<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "What size base should a 40K daemon chariot use?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/8.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "What size base should a 40K daemon chariot use?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>What size base should a 40K daemon chariot use?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I really don't want to use rectangular bases in my (<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span>) daemon army, so I'm trying decided what I should base my chariot conversions on. <br /> <br /> The most likely options seem to be:<br /> <br /> a round 60mm (i.e., dreadnought size) base (rather small, compared to the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(147);'>WHFB</span> chariot base)<br /> <br /> a Trygon base (quite big -- bigger in surface area than 2 dreadnought bases lined up next to each other -- almost too big to be playable)<br /> <br /> a converted option, using a 60mm base sawed in half, stretched/elongated to oval form.<br /> <br /> The issues would be appearance and (more important) fairness: as these creatures will be deepstriking in, they need to be big enough to create a fair mishap hazard.<br /> <br /> What would be fair?  Which option will be most acceptable, both for friendly games and in tournaments?<br /> <br /> Here's a pic, lining up a pair of 60mm bases and the trygon base:<br /> <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/gallery/88497-base%20size%20comparison.html" target="_new" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://images.dakkadakka.com/gallery/2010/3/7/88497_sm-base%20size%20comparison.jpg" border="0" /></a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/282947/1391164.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/282947/1391164.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:47:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tinfoil]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:What size base should a 40K daemon chariot use?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ For what it's worth, I would be fine with both options.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/282947/1391602.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/282947/1391602.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:50:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nivoglibina]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What size base should a 40K daemon chariot use?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Here's a fourth option that i suggest you add to your poll. 'Lozenge Style WFB Chariot Base'.<br /> I'd use a chariot base from wfb and give it the lozenge treatment with 60mm base ends.<br /> Seems the most fair to me.<br /> If you don't want any straight edge at all i'd go for the stretched 60mm bases.<br /> Trygon seems way too large and the 60mm is just plain cheating! <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/282947/1392527.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/282947/1392527.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:39:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Alex Kolodotschko]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>