<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Rank Bonuses"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/93.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Rank Bonuses"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Rank Bonuses</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In the 8th ed rumor thread one of the major complaints I saw was that the 3+ cap on rank bonuses really hurt horde armies so I thought to myself why can't there be a flexible cap for each army. <br /> <br /> For example Empire and Brets being the basic have a 3+ cap as standard. Chaos, DOC and Elves cap at 2+ Skaven and O&G cap at 4+. (I haven't read beastman or OK yet, so not sure with their big boys, err beasts)<br /> <br /> Now to further this along and increase the need and staying power of Core a +1 to cap for all core units, and a -1 to cap for all mounted units.<br /> <br /> What are others thoughts?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1365247.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1365247.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:07:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Acardia]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Rank Bonuses</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think the problem with any army specific caps is that it's tough for the core rulebook to create rules specific to a given army.  The issue being, once it comes time to update that army book, you either have to keep what you've written in the core book or contradict it.<br /> <br /> The core and mounted options are interesting.  I don't think the mounted one has any realistic affect though.  I don't think I've ever seen a cav unit with a full 3 rank bonus.  Just too expensive.<br /> <br /> Core option might have legs though...<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(314);'>RZ</span>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1365554.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1365554.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:53:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Red_Zeke]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Rank Bonuses</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Red_Zeke wrote:</cite>I think the problem with any army specific caps is that it's tough for the core rulebook to create rules specific to a given army.  The issue being, once it comes time to update that army book, you either have to keep what you've written in the core book or contradict it.<br /> <br /> The core and mounted options are interesting.  I don't think the mounted one has any realistic affect though.  I don't think I've ever seen a cav unit with a full 3 rank bonus.  Just too expensive.<br /> <br /> Core option might have legs though...<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(314);'>RZ</span></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I've seen it one time with 3 and that was goblin wolf riders, before my <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(424);'>RBT</span> shot at them. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1366849.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1366849.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:34:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Acardia]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Rank Bonuses</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree with this idea, but the cap was necessary in  this ed. because horde armies would dominate otherwise, they could just have units of 40-50 Clanrats/Goblins, arranged 5x8/10, and have a 10+ SCR]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1397254.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1397254.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:43:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Karon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Rank Bonuses</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ We ran a playtest once where your maximum rank bonus was equal to your frontage -2. <br /> <br /> So with a frontage of 5 your max. rank bonus would be +3.<br /> <br /> If your frontage was 8 models you could claim a rank bonus of up to +6.<br /> <br /> This way you are accepting a penalty (greater chance of multiple charges, less maneauverable etc.) for the increased rank bonus. <br /> <br /> It also means you don't end up with odd looking 'long units' with a frontage of 5 men with 40 blokes standing behind them in a line.<br /> <br /> It worked reasonably well <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(325);'>tbh</span> and certainly encourage larger units - which I always prefer. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1397998.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1397998.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:48:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ BoShek]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Rank Bonuses</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Sounds like a good idea there Boshek. Gives my 6x6 big un block more of a KAPOW]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1405781.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/281230/1405781.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:21:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ginger_nid_dude]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>