shooting attack" but on whoever wants it to be to prove that it is. (wich isnt possible with the wording at the moment)<br /> <br /> I see your reasoning though but its not written in the rules.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429712.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429712.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:51:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Its not a matter of what we think, it is a matter of reading the entry without adding inferences or making assumptions. Of course there are no references. The point is that all there is is what it says. There are no references because we arn't trying to prove anything beyond what it simply says. I can restate the page number it is listed on if you like, but thats already been said so why bother?<br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>1) it is used in shooting phase <br /> 2) it is used instead of shooting <br /> 3) uses all the basics rules that are required for shooting (line of sight, range) don't know how it has 'nothing' in common</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Again, inductive reasoning.<br /> <br /> When it comes down to it the arguments are this:<br /> Against: It has a few aspects similar to shooting and is used instead of shooting.<br /> For: It doesn't say it is shooting (which many don't) and doesn't have a weapon profile (which the other shooting powers do).<br /> <br /> So, we're back to the old rule of thumb. If it doesn't say it is something, it isn't. It doesn't say it is a shooting attack and has no weapon profile, therefore it is only what it says: A ranged psychic power used in the shooting phase instead of shooting. Therefore it can be used from a fast moving rhino, etc etc.<br /> <br /> On another note: Do people think nurgle's Rot is a shooting power? It is used in the shooting phase instead of another shooting power but can be used while in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(19);'>cc</span>. It also has no weapon profile and does not miss. It also doesn't require <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(85);'>LOS</span>. I'd argue that it is not a shooting power for the same reasons i'm arguing that lash isn't: It doesn't say it is. Does anybody who thinks lash IS a shooting power think nurgle's rot isn't?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429717.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429717.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:55:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>So, we're back to the old rule of thumb. If it doesn't say it is something, it isn't. It doesn't say it is a shooting attack and has no weapon profile, therefore it is only what it says: A ranged psychic power used in the shooting phase instead of shooting. Therefore it can be used from a fast moving rhino, etc etc. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Dude, did you even read my post or just that one part you listed, show some references, I gave mine, read <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(329);'>pg</span>. 50 please and list your references <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(484);'>IT</span> does not have to have a weapon profile, please list that reference.  I just has to count as a weapon.<br /> <br /> Exactly my point, "psychic shooting attack" is a 5th edition rule.  It existed to an extent in 4th edition but never had its on specified rules.  So all the 4th ed codex just do not have that phrase, so to say all powers that do not have that phrase are not shooting attacks just opens a flood gate of abuse.   <br /> <br /> The rule book just says  "Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> Note: it doesn't list that it must have a stat line or anything of the like.  In fact it just goes on to say that you have to follow all the rules as if you fired a weapon (assaulting same target, running, etc...)<br /> <br /> So by saying that it doesn't have "psychic shooting attack" in its profile means that I can go to town with my orks, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(25);'>DA</span>, Deamon Hunters, and everyother codex with out that line who have 'shooting like' powers but clearly does not say "psychic shooting attack'.<br /> <br /> No one wants that. <br /> <br /> The whole point is if you skipped all that I wrote is this is a new rules set working with books written for an older rules set.  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> gave us a guideline on what a shooting power is, a crapy one, but a guideline none the less.  We as players are only left with interpreting what they consider what a shooting power is from that one line.  And it ONLY says "a psychic shooting attack COUNTS as firing a ranged weapon." (Emphasis mine) <br /> <br /> If your group is ok with playing it as not a shootng power, than more power to you.  <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429726.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429726.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:07:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ padixon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ok, so you do think(and interprit it the only way you think is left) it is a shooting attack and your group plays it like that. If that was the point your trying to make, doesnt make it so according to the rules though.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429731.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429731.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:18:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ OK people.  I'm here to fix your arguements.  I hope this helps.<br /> <br /> I just read the rule and you can't use it in a vehicle that has moved a distance that says it can't shoot.  Why do you ask?  That vehicle doesn't have a shooting phase.  It lost it.<br /> <br /> Also I read the power and it's used as a weapon.  If it wasn't used as a weapon it would say so.  You can use the power instead of using a shooting weapon.  If you can't use a shooting weapon in a vehicle that has moved than you can't use the power.<br /> <br /> This is not hard to understand.<br /> <br /> If someone says they can and it's a tourny adjust their sportsmanship score.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429830.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429830.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:37:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MJThurston]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Kallbrand wrote:</cite>How can there be any reference to what I say when there isnt anything in the rule saying it is a "psychic shooting attack"? I cant very well list something thats not there.<br /> <br /> A psychic shooing attack doesnt have to have a wepon profile either, but it has to have something in the rule saying that it is just that. Othervise it isnt, same as for all rules. Also, the burden of evidence isnt on lash to prove it isnt a "psychic shooting attack" but on whoever wants it to be to prove that it is. (wich isnt possible with the wording at the moment)<br /> <br /> I see your reasoning though but its not written in the rules.<br /> <br /> </div></blockquote> i'l give you 10$ if you find in any 4ed codex line - Psychic shooting attack.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429981.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/429981.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:28:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ penek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think you are right then padixon. I was looking for too solid of a definition of a psychic shooting attack and forgot we were working with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> material. There are plenty of powers that neither say they are a psychic shooting attack and don't have profiles that are probably meant to be psychic shooting attacks. So for the sake of an accurate <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span> i'd say if it is probably a psychic shooting attack if it is used in the shooting phase instead of another weapon etc.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430096.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430096.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:03:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>On p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines it says of both Lash of Submission and Doombolt:<br /> <br /> "A psyker may use this psychic power in the Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> "Doombolt may be used in the model's Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> On p.50 of the Rulebook it says of Psychic Shooting Attacks:<br /> <br /> "Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon (an assault weapon, unless specified otherwise). So, for example, the psyker must be able to see his target unit, cannot be locked in combat, or must not have run in the Shooting phase if he wishes to use a psychic shooting attack."<br /> <br /> So the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack, and is limited in the ways specified in the rulebook.</div></blockquote> So both Doombolt and Lash of Submission are psychic powers that count as ranged weapons. And a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon. Therefore the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430218.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430218.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 22:06:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Damn, dropped my popcorn.  Try to keep it civil until I can get a refill.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430231.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430231.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 1 Nov 2008 22:18:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Jayden63]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>On p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines it says of both Lash of Submission and Doombolt:<br /> <br /> "A psyker may use this psychic power in the Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> "Doombolt may be used in the model's Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> On p.50 of the Rulebook it says of Psychic Shooting Attacks:<br /> <br /> "Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon (an assault weapon, unless specified otherwise). So, for example, the psyker must be able to see his target unit, cannot be locked in combat, or must not have run in the Shooting phase if he wishes to use a psychic shooting attack."<br /> <br /> So the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack, and is limited in the ways specified in the rulebook.</div></blockquote> So both Doombolt and Lash of Submission are psychic powers that count as ranged weapons. And a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon. Therefore the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> That logic might work if it wasnt for the fact that there is nothing that says it is a psychic shooting attack(or counts as one), only that it is used instead of another ranged weapon. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430853.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430853.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:15:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Kallbrand:<br /> <br /> Okay, let me put it into an argument so that you can follow along more easily. <br /> <br /> Premise 1<br /> A Lash of Submission is a psychic power.<br /> <br /> Premise 2<br /> Using a Lash of Submission counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Premise 3<br /> Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Conclusion:<br /> Therefore, the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack.<br /> <br /> You see Kallbrand, the fact that there is something saying that the Lash of Submission is used instead of another ranged weapon means that the psychic power in question counts as a ranged weapon. <br /> <br /> As people have pointed out in this thread, the Lash of Submission is not a ranged weapon in all aspects or properties (lacks weapon profile, etc). So if the rules call for it to be used instead of another ranged weapon, then the relation between it and the kind 'range weapons' is a 'counts as' relation.  <br /> <br /> Incidentally, we could say that "counts as" is a special kind of identity, where a partial match in a special case is enough to establish identity for that case. <br /> <br /> So the fact that the rules state the Lash of Submission, a psychic power, is used instead of another ranged weapon means that the rules state that the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430991.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/430991.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:35:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Premise 1 <br /> A Lash of Submission is a psychic power. <br /> <br /> Premise 2 <br /> Using a Lash of Submission counts as firing a ranged weapon. <br /> <br /> Premise 3 <br /> Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon. <br /> <br /> Conclusion: <br /> Therefore, the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Your second premise is false. Nowhere does it say that Lash counts as firing a ranged weapon. It says that it may be used instead of using another ranged weapon meaning that either it is A) A power used instead of a ranged weapon or B) It is a power that is a ranged weapon. By <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> these are the only options, depending on how you interpret the use of "another".  Nowhere does it say anything about it counting as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Your first and third premise are true, but they do not support the conclusion. You seem to be interpreting this as if it were mathematics where a = c and b =c therefore a = b. That is not the case. Just because something counts as firing a ranged weapon doesn't mean it is a psychic shooting attack, and saying it does is, you guessed it, inductive reasoning and a logical fallacy. There are plenty of instances in this game of things counting as other things without being them. If we applied your logic to some other things like slow and purposful or chaos wings we'd be in direct defiance of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> and have serious play problems.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431041.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431041.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:46:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought:<br /> <br /> Okay, let me try again. Firstly, what "logic" or reasoning am I using? <br /> <br /> Let's take the 'a is b' vs the 'a counts as b' relations.<br /> <br /> Take a set A containing [a, b, c]. It is the same as a set B containing [a, b, c], and counts as a set C containing [b, c, d] where b and c are concerned. Let's use the traditional '=' sign for identity, and use '$' for counts as.<br /> <br /> A = B. <br /> B ≠ C<br /> A $ C|b & c.<br /> <br /> Note carefully A is always B whereas A is only C under certain conditions. <br /> <br /> So you're making a mistake in supposing that I am conflating identity with counts as when my argument is about how these relationships are different!<br /> <br /> Now, you're quite right that just because something counts as firing a ranged weapon does not mean it is a psychic shooting attack. That isn't my argument though.<br /> <br /> My argument is that a psychic power that is used instead of another ranged weapon counts as firing a ranged weapon, and if a psychic counts as firing a ranged weapon then it is a psychic shooting attack as defined. <br /> <br /> This is what you get when you combine the information on p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines and on p.50 of the Rulebook. To say that: "Nowhere does it say that Lash counts as firing a ranged weapon" is false. It says so right there on those two pages. <br /> <br /> So, the second premise is true. Let me repeat mysef:<br /> <br /> The rules say that the Lash of Submission is used instead of another ranged weapon. This is printed on p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines.<br /> <br /> It isn't a ranged weapon. This information is also known by what is printed on p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marine. It is a psychic power that has some properties in common with ranged weapons, but not all. <br /> <br /> So if it is used instead of another ranged weapon, and it is not a ranged weapon, what could it be? <br /> <br /> It's a psychic power that counts as a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> The interesting thing about this thread is that the topic is really, what are the conditions under which the Lash of Submission is a ranged weapon? <br /> <br /> Here again we check to see what the Lash of Submission has in common with ranged weapons and what it does not. It does not have a profile, although it has a range, a line of sight requirement, and causes pinning. The psychic shooting attack rules tell us it is Assault 1 unless mentioned otherwise. It does not roll to hit, or to wound, and has no <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(6);'>AP</span>. <br /> <br /> This line of sight requirement is especially important because it means that a transported model will require a fire point to use the psychic power on models outside the vehicle. Since it is used instead of a ranged weapon, and ranged weapons cannot be used while a transport is moving at Cruising speed, it cannot be used in a transport moving at Cruising speed.<br /> <br /> Otherwise a transport vehicle has no effect on the to hit, to wound, or <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(6);'>AP</span> of a weapon, and since these aspects of ranged weapons are not shared by the Lash of Submission, they are irrelevant. <br /> <br /> Edit:<br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Psychic Powers, p.88, Codex: Chaos Space Marines wrote:</cite>A psyker may only attempt to use one psychic power per turn. The only exception to this is a model with the Mark of Tzeentch, which can attempt to use up to two psychic powers per player turn (but not two powers that both <b>count as</b> firing a weapon, as models can only fire one weapon per Shooting phase).</div></blockquote> Emphasis mine.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431081.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431081.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:37:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>The rules say that the Lash of Submission is used instead of another ranged weapon. This is printed on p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines. <br /> <br /> It isn't a ranged weapon. This information is also known by what is printed on p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marine. It is a psychic power that has some properties in common with ranged weapons, but not all. <br /> <br /> So if it is used instead of another ranged weapon, and it is not a ranged weapon, what could it be? <br /> <br /> It's a psychic power that counts as a ranged weapon.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> If it is used instead of another ranged weapon, and it is not a ranged weapon, what could it be? It could be a psychic power that doesn't count as a ranged weapon. Or it could be a psychic power that counts as nothing we've ever heard of before. Or it could be made of bread for all we know. So sure, it could be a psychic power that counts as a ranged weapon, but that isn't anymore supported by what you are saying than anything else. The whole point is that we do not know. It is unspecifcied. Hence my original <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span> conclusion that this is just <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> being bad at writing rules again.<br /> <br /> EDIT in response to your EDIT: That fully supports my <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span> interpretation, but again has no impact on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span>.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431089.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431089.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:04:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought:<br /> <br /> No, it could not be a psychic power that doesn't count as a ranged weapon. It is used instead of another ranged weapon. That counts it as something that is, under certain conditions, a ranged weapon. <br /> <br /> It could not be a psychic power that counts as nothing we've ever heard of before because the text is entirely consistent with the other psychic powers that count as ranged weapons, and it refers only to rules that we have heard before (ranged weapons, etc). <br /> <br /> It could not be made of bread, since that it irrelevant to the Warhammer rules and not a term used in those rules. The relevance conditions have been established by the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> rules, so that's just disingenuous. <br /> <br /> The fact is that it must be a psychic power that counts as a ranged weapon. There is no room for competing explanations or interpretations given the relevant text, which states that it is a psychic power that counts as a ranged weapon. <br /> <br /> The fact is that the rules state this, we know that they state this, and that continually saying: "We don't know this, it's not certain, it's unspecified" is just arguing a controversy when there are no reasonable grounds for disagreement from this conclusion.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431107.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431107.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:30:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nurglitch, it is already established that we agree on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span>. But what you are claiming for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> makes no logical sense and is presumptuous inductive reasoning at best. I have given my counter argument twice now without you caring to argue against it with actual reason. You are using a lot of words but all you are doing is stating your opinion over and over. I cannot force rationality on you, and i am sure you are very convinced of your position. So, just as in any case where people refuse to be logical and instead repeat the same fallacy over and over my only option is to stop responding.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431141.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431141.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 21:57:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought:<br /> <br /> Of course I'm just repeating my position over and over. Your critique that my argument makes no 'logical sense' (whatever that means) and is 'presumptive inductive reasoning' is false. I figure that perhaps you will notice this if I explain the argument to you more clearly. <br /> <br /> Would you like to try again, from square 1? Or shall we just let it drop?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431148.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431148.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:01:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Lets give time for some others to post and see what they say. I think i fully understand your argument, but i could be wrong. In the mean time i will re-read your posts and perhaps we will try it again from square 1 later.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431165.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431165.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:25:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ What I always find humorous about <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> arguements is that they always have one basic premise; "If it doesn't say it specifically, it can not be saying it indirectly."<br /> <br /> A sign on the side of the road says;<br /> SPEED<br /> LIMIT<br /> 65<br /> Now, the sign doesn't say "Maximum speed limit is 65 US standard miles an hour as an average velocity measured at instance of travel." So, does that mean I may travel at a rate of 130 miles per hour as long as I stop after 20 minutes and wait there for 40 minutes before resuming at a velocity of 130 MPH? I only traveled 65 miles in an hour, so my average velocity was 65 miles an hour. So would I be suprised when I get pulled over for speeding?<br /> <br /> The inference is so blatently obvious <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span> should not even be needed to be contemplated. The only reason this arguement would come up is if you are either a Vulcan or are trying to squeeze out an extra attack because you are either a poor sport, or a poor tactician. Seriously, even an ambulance chasing lawyer wouldn't take this case.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431393.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431393.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Nov 2008 03:10:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Skinnattittar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Plenty of people here view it as an enjoyable intellectual exercise. Often people argue against how they actually play it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431411.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431411.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Nov 2008 03:39:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree with Nurglitch here (rare case :p).  you can't use it.  I bet if you go to a tourny you won't be able to use it either.<br /> <br /> fleet/running functions the same way.  If it is done during the shooting phase instead of shooting, it counts as a shooting attack]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431416.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431416.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Nov 2008 03:49:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ frgsinwntr]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ guyz, about what you arguing???<br /> "psychic shooting attack" - is new 5ed rule\trait. And by <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> its only presented now in new <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> dex. All old codexes don't have any kind of "psychic shooting attack" so by <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> all pre-5ed psychic powers are not PSA, even if they intended to be such thing with new rule book and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> dex.<br /> So all your arguments about are they PSA or no - is nothing.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431734.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/431734.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:26:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ penek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Then how about using the exact words that the power is used instead of using another ranged weapon. That seems pretty clear to me that the model must still be able to use a ranged weapon. A vehicle that moves 12" disallows its passengers from using ranged weapons.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432447.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432447.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:34:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ InquisitorFabius]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>Kallbrand:<br /> <br /> Okay, let me put it into an argument so that you can follow along more easily. <br /> <br /> Premise 1<br /> A Lash of Submission is a psychic power.<br /> <br /> Premise 2<br /> Using a Lash of Submission counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Premise 3<br /> Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Conclusion:<br /> Therefore, the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack.<br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Your Argument is a terrible one:<br /> Basically your argument claims that all things "firing a ranged weapon" count as "a psychic shooting attack"<br /> <br /> Lets switch it with one phrase:<br /> <br /> Premise 1<br /> A Lash of Submission is a psychic power.<br /> <br /> Premise 2<br /> Using a Lash of Submission counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Premise 3<br /> Using a bolter counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Conclusion:<br /> Therefore, shooting a Bolter is a psychic shooting attack.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The problem is not all things firing as a range weapon count as a psychic shooting attack.<br /> <br /> Yes, I will agree all of your premises are correct just as all mine are.  However the conclusion you obtained from them is not proven by them.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432695.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432695.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:27:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Timmah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>InquisitorFabius wrote:</cite>Then how about using the exact words that the power is used instead of using another ranged weapon. That seems pretty clear to me that the model must still be able to use a ranged weapon. A vehicle that moves 12" disallows its passengers from using ranged weapons.</div></blockquote><br /> There will be always two groups<br /> 1) Who go <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span><br /> 2) Who go <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(110);'>RAI</span><br /> <br /> so before <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> release <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> with clarification for PSA, there will be disputes]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432835.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432835.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:54:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ penek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You guys are really still talking about this?  If you are going to cheat and use this in a vehicle that has moved and can't shoot, then do so.  Get people mad at you and have them not play you again.<br /> <br /> Do you want to have a fun game or do you want to cheat people?  Stop being cowards and play the right way.  Get out of your vehicle after you move that 12 inches and use the whip or is that to brave for you.<br /> <br /> STOP CHEATING.  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(484);'>IT</span>'S A SHOOTING ATTACK.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432842.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432842.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:13:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MJThurston]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think everyone focuses on the wrong things here.<br /> <br /> You really need to re-read the fire point rules.<br /> <br /> Here they are:<br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Rulebook page 66 wrote:</cite>FIRE POINTS<br /> A transport vehicle may have a number of fire points<br /> defined in its entry. A fire point is a hatch or gun slit<br /> from which one or more passengers inside the vehicle<br /> can <b>fire (or use a psychic power)</b>.<br /> Unless specified differently in the vehicle’s entry, a<br /> single passenger may fire out of a fire point and the<br /> other transported models may not fire. Ranges and line<br /> of sight are measured from the fire point itself.<br /> Models firing from a vehicle count as moving if the<br /> vehicle moves, and may not fire at all if the vehicle<br /> moved at Cruising speed that turn.</div></blockquote><br /> Regardless if a psychic power is a psychic shooting attack or not when it comes to fire points using a psychic power follow the same restrictions as firing (check the bold text in the quote).<br /> You can not fire (or use a psychic power) at all from a vehicle that is moving at cruising speed if you must use a fire point.<br /> <br /> So to answer the original question.<br /> <br /> No, the lash can't be used out of a vehicle that moved at cruising speed.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432882.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432882.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:02:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Webbe]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Careful, now they are going to start arguing that it isn't a psychic power for the purposes of firing from a vehicle.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432927.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/432927.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:50:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Skinnattittar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(329);'>Pg</span>. 66 "A FIRE point is a hatch or gun slit from which one or more passengers inside the vehicle can FIRE (OR USE A PSYCHIC POWER)."<br /> <br /> Goes on to say "Models FIRING from a vehicle counts as moving if the vehicle moves, and may NOT FIRE at all if the vehicle moved at cruising speed that turn"<br /> <br /> It would seem that they started by stating that for a unit to "fire" is = to "use a psychic power". So in the rest of that rule on page 66 any time they say "fire" they intend "use a psychic power" as well. <br /> <br /> So the way I see it if the vehicle has moved at cruising speed than models inside are restricted regardless if a power is counted or called or named a "shooting power".<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433076.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433076.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:02:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Thr33ifbyair]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Timmah:<br /> <br /> No, the argument that I offered was both <i>valid</i>, meaning that the conclusion followed logically from the premises, and <i>sound</i>, meaning that if the premises were true, then the conclusion must also be true. <br /> <br /> In your criticism you have substituted a true premises for a false premise; a bolter does not count as a ranged weapon: it is a ranged weapon! Since you have done this, it should be no surprise that the conclusion of the argument is clearly false, since you've basically pulled a bait-and-switch, critiquing my argument by constructing a different one that doesn't apply to Warhammer 40,000. Nonetheless, you will note that both arguments are logically valid. Since the conclusion of a valid argument will follow from its premises, the truth of the premises guarantees that the conclusion of my argument is true. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433133.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433133.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:57:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hah someone took a logic class. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433138.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433138.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:00:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Thr33ifbyair]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Someone's <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(519);'>TA</span>'d logic classes. <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433143.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433143.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:03:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ethics of logic.... Hardest paper I ever had to write. Even though my head hurt at the end I felt like a genius. A.<br /> <br /> Clearly off topic hah]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433154.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/433154.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:14:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Thr33ifbyair]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>Timmah:<br /> In your criticism you have substituted a true premises for a false premise; a bolter does not count as a ranged weapon: it is a ranged weapon!  </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> So, ranged weapons don't count as ranged weapons?<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434297.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434297.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:51:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Timmah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Timmah:<br /> <br /> Correct. Ranged weapons <i>are</i> ranged weapons. <br /> <br /> For ranged weapons to count as ranged weapons, the former would have to share some, but not all, properties in common with the latter in some special case.  <br /> <br /> For example, Mega Armoured Nobz <i>count as</i> two models for the purpose of transported in Trukks, but they <i>are not</i> two models as defined by the rules. <br /> <br /> If we take the denominator to be the number of properties in common, and the numerator to be the number of properties of relevance, then we can say that one thing is another iff x/x, and one thing counts as another iff x-y/x & y &gt; 0.<br />  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434362.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434362.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Nov 2008 14:40:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>Kallbrand:<br /> <br /> Okay, let me put it into an argument so that you can follow along more easily. <br /> <br /> Premise 1<br /> A Lash of Submission is a psychic power.<br /> <br /> Premise 2<br /> Using a Lash of Submission counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Premise 3<br /> Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> Conclusion:<br /> Therefore, the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack.<br /> <br />  </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Fine, let me put your argument a way you will hopefully understand.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> For example, a person may say the following syllogism is valid, when in fact it is not:<br /> <br />    1. All birds have beaks.<br />    2. That creature has a beak.<br />    3. Therefore that creature is a bird.<br /> <br /> "That creature" may well be a bird, but the conclusion does not follow from the premises. Certain other animals may also have beaks. Errors of this type occur because people reverse a premise. In this case, "All birds have beaks" is converted to "All beaked animals are birds." The reversed premise is plausible because few people are aware of any instances of beaked creature besides birds—but this premise is not the one that was given. In this way, the deductive fallacy is formed by points that may individually appear logical, but when placed together are shown to be incorrect.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434436.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434436.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Nov 2008 15:57:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Timmah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Timmah:<br /> <br /> Your criticism fails. Here's why:<br /> <br /> We can restate your syllogism using a propositonal logic.<br /> <br /> P1. B -&gt; K<br /> P2. K<br /> C3. B <br /> <br /> Notice that the first premise is equivalent to: &quot;If Bird, then Beak&quot;. So if we find something with a beak, and conclude that it is a bird, then we have committed the fallacy called, among other things, affirming the consequent. <br /> <br /> Why is affirming the consequent a fallacy? Well, it's because the logical connective (the material conditional) joining things with the property of being birds to things with the property of having beaks has a specific direction. <br /> <br /> Where your criticism fails to hold is in supposing that my argument shares this invalid form, and in particular that my argument involves quantification in the formation of its premises. This is false. Your criticism that my argument affirms the consequent is a straw man. See my following post for details. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434527.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434527.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:41:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You can try and go into it all you want.<br /> <br /> But in the end your just saying that:<br /> <br /> A psychic shooting attack is the ONLY way for a psychic attack to count as firing a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> The reversed premise is plausible because few people are aware of any psychic abilities that are not shooting attacks—<b>but this premise is not the one that was given</b><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> This is the same in the example I gave as you would be saying ONLY birds have beaks.<br /> <br /> Which there is no proof of this.<br /> <br /> The reversed premise is plausible because few people are aware of any instances of beaked creature besides birds—but this premise is not the one that was given<br /> <br /> <br /> So for this argument to be valid you would need another premise that said:<br /> <br /> All psychic abilities that count as firing a ranged  weapon are considered psychic shooting attacks.<br /> <br /> However there is no proof of this as no where is it stated in the rules.<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434569.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434569.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:29:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Timmah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Right, forgot to add the legend, and obviously more dots need to be connected for the proof to be accepted. So...<br /> <br /> The following is a derivation, a form of logical proof, showing that the conclusion follows from the premises with deductive validity.<br /> <br /> Symbols<br /> L = Lash of Submission<br /> P = Psychic Power<br /> R = Ranged Weapon<br /> S = Psychic Shooting Attack<br /> -&gt; Material Conditional (if...then...)<br /> & (also ',') Conjuction (...and...)<br /> <br /> P1. L, L -&gt; P<br /> P2. L -&gt; R<br /> P3. P & R -&gt; S<br /> 4. L (1, Simplification)<br /> 5. P (1 & 4, Modus Ponens)<br /> 6. R (2 & 4, Modus Ponens)<br /> 7. P & R (5 & 6, Conjunction)<br /> C. S (3 & 7, Modus Ponens)<br /> <br /> Premise 1 is true, because there is a Lash of Submission, and it is listed under Psychic Powers on p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines. The Lash of Submission is a Psychic Power. This is usually where people muck up, particularly if they never advanced past syllogistic in their understanding of logic. 'Is' in English is tricky because it means so many things (identity, predication, existence, membership, etc), and the exact sense is almost always contextual. In this case the sense is membership.  <br /> <br /> Premise 2 is true, because a Lash of Submission is used instead of another ranged weapon, also mentioned on p.88, and so if you are using a Lash of Submission instead of another Ranged Weapon, then you are using a Ranged Weapon. Since the Lash of Submission is not a Ranged Weapon, and it is being used as one, it counts as a Ranged Weapon: so if you are using a Lash of Submission, then you are using a Ranged Weapon <i>under those conditions</i>. This is how the 'counts as' relation works, as I explained earlier in the thread.<br /> <br /> Premise 3 is true, because, well, it says &quot;Using a psychic shooting attack counts as firing a ranged weapon&quot; on p.50 of the rulebook. Notice that under a propositional logic that the 'counts as' relation conforms to a material conditional, since the information making Premise 2 true licenses us to say that we can replace A with B where the condition of material A is satisfied.<br /> <br /> Line 4 follows from Premise 1 via the logical rule of simplification. <br /> <br /> Line 5 follows from Premise 1 and Line 4, technically from Premise 1 alone, but derivations using at least two lines are clearer and easier to follow. If we use a Lash of Submission, and in using a Lash of Submission use a Psychic power, it follows that the Lash of Submission is a Psychic power.<br /> <br /> Line 6 as line 5.<br /> <br /> Line 7 follows from lines 5 and 6, connecting the first two premises together in a form that clearly satisfies the antecedent of the third premise.<br /> <br /> The conclusion, that the Lash of Submission is a Psychic Shooting Attack, follows from Premise 3 and line 7 via the same triviality that licensed us to be completely certain 5 & 6 followed from earlier lines. <br /> <br /> To reiterate, the conclusion follows from the premises with full deductive validity via the application of the simplest logical principles. The premises are true, and therefore the conclusion is sound, and fully supported by the text.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434591.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/434591.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:47:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Unfortunently Premise 2 is your personal opinion and not supported by any logic, making your whole reasoning fail. <br /> <br /> There is nothing to support "used instead of another ranged weapon" actually meaning that it is in itself a ranged weapon. You fail cause you just state "so if you are using a Lash of Submission instead of another Ranged Weapon, then you are using a Ranged Weapon" wich is totally unsupported by the rules.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435643.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435643.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:37:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think it is a psychic shooting power for the following reason:<br /> <br /> There's 7 psychic powers in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> codex.  Warptime and Gift of Chaos are not done in the shooting.  That leaves 5 that are done in the shooting phase.  Two of them have a range, strength, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(6);'>Ap</span> value and Type listed (Doombolt and Bolt of Change).  They also have the following sentence, "When used, doombolt/bolt of change counts as a ranged weapon with the following profile (roll to hit and wound as normal): "<br /> <br /> Wind of Chaos has also a range, no cover/save allowed, quasi-strength (similar to "real" weapons in some instances) and has the sentence, "...this is resolved in the same way as firing a template weapon."<br /> <br /> So for those 3, can we agree that they are "psychic shooting attacks"  even though the codex never tells us they are "psychic shooting attacks"?  (bear with me, I know this isn't the problem)<br /> They all say,"May be used in the shooting phase instead of another ranged attack."<br /> <br /> Nurgle's Rot also states that.  It also has a range, S and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(6);'>AP</span> value, though it lacks a type (template/assault/rapid fire) and but it says nothing about counting as a ranged weapon.  It also breaks a core rule of a shooting attack in that the caster may be in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(19);'>CC</span>, the target(s) may be in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(19);'>CC</span> or neither/both can be in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(19);'>CC</span>.  Is Nurgle's Rot a psychic shooting attack with a codex specific exemption from the core shooting rules?  It has all the general rules of a psychic shooting attack with a specific exemption added on.  Seems like a shooting psychic attack to me.<br /> <br /> Finally, Lash.  It also is used instead of another ranged weapon in the shooting phase.  It has a range, but does no direct damage (therefor no S/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(6);'>AP</span>/Type).  No where in the rules is it stated explicitly what makes a psychic power a "psychic shooting attack."  We are left to infer which powers constitute a "psychic shooting attack."  There is no <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>RAW</span> to tell us either way.  Three of the five are pretty clearly psychic shooting attacks, a fourth holds most of the same characteristics (with the caveat that it has a codex specific exemption from a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span> rule) and the fifth is close enough for me to say it is also a psychic shooting effect.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435720.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435720.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:50:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ budro]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think the logic behind the idea that you are not able to fire out of a vehicle moving at cruising speed is that it is moving fast enough and is so bumpy that every unit inside has to hold onto something or sit down in order not to fall over. <br /> <br /> So for the duration of the movement phase they are preparing to stand or picking themselves up. <br /> <br /> No shooting no psychic powers im busy with the "jesus handle".<br /> <br /> The rules as stated on page 66 lead me to believe and understand that you substitute the word FIRE  with Psychic power where applicable.<br /> <br /> This is at least how everyone at my <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(38);'>FLGS</span> play.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435727.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435727.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:55:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Thr33ifbyair]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Kallbrand:<br /> <br /> No, the second premise of my argument is based solely on information found in Codex: Chaos Space Marine, making it fact, and how you don't follow the logic is inexplicable. Let me try and break it down for you.<br /> <br /> Premise 2 is true, because a Lash of Submission is used instead of another ranged weapon, also mentioned on p.88. I quote:<br /> <br /> "A psyker may use this psychic power in the Shooting phase instead of using another ranged weapon." <br /> <br /> As budro has pointed out, this sort of construction is used all the psychic shooting attacks in Codex: Chaos Space Marines, including Doombolt, Bolt of Change, Wind of Chaos, Nurgle's Rot, and the Lash of Submssion.<br /> <br /> If you are using a Lash of Submission instead of another Ranged Weapon, then you are using a Ranged Weapon.<br /> <br /> That's just a basic fact of English. Here's the definition of 'Another' from dictionary.com:<br /> <br /> –adjective<br /> 1. 	being one more or more of the same; further; additional: another piece of cake.<br /> 2. 	different; distinct; of a different period, place, or kind: at another time; another man.<br /> 3. 	very similar to; of the same kind or category as: What we need today is another Thomas Jefferson.<br /> –pronoun<br /> 4. 	one more; an additional one: That first hot dog tasted so good I'd like another.<br /> 5. 	a different one; something different: going from one house to another.<br /> 6. 	one like the first: one copy for her and another for him.<br /> 7. 	a person other than oneself or the one specified: He told her he loved another. <br /> <br /> "Another", in that sentence, is being used as an adjective to "ranged weapon". If it is in the first sense, then the Lash of Submission is, in some special way, a Ranged Weapon. If it is in the second sense, then the Lash of Submission is being used in the place of a Ranged Weapon. If it is in the third sense, then the Lash of Submission is being used similarly to a Ranged Weapon. <br /> <br /> Since the Lash of Submission is a Psychic Power and not a Ranged Weapon, and it is either a special case of a Ranged Weapon, being used as a Ranged Weapon, or being used similarly as a Ranged Weapon: the only valid logical conclusion that we can make is that the sentence means the Lash of Submission counts as a Ranged Weapon.<br /> <br /> The properties of being used in the shooting phase and being used instead of another ranged weapon are sufficient for the Lash of Submission to count as a Ranged Weapon, but they are further corroborated by other properties that the Lash of Submission shares with Ranged Weapons such as range, line of sight, and pinning. <br /> <br /> Furthermore, the truth of this deduction is corroborated by other remarks on the same page, such as the aforementioned identical sentence constructions used in the rules of powers that are exemplars of Psychic Shooting Attacks, and the text at the beginning of the page:<br /> <br /> "A psyker may only attempt to use one psychic power per turn. The only exception to this is a model with the Mark of Tzeentch, which can attempt to use up to two psychic powers per player turn (but not two powers that both <b>count as</b> firing a weapon, as models can only fire one weapon per Shooting phase)." Emphasis mine. <br /> <br /> In fact, the premise (2) that the Lash of Submission counts as a shooting attack is not only supported by the text and valid deductive logic, it is demanded by it. It is true. <br /> <br /> So, actually, there is something to support the reading of "used instead of another ranged weapon" as equivalent to "count as a ranged weapon" in the Warhammer rules. There are several things, the first of which is the English language, the second is logic, <br /> <br /> I do not fail when I state that "so if you are using a Lash of Submission instead of another Ranged Weapon, then you are using a Ranged Weapon" because I am merely citing the only conclusion about the meaning of that sentence that the rules support 100%. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435792.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435792.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:50:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Again, your reasoning is flawed because you state things according to your own reasoning without derive to them, that is what makes them flawed.<br /> <br /> "The properties of being used in the shooting phase and being used instead of another ranged weapon are sufficient for the Lash of Submission to count as a Ranged Weapon" Is your own reasoning without making it true.<br /> <br /> "A psyker may only attempt to use one psychic power per turn. The only exception to this is a model with the Mark of Tzeentch, which can attempt to use up to two psychic powers per player turn (but not two powers that both count as firing a weapon, as models can only fire one weapon per Shooting phase)."  Actually only disproves your reasoning simply by showing that the rules actually uses the wording COUNTS <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(400);'>AS</span> in certain cases.<br /> <br /> So you may actually write all that text and take examples that arent really relevant and in the end your reasoning is flawed and fails because at one point or antoher you come to your own conclusion by just stating something is.(Wich may or may not be false, but it still ruins your reasoning).<br /> <br /> <br /> Budros reasoning like he himself states is based on what isnt in the rules and we all know, whats not there isnt.. there are no hidden easter eggs. Unfortunently that leaves it in no mans land, not beeing anything we know of. (except that it is a psychic power that is used instead of another ranged weapon).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435919.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/435919.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:07:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kallbrand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite><br /> <br /> Line 5 follows from Premise 1 and Line 4, technically from Premise 1 alone, but derivations using at least two lines are clearer and easier to follow. If we use a Lash of Submission, and in using a Lash of Submission use a Psychic power, it follows that the Lash of Submission is a Psychic power.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Ok, so lash is a Psychic Power.  True<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite><br /> <br /> Line 6 as line 5.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> And lash counts as firing a ranged weapon.  Also true<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite><br /> <br /> Line 7 follows from lines 5 and 6, connecting the first two premises together in a form that clearly satisfies the antecedent of the third premise.<br /> <br /> The conclusion, that the Lash of Submission is a Psychic Shooting Attack, follows from Premise 3 and line 7 via the same triviality that licensed us to be completely certain 5 & 6 followed from earlier lines. <br />   </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> And here is where you are wrong.  Just because Lash is a psychic power and counts as firing a ranged weapon does not mean it counts as a psychic shooting attack.  Because again you are claiming that all psychic powers that count as firing a ranged weapon count as a psychic shooting attack.  And as I stated before you can not prove this.  <br /> <br /> (a)         so      (b)<br /> Rain makes it wet out<br /> therefore<br /> (b)         so         (a)<br /> It is wet out, it rained out<br /> <br /> This is a logical fallacy because again there are other ways for it to be wet outside.<br /> <br /> Just as there can be things other than psychic shooting attacks that are psychic powers that count as having fired a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> edit:<br /> <br /> Rereading your post I see what your main problem is.<br /> <br /> You are reasoning that because something counts as firing a ranged weapon, makes it a ranged weapon.  However no matter how weird it sounds there is nothing to prove this.  Nowhere does it state in the rules that things firing as a ranged weapon count as a ranged weapon.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436130.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436130.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:40:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Timmah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>You are reasoning that because something counts as firing a ranged weapon, makes it a ranged weapon. However no matter how weird it sounds there is nothing to prove this. Nowhere does it state in the rules that things firing as a ranged weapon count as a ranged weapon.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Yes, this is what i was failing to get across originally. You use lash instead of firing a ranged weapon. You also run instead of using a ranged weapon. If the premise Nurglitch is claiming were true, then running would also count as firing a ranged weapon, which it clearly isn't.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436151.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436151.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 00:18:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Drudge Dreadnought:<br /> <br /> If the Lash of Submission was used instead of a ranged weapon, like Run, then you might have a leg to stand on. Actually, the Lash of Submission is used instead of <b>another</b> ranged weapon. <br /> <br /> And, as I've pointed out, the Lash of Submission shares this indicative first sentence with psychic powers that are unquestionably Psychic Shooting Attacks, and shares in common with Ranged Weapons a range requirement, a line of sight requirement, and causes pinning. <br /> <br /> The text states that the Lash of Submission counts as a ranged weapon. I've quoted the text, shown how it is properly read, I've connected all the dots.     <br /> <br /> Timmah:<br /> <br /> So, we can chalk you up as unable to understand and follow basic propositional logic? The logic is valid, the premises are true. If you don't accept the conclusion is true, then the problem is with you.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436300.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436300.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 02:10:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nurglitch wrote:</cite>Drudge Dreadnought:<br /> <br /> If the Lash of Submission was used instead of a ranged weapon, like Run, then you might have a leg to stand on. Actually, the Lash of Submission is used instead of <b>another</b> ranged weapon. <br /> <br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Actually the another part that you have bolded could mean any number of things.  Such as a model which has 2 shooting attacks.  SO instead of firing another one of their shooting attacks they can use a psychic test.  (As stated in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span>)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(17);'>Btw</span> just because your premises are true does not make your conclusion true.  Your premises need to prove your conclusion which yours do not.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436616.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436616.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:52:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Timmah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Timmah:<br /> <br /> Actually the premises I provided do prove the conclusion when arranged in the argument that I have given. Apparently you've unfamiliar with logical proofs. Allow me to explain.<br /> <br /> In a logical proof such as a derivation, the premises are joined to the conclusion using valid rules of inference to insure that each step is mechanically proved by preceding steps. Where the conclusion follows from the premises, the argument is called 'valid'. If the premises are true, and the argument is valid, then the conclusion is necessarily also true; this is a property of arguments called 'soundness'. I provided such a proof, which is valid, and uses true premises. The conclusion that the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack has been proved to follow from the premises with deductive validity. It is true.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436718.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/436718.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:19:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No need to treat me like I am stupid.  I know exactly how your argument works.  <br /> And as I stated before the problem with your argument is that you believe Lash is considered a ranged weapon solely because it fires as if it is one.<br /> <br /> Whether this is true or not makes your argument valid or invalid.  As I have stated previously I do not believe that Lash is considered a range weapon and you have stated you believe the opposite.<br /> <br /> We are not going to come to a solid conclusion on this unless there is a definitive answer to that point.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/437029.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/437029.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:37:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Timmah]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Timmah:<br /> <br /> I'm not treating you like you're stupid. That would involve me ceasing to post. Instead, I'm treating you like an intelligent human being, which is why I'm pointing out that it is stupid for an intelligent human being such as you to say you understand how the argument I've given works and yet believe that the conclusion of that argument is not sound. <br /> <br /> I do not believe that the Lash of Submission counts as a ranged weapon solely because it is used instead of another ranged weapon, though that is sufficient to be justified in that belief. I believe that the Lash of Submission count as a ranged weapon because it is used instead of another ranged weapon, in the shooting phase, using a ranged, line of sight, and causes pinning, because the language used in its description corroborates with non-problematic psychic shooting attacks, and thus with the words at the beginning of the section saying that some psychic powers count as ranged weapons. <br /> <br /> Now, quick logic review: truth has little to do with validity. There are entirely valid arguments whose premises are completely false, and whose conclusion is therefore false as a result. Validity is about the form of the argument, such that if a value like truth is inputted into that structure, we are guaranteed a particular value for the results. <br /> <br /> Whether the 2nd premise of my argument is true or not affects whether my argument is sound or not (soundness: whether the truth of the conclusion follows from the truth of the premises). Put crudely: True + Valid = Sound. The form of the argument is valid. That's a matter of fact. The premises of the argument are true. That's also a matter of fact. <br /> <br /> Given that we have these two facts, we are able to derive a definitive answer to whether the Lash of Submission is a psychic shooting attack: it is.<br /> <br /> If you knew exactly how my argument works, such that you knew how true premises interact with a proof of validity such as a derivation, and I made no errors in that derivation (I haven't, the point of derivations is that they allow you to check this), then you would agree with the conclusion. <br /> <br /> The fact that you insist the problem with my argument is that I believe the Lash of Submission to be considered a ranged weapon solely because it fires as if it is one proves that you neither know exactly how my argument works, nor what my argument is. <br /> <br /> After all, my argument is not that the Lash of Submission is considered a ranged weapon solely because it is fired as if it is one. <br /> <br /> My argument for the truth of Premise 2 is that the Lash of Submission count as a ranged weapon because it is used instead of another ranged weapon, and it is not a ranged weapon. This leaves us with the 'counts as' relation quoted on p.88 of Codex: Chaos Space Marines.<br /> <br /> One criticism that has been raised in this thread is that Running does not count as a ranged weapon despite being used instead of a ranged weapon and not being a ranged weapon. So since Running does not count as a ranged weapon, neither should the Lash of Submission.<br /> <br /> But this criticism depends on the fallacious grounds that the words 'a' and 'another' are somehow interchangeable, as if an reflexive adjective could magically become the indefinite article. If Running was used instead of another ranged weapon, while not being a ranged weapon, then it would count as a ranged weapon. But the first premise of that argument is false, since Running is done instead of firing, not instead of firing another ranged weapon. Were it otherwise, a Monstrous Creature could run and fire a ranged weapon; this would be cool, but it is false. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/437055.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/437055.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:02:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nurglitch]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ it says that troops mounted in a vehicle cannot fire, only the vehicle itself can.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/437209.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/437209.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Nov 2008 23:19:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ BloodDeathAssault]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Radda Radda Radda I dun Radda. <br /> <br /> <br /> Chowder...Cartoon network?... anyone?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/438838.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/438838.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:42:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Thr33ifbyair]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Lash of Submission and how it interacts with transports. </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Timmah wrote:</cite>No need to treat me like I am stupid.  I know exactly how your argument works.  <br /> And as I stated before the problem with your argument is that you believe Lash is considered a ranged weapon solely because it fires as if it is one.<br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> As pointed out multiple times in this thread, the codex states that Lash is a ranged weapon (C:<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span>, p.80).<br /> <br /> "...instead of using <b>another</b> ranged weapon."<br /> <br /> This makes Lash into a ranged weapon.  Had the rule instead stated "...instead of using <b>a</b> ranged weapon" then there would be some good arguments to the contrary.<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/439334.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/221376/439334.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:10:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Democratus]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>