<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Against regular marines, regular attacks have no change to even penetrate the armor, they would need to use their crack grenades, which would be each marine getting a single attack and needing 6's and 6's to get a glance. It would take 2-3 glances minimum before the sentinel would go down.

Add in a vindi assassin to put paid to any troublesome powerfists and you have a stronger mix even. A troublesome squad is causing you shooting issues, run a sentinel into them, and you can tie them up for a good part of a game.

With the number of assault armies nowadays, it could come in handy to have something that could cause them some trouble and potentially stomp a few into the ground (and force a break test and run them down)

Viable?]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498376.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498376.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498386.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498386.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? IG codex on me but can these ones scout?

Either way I think this is a good idea, its what I do with my defiler half the time, except that my defiler will probably kill more stuff. I've used the walker to my benifit, both in keeping a unit in CC long enough to widdle it down meanwhile blocking LOS to anything behind it. I've also seen 1-2 sentinels trap a unit of Dire Avengers for a couple of rounds.

I wouldn't rely on this tactic but I definately think its something to keep in mind as far as an in game tactic to capitalize on if the situation arises.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498579.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498579.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Nurglitch wrote:The only problem I see is that while the Space Marines are locked in combat with an Armoured Sentinel you can't shoot them, and Combat Tactics was pretty much designed to prevent them from being tar-pitted by Walkers like that.


The thing is that they actually have to lose the combat to get away with combat tactics. Two str 5 WS3 attacks isn't likely to actually kill any marines.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498598.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498598.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
No, Armoured Sentinels do not have Scout.

willydstyle:

It's not likely, but it's not that unlikely (0.33 expected casualties in the round that the Sentinel charges), protects the Space Marines, and locks the Sentinel down for something like a Space Marine Dreadnought to come in and annihilate the Sentinel.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498646.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498646.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Am I saying it will work every time? No, of course not, but it's not a tactic you should discount if you need to use it.

Whether or not it's something that you should purchase an armored sentinel specifically for is more doubtful, however.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498787.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498787.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
willydstyle wrote:The dreadnought has to be able to make base to base. Not real likely if 10 marines are surrounding it.

Am I saying it will work every time? No, of course not, but it's not a tactic you should discount if you need to use it.

Whether or not it's something that you should purchase an armored sentinel specifically for is more doubtful, however.


that's the problem for me. the odds i'd have either version of Sentinel in a list is so remote.....
that said, if i did happen to have one, it would be a tactic on my list of things to do if need arose.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498823.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1498823.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? CC against most units. I've had them stall Berserkers for 3 game turns before. Yes I would rather have been shooting their guns. This did help keep them out of my lines though.

Unless you can get more mileage out of Armored Sentinels than tarpits for assault units I don't think they are worth the addition. If you can use them to fill a role in your list then their CC resiliency against anything less than s6 is just a bonus.

Cheers,
~Volkan]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499305.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499305.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
But then I play GK.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499382.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499382.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
just 2 weeks ago Stern was stuck in CC with 2 of them for 4 TURNS. hammerhand went off every time, alway rolled 1s and 2s to damage them ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499401.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499401.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499406.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499406.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499408.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499408.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
ductvader wrote:Stern alone?


yes, don't ask what happened to the termies.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499419.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499419.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Grey Templar wrote:
ductvader wrote:Stern alone?


yes, don't ask what happened to the termies.


Oh noes...just bad rolling I assume then...4 S8 attacks a turn should wreak some sentinel havoc.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499440.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499440.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
did i mention demolisher cannons hurt?]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499445.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499445.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Grey Templar wrote:yeah, bad rolling.

did i mention demolisher cannons hurt?


I usually find it's the Plasmacutioners.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499449.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1499449.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
I run a barebones squad of 3 Armored Sentinels in my 1850 list with multilasers and simply move them towards a unit that I'd like tied up for a while. Those multilasers can pour out a lot of shots on the way, too, so they're useful even when the opponent avoids them and getting into charge range.

I remember this one game against orks where a squadron of 3 tied up a squad of Stormboyz and Bikers (Regulars, not nobs) and by the time the sentinels were dead from the 2 powerclaws most of the orks were as well, mostly from 2 of the sentinels exploding while in b2b. ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500001.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500001.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500027.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500027.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500270.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500270.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
A: Slow Orks
]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500466.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500466.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
The problem is that Vendettas are superior.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500542.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500542.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
The problem isn't that sentinels are bad. They are actually quite good.

The problem is that Vendettas are superior.

Ya and if you give them plasama cannons the executioner gets 2 more shots for the same price. So the only real use I see is if you have your heavy support slots filled up with something other than an executioner and you still want 3 plasma shots]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500748.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500748.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? of vehicles...

I didnt beleive him

can someone disprove his theory]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500941.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1500941.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? WS value. Against a walker, CC attacks always strike the front armor, even if it assaulted from behind.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501070.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501070.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501562.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501562.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Tacobake wrote:Honestly I don't know why anyone would put Plasmacannons on their Russ when they can have a good ol' fashioned Battle Cannon. Only good Russ variant is the Vanquisher.


5 str 7 ap 2 small blast templates is nothing to sneeze at.
]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501599.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501599.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Only good Russ variant is the Vanquisher.

Oh I love my Pask Vanquisher, but I am certainly having an affair with two executioner sisters]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501648.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501648.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Unless you're a Land Raider, or another Leman Russ, or a Battlewagon, or a Monolith, or in a bunker. ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501652.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501652.page GMT Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units?
Tacobake wrote:Honestly I don't know why anyone would put Plasmacannons on their Russ when they can have a good ol' fashioned Battle Cannon. Only good Russ variant is the Vanquisher.


the answer is, no "Gets Hot"

its mobile

and it requires more then a pebble to take it down.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501667.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501667.page GMT Re:Viability of Armored Sentinels as delaying tying up enemy units? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501694.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/290094/1501694.page GMT