<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Deamon Bases"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/7.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Deamon Bases"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Deamon Bases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Does anyone know of a company doing rond <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> scale bases you can put square warhammer figure bases in?<br /> <br /> Then you could use the same figure, just with optional bases!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1803742.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1803742.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:26:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Druidic]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Deamon Bases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I dunno if this is necessary, I just base my Daemons on the square bases and use them for both game systems. Haven't had any complaints yet.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1803775.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1803775.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:35:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ P4NC4K3]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Deamon Bases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Wife does the same, but being pedantic, warhammer uses square, abd <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> uses different round bases, it will (slightly) change the number of figures in contact, gaps you can fit them in, etc.<br /> <br /> Ok I'd agree its picky, but people can be very picky! :-)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1803955.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1803955.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:29:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Druidic]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Deamon Bases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I put the model on the smallest base of the type. and use magnets to attach to the other. <br /> <br /> Chariots use chariot bases however. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1804614.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1804614.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:01:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Acardia]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Deamon Bases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Druidic wrote:</cite>Wife does the same, but being pedantic, warhammer uses square, abd <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> uses different round bases, it will (slightly) change the number of figures in contact, gaps you can fit them in, etc.<br /> <br /> Ok I'd agree its picky, but people can be very picky! :-)</div></blockquote><br /> This is not quite accurate.  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> uses whatever base the models come with.  As Daemons come with both, it's not incorrect to use square bases on Daemons, even if they are intended (primarily or entirely) for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span>.  Most people collecting entirely for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> would choose round bases on the basis that that's what most <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> models use, but there's no mistake in using square bases.  Unfortunately, there are actually some distinct advantages - most notably in terms of deep-strike packing, where square bases can (numbers depending) result in a more efficient footprint, despite each round base being strictly smaller than a square base.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1804928.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1804928.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:40:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Aelyn]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Deamon Bases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Actually there is a perfect solution.  Go to Gale Force 9 website and look at their movement trays.  They have movement trays that round bases fit into so that is the easy answer hehe.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1805334.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1805334.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 Aug 2010 01:23:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Fishboy]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Deamon Bases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Fishboy wrote:</cite>Actually there is a perfect solution.  Go to Gale Force 9 website and look at their movement trays.  They have movement trays that round bases fit into so that is the easy answer hehe.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> That's your best bet. it'll make everyone happy.<br /> You'll get models you can play with in both games, 40Kers won't stroke out over square bases, and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(147);'>WHFB</span> players won't stroke out that your units are lined up weird.<br /> <br /> It's the most common solution I've seen.<br /> <br /> --Not that you HAVE to buy the GF9 stuff. You COULD make your own.<br /> <br /> Eric]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1814099.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/309185/1814099.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 6 Aug 2010 22:14:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MagickalMemories]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>