<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/54.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hey guys,<br /> <br /> I was just reading a thread that essentially got necro'd... but rather than it being some random just writing "I agree", a few people had actually added decent points (and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(72);'>imo</span> just enhanced the discussion). Why are necro'd threads indiscriminately blasted on sight? Surely it's much easier to post on an existing thread than just make a new one (and thus lose aforementioned points)?<br /> <br /> Not saying necro'ing is never bad, however...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634056.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634056.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:30:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Henners91]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Henners91 wrote:</cite>Why are necro'd threads indiscriminately blasted on sight? ..</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> They're not.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634060.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634060.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:32:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ reds8n]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ For me it depends on how long it has been since the last posting, if anything constructive can/has been added, and if the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(280);'>OP</span> has restarted it (this is a key point in the Painting forums).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634129.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634129.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:02:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Waaagh_Gonads]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ For instance, P&M blogs. I don't think the mods generally close P&M blogs, am I correct?<br /> <br /> I sure hope not when I update my Eldar thread after a year and a half <img src="/s/i/a/c944477abc92c1c101da485e07ff06d8.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634223.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634223.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:44:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grignard]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Grignard wrote:</cite>For instance, P&M blogs. I don't think the mods generally close P&M blogs, am I correct?<br /> </div></blockquote><br /> Yes.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634234.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1634234.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:51:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ reds8n]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ NECRONS!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636742.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636742.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 Jun 2010 02:28:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grambo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Oh MAN am I gunna enjoy this when this thread is over a year old *rubs hands together in an evil fashion*]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636804.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636804.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 Jun 2010 03:00:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ KingCracker]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think the question is usually: "would closing this thread and starting a new one that links to it be more or less confusing than suddenly having a fairly active, but old, thread appear on the front page."<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636808.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636808.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 Jun 2010 03:04:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Polonius]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I support Thread Necroing only if the post necroing it includes "<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(484);'>IT</span>'S ALIVE!" in it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636817.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1636817.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 Jun 2010 03:07:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Slarg232]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/284687.page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/284687.page</a><br /> <br /> That was the thread that prompted me to make this one, I don't understand why it was closed.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1638042.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1638042.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:18:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Henners91]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Henners, hats off to you mate, you always manage to make the most disinteresting topic into a multi page epic.<br /> <br />  Are you the type of guy that writes letters of complaint to TV channels instead of just TURNING <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(484);'>IT</span> OVER?!!? <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1638048.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1638048.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:22:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mattyrm]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nope, though I did lately complain about my University's Chaplaincy aaaaand to University security about a damn coke machine eating my moneys...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1638131.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1638131.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:59:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Henners91]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Is there some guide in the forum rules ( I haven't read them in a while ) as to how long you have to continue a thread? For instance, lets say I have a thread in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(415);'>OT</span>  called " I like apples". I either said what I came to say or forgot about it for say six months, then I find out some interesting fact about apples I want to share. Is it necrothreading if I post in that old thread?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1642149.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1642149.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 6 Jun 2010 23:28:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grignard]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If it was a short thread without a ton of replies, probably not.<br /> <br /> The problem is that usually when a person raises a thread, it's into multiple pages, and so a lot of readers are shocked that a massive thread appeared while they were away.  It can also make people read through pages and pages of posts to reach your new facts.<br /> <br /> What's just better for everybody is to post a thread like "I still like apples", like to the old thread, and then post your new stuff.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1642526.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1642526.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 7 Jun 2010 01:59:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Polonius]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Surely thread necro'ing should be acceptable at times?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ As in this thread..<br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/293332.page#1551201" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/293332.page#1551201</a><br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>George Spiggott wrote:</cite>Why is it bad? I'll tell you next year.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Also its to bad you didn't just necro that old thread..]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1644432.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/298426/1644432.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:41:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Shaman]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>