<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Chaos Sorcerers and Shields"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/93.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Chaos Sorcerers and Shields"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In the new <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> book on page 106 it states that Sorcerers can use magic shields like "other champions of chaos."<br /> <br /> My question is, can they use mundane shields because of this? There is no option for mundane shields in their profile...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/459813.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/459813.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:14:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MascisMan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nope only the magic kind]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/459821.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/459821.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:29:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There is still a strong debate against the notion that they can take magic shields. They do not have the option for mundane shields and the only reference to magic shields for sorcerers is in the description of sorcerers but no where else in the rules. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/461402.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/461402.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:52:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I dont understand how it could be understood any other way.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/461442.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/461442.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:49:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Because some people seem to believe that the reference to sorcerers is meant to encompass characters with the book of secrets of something that lets them cast. It's a very strained argument.<br /> <br /> Of course, any halfway decent rule writer could have simply given Chaos Sorcs the option of shields.....]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/461550.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/461550.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:08:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Because there is a clear difference between rules and descriptions. That section is more of a description of the sorcerer rather than how the sorcerer is supposed to be played. The Sorcerers do not have the option to take a mundane shield so they cannot take a magical shield. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/462777.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/462777.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:42:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Oh, I agree there is no shield option, but I disagree on the description "clearly" not being rules.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/462798.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/462798.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:02:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Um that is a rules section. It is telling you how to use your wizard. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/462844.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/462844.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:50:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Canaan wrote:</cite>Um that is a rules section. It is telling you how to use your wizard. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I agree, the area in the book where this is stated is defending why sorcerers have chaos armor. It specifically says that the spellcaster can wear armor and shields just like champions of chaos. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/463508.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/463508.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:41:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MascisMan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It is clearly stated in the designers notes for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> website that the sorcerers may take shields.<br /> <br /> Sigh.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/463715.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/463715.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 3 Dec 2008 03:04:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ fazz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>fazz wrote:</cite>It is clearly stated in the designers notes for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> website that the sorcerers may take shields.<br /> <br /> Sigh.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> But on this page, it specifically says that sorcerers can <u>not</u> use magic shields:<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?categoryId=400023&pIndex=1&aId=10100004&start=2" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.games-workshop.com/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>gws</span>/content/article.jsp?categoryId=400023&pIndex=1&aId=10100004&start=2</a><br /> <br /> Now Im really confused. <br /> <br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/464948.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/464948.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:23:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MascisMan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The link doesn't work for me, but I am guessing it is the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> for the old Chaos mortals book.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465064.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465064.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:40:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Canaan wrote:</cite>Um that is a rules section. It is telling you how to use your wizard. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> It describes the unusual characteristics of chaos sorcerers but no where in that section does it state that they can be equiped with shields even though they normally cannot be equipped with them. For the book to override the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span> it needs to have language indicated that it is. <br /> <br /> On a side note, only official <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQs</span> can really be used to determine intent from the developers. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465467.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465467.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:46:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Is the same as Vampires.<br /> <br /> the Magic Item list specifically states Vampires and Necromancers may select pieces of Magic Armour, despite (without a bloodline power) the choice to take a mundane equivalent.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465485.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465485.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:56:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mad Doc Grotsnik]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ However the Warriors of Chaos Book does not have that statement or anything similar to that statement. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465502.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465502.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:15:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So then, at this point I only have one question.<br /> Why would it say that chaos sorcs can use magic armor AND SHIELDS?<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465596.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465596.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:38:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Because “Sorcerer” has two meanings- one of which is any Chaos model that casts spells.  Which can include things like Daemon Princes, Exalted Champions with the Book of Secrets, and special characters.<br /> <br /> The particular section in question is talking about the use of magic by chaos in general, not just the specific unit from the army list called a "Chaos Sorcerer".]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465887.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/465887.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Dec 2008 19:11:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ok then by that logic the chaos sorcerer is indeed a sorcerer as described in this section. Wherin it states a sorcerer can use magic armor and shields. Correct? Or am I missing something?<br /> I know this is pretty pointless. You guys will see it your way and we will see it our way. Until an official <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> comes out it is pretty pointless to argue either way I suppose. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/466812.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/466812.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:31:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Please note that I’m not sure if I count as “you guys”.  My initial take was that it definitely wasn’t allowed, based on what I perceive as ambiguity in the rule, and the precedent set by the previous codex.  Presently I’ve started to lean more towards your perspective, and am really on the fence.  I do hope they <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> it to make it 100% clear.<br /> <br /> I don't think it's pointless to discuss; I think both points of view have their merits, and it's important for people to know about the issue and be conversant with the opposing side so they're not caught by surprise or annoyed if they run into an opponent who plays it differently.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467174.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467174.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:47:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The wording no where states that they can select magic shields from the magic items section. it states "Sorcerers are unusual in that they wear chaos armor and use magic shields and magic armor just like other champions of chaos." They are making a statement that describes the differences between chaos sorcerers and other wizards. No where in that statement does it give them permission to select a magic shield even though they normally cannot select one.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467219.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467219.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:12:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So I guess saying that they wear it is saying that they arent alowed to wear it?<br /> It really makes no mind to me. I play <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> but wouldnt give my sorcs shields in the 1st place. However Im sure there are those who would. <br /> The problem is they describe sorcs using specificly magic shields in a rules section. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467242.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467242.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:24:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ And in the sentence immediately preceding it, they tell you that a “sorcerer” is any chaos model which can cast spells.  The fact that those two sentences are right next to each other is what makes some folks think that shield comment is meant as a catch-all for the other guys.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467279.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467279.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:44:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There is a period between right? I dont have my codex on me. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467309.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467309.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:01:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Actually, by logical analysis, it does.<br /> <br /> A=B<br /> B=C<br /> A=C<br /> <br /> All Chaos Sorcerors are sorcerors<br /> All sorcerors are shield users (may use magic shields)<br /> All Chaos Sorcerors are shield users (may use magic shields)<br /> <br /> Is this sufficient to overcome the normal limitations?<br /> I believe so and would have no problem with any <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> player equipping their Chaos Sorceror with a magic shield.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467312.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467312.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:02:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>jmurph wrote:</cite><br /> All sorcerors are shield users (may use magic shields)<br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> This is incorrect. No where does it indicate that they are shield users or that they all have the option to take a magic shield. Premise 2 should be <br /> <br /> Some sorcerers are shield users (may use magic shields)<br /> <br /> This will require you to add premise 3 which is:<br /> <br /> Models that have the option to take a mundane shield can also take a magic shield.<br /> <br /> which give the conclusion<br /> <br /> Those sorcerers that can take a mundane shield can take a magic shield.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467352.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467352.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:32:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ok, but now you are adding words to the codex. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467355.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467355.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:34:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ That’s part of the ambiguity.  Both of them added a word. Jmurph added “all”, and negativemoney added “some”.  Part of the problem is that the army book uses neither.  One sentence gives a very broad definition of “sorcerer” which includes several different types of models with very different capabilities and equipment options.  The immediate next sentence makes a broad statement about the fact that “sorcerers” can use armor and shields and still cast spells.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467383.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467383.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:49:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I doubt a rules boy email would help?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467408.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467408.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 17:06:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Not for the purposes of this discussion, at least, for two reasons.<br /> <br /> 1. Rules boys emails aren’t printed in a nice book with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>’s logo on them for you to show your opponent at an event.  <br /> 2. Their track record for inconsistency and illogic has been pretty terrible for the nine years I’ve been playing and participating on online discussions.  <br /> <br /> There have been some indications in the last few months that (on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> side in the US, at least) <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> is trying to improve consistency from the Rules Boys (now “boy” in the US), which is nice for impartial third-party resolution of a dispute in your local group, but doesn’t actually tell you what the designers were thinking, and even if it did, doesn’t resolve the problem of how to resolve the issue in a pick up or tournament game with a stranger.  <br /> <br /> Since we’re mostly strangers from around the world on this board, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(152);'>YMTC</span> forums are intended to help us hash out what the rules actually say and try to understand them better, to help us resolve issues better locally.  For friendly games with people you know well, you’re rarely going to need to wrangle as much as we do online.  But it helps a lot in terms of understanding and being able to communicate about these issues with strangers when you play against them.<br /> <br /> Generally speaking, in those situations your best bet is to discuss it before the game, ask the event organizer before the tournament, and hope for the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>.  <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467937.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/467937.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Dec 2008 23:14:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Negativemonkey: I think you assume too much into the rule. The book reads:<br /> &lt;quote&gt;<br /> The term 'Sorceror' is used to describe Wizards who follow the Chaos Gods. Sorcerors are unusual in that they wear Chaos armor and use magic shields just like other Champions of Chaos.<br /> &lt;/quote&gt;<br /> <br /> Notice it doesn't say some. Its says Sorcerors which was just defined in the previous sentence to describe "Wizards who follow the Chaos Gods". Thus Wizards who follow the Chaos Gods wear Chaos armor and use magic shields.<br /> <br /> My initial logical analysis stands, I think.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/469908.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/469908.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:07:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yup<br /> It really cannot be read any other way.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/469976.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/469976.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:30:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ jsmurph, the word all is never mentioned in the rules and is something that you have just added in. Also it says that they use not that they can purchase from the magic item list. In order for someone to purchase that item they need to be able to first take a mundane item of the same armor type. <br /> <br /> In this situation there is no provision for that to happen so a chaos sorcerer or an exalted sorcerer would not be able to select a shield from the magic armor list.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470244.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470244.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:20:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If I say you can use my pen to write something down; what does that mean? Does it mean you have access to my pen? ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470338.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470338.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:28:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Canaan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I typed the language directly from the book. I have corrected my post to remove the extraneous all. Same result.<br /> <br /> Your statement is the basic rule which governs unless superceded by an army specific rule (see also Vampire Counts). The rule in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> says that "Sorcerors ... use magic shields." Chaos sorcerors may use magic shields (contrary to the normal rule) despite not having the option to take a normal shield because the army book tells us this.<br /> <br /> Is your argument is that they may use them but not purchase them?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470354.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470354.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:46:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Canaan wrote:</cite>If I say you can use my pen to write something down; what does that mean? Does it mean you have access to my pen? </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> It just means that if I had the option to possess your pen I can write with it. How ever your statement indicates to me that your pen might be in your car or even lost. There is no way to tell from your statement that I can actually take your pen as you only give me permission to use. <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>jmurph wrote:</cite>Your statement is the basic rule which governs unless superceded by an army specific rule (see also Vampire Counts).</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I completely agree with that. The Vampire Counts rules explicitly state they may select armor and shields even though they normally cannot. This is a clear difference to the Sorcerer description in the Warriors of Chaos Book.<br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>jmurph wrote:</cite>Chaos sorcerors may use magic shields (contrary to the normal rule) despite not having the option to take a normal shield because the army book tells us this. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Once again you are adding words that are not there. No where does it states it overrides the rules in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span> regarding magic armor. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470421.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470421.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:59:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It does not have to state it explicitly. A rule may implicitly supersede another. The rule for Chaos sorcerors states they may wear armor and use shields. Do you disagree with this? If so, do you believe Chaos sorcerors may not wear armor? Why? Use shields (notice I said nothing about selecting magical shields....)? Why?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470460.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470460.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:53:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> book general section on magic defines a Sorcerer as any chaos Wizard (which the main rulebook defines as any model which casts spells).  This means that a Sorcerer includes the Chaos Sorcerer and Exalted Sorcerer units, also Daemon Princes, Exalted Champions and Chaos Lords with the Book of Secrets, and any Special Character who casts spells.  This is a very broad category.  The immediate next sentence states that sorcerers are unusual in that they wear chaos armor, magic armor, and magic shields.  <br /> <br /> This creates a contradiction between the general statement on page 106, and the specific prohibition from the main rulebook on a character taking magic armor or a magical shield if he does not have access to the mundane equivalent.  <br /> <br /> Now, if you read the statement about sorcerers and magic shields and armor as a general catch-all not meant to violate the rulebook prohibition, then you break no rule.  A Chaos Lord or Exalted Champ with a Book of Secrets can take a magic shield or magic armor and still cast in it, because he has the option for the mundane equivalent AND has a rule saying he can still cast while wearing it.  A Daemon Prince (who is a sorcerer) cannot take a magic shield or armor, because he lacks the mundane option.  A Chaos Sorcerer or Exalted Sorcerer can take magic armor and still cast in it (as he has the appropriate rule and the mundane option), but can't take a magic shield as he doesn't have the option for the mundane equivalent.<br /> <br /> At least that's one way to read it.  And, based on its immediate proximity to the statement about sorcerers and magic armor & shields, it seems to me that it might be the intent.<br /> <br /> The counter argument is the one you've offered- that the language is broad, and might be intended to be all-inclusive, despite <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> having left out the word "all".  Of course, that might have been left out just to prevent people from trying to take magic shields with their daemon princes.  <br /> <br /> I'm really not sure which is the right interpretation.  A lot of folks hold to the maxim that in such a situation, it's best to err on the side of the less powerful interpretation, to avoid the possibility of taking an unintended advantage.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470814.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/470814.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Dec 2008 23:09:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You make a good point Mannahin, and that is that according to the MoC definitions, if one argues that a Chaos sorceror can take a magic shield, one must also argue that a Daemon Prince can take one as well!<br /> <br /> But people seem to be missing my point and that is that Chaos sorcerors (and Daemon Princes) may USE a magic shield. That is what the rule says. However, I agreed with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(526);'>NM</span> that they have no option to TAKE a shield.<br /> <br /> And I agree with the maxim of erring on the side of caution for oneself but also usually allow maximum leniency with others. So, my <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> sorcs do not carry shields, but I would not object to playing an opponent who did.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/471746.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/471746.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:40:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ That seems like a fair compromise on this issue. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/471813.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/471813.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:37:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Um, isn't the Daemon Prince with a shield argument made moot by the fact that the Daemon Prince doesn't have the option to magic tiems <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(482);'>AT</span> ALL? Correct me if I'm worng, but he doesn't actually have a magic item allowance, only an allowance for gifts, yes?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/473495.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/473495.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:14:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ BorderCountess]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Manfred von Drakken wrote:</cite>Um, isn't the Daemon Prince with a shield argument made moot by the fact that the Daemon Prince doesn't have the option to magic tiems <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(482);'>AT</span> ALL? Correct me if I'm worng, but he doesn't actually have a magic item allowance, only an allowance for gifts, yes?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> That is correct. So the Daemon Prince comparison is not a very good one. <br /> <br /> Here is something else we are not focusing on in the text on page 106 of the army book. After stating the line about how Chaos Sorcerers "wear chaos armour and use magic shields or magic armor" we see this:<br /> <br /> "This can make them (sorcerers) formidable close combat opponents as well as masters of the Magic phase - a combination that is rare indeed in the armies of lesser mortals." <br /> <br /> This statement tells us that sorcerers/wizards carrying magical armor and/or shields is "rare" in lesser mortal armies. This infers that is somewhat common in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> armies. <br /> <br /> So if the intent is that sorcerers using magical armor and shields is to be more common in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> armies and sorcerers in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> armies are meant to be more "formidable" at close combat because of this special access to equipment why would <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> restrict sorcerers from taking shields (thus negating the entire statement/idea)? <br /> <br /> The intent is for sorcerers to be better than other wizards in close combat BECAUSE of their access to normally off-limit pieces of equipment. <br /> <br /> NOTE: a response of "chaos sorcerers are better than other wizards in close combats because of their stat lines" is irrelevant to the text in the book and the subject at hand. The book doesn't say that Chaos Sorcerers are more formidable because they are stronger or trained in combat. It cites the equipment as the advantage. <br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/474060.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/474060.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:12:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MascisMan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ MascisMan, Nothing in the rules gives you permission to violate the rule set forth in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span>. In the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(138);'>VC</span> book it explicity states that you cane give them shields and armor even though they normally cannot have it. This language is missing from the Chaos book and is present in every case where you can do this. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/474471.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/474471.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:50:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Negativemoney wrote:</cite>MascisMan, Nothing in the rules gives you permission to violate the rule set forth in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span>. In the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(138);'>VC</span> book it explicity states that you cane give them shields and armor even though they normally cannot have it. This language is missing from the Chaos book and is present in every case where you can do this. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> So, "wear chaos armour and use magic shields or magic armor" is not explicitly saying Sorcerers can wear magic armor and magic shields? <br /> <br /> Listen, I'm not saying anyone is right and wrong. But to state that the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(385);'>WoC</span> book doesn't explicitly state that Sorcerers wear/use shields is wrong <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(72);'>IMO</span>. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/475338.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/475338.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:39:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MascisMan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It does not say they can violate the rules set forth in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span> regarding the 'purchase' not the 'use' of magic Armor and Shields. If they have the option to Purchase then they have the option to use. It does not work the other way around. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476049.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476049.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:41:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Wearing and being able to select are too different things. As you pointed out a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DP</span> has no option to take magic items, but he is classified as a sorceror and thus can use magic armor and shields. Unfortunately, he has no option to take any, so it is largely a useless ability. Chaos Sorcs have an option to take armor (chaos armor), but not shields. So they are more formidable than most wizards (who can't take armor or shields). However, although they can use magic shields, they have no option to take them.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476052.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476052.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:44:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Bingo jmurph!!!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476057.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476057.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:47:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Negativemoney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>jmurph wrote:</cite>Wearing and being able to select are too different things. As you pointed out a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DP</span> has no option to take magic items, but he is classified as a sorceror and thus can use magic armor and shields. Unfortunately, he has no option to take any, so it is largely a useless ability. Chaos Sorcs have an option to take armor (chaos armor), but not shields. So they are more formidable than most wizards (who can't take armor or shields). However, although they can use magic shields, they have no option to take them.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> <br /> Then the fluff is dumb because a chimpanzee can "use" a shield.......]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476535.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/476535.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:54:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MascisMan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Chaos Sorcerers and Shields</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yes, it is dumb. It also is inconsistent with models like the Champion of Tzeentch on Disc who has a shield. But that's how they wrote it. slowed. Much like the Eye of the Gods mandatory challenge rule.<br /> <br /> Essentially, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> thinks if you want to play Chaos and are not playing daemons, you need to be punished.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/479463.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/223593/479463.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:40:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jmurph]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>