<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Future Daemon Codex"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Future Daemon Codex"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Future Daemon Codex</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I just wanted to throw this topic out there and see what everyone's feeling was. Do you think there will be another edition of Codex Chaos Daemons? or Do you think <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> will just paste it back into the next version of codex <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span>, (since there will be another edition of that without doubt.). ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2759985.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2759985.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 May 2011 18:12:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Chamleoneyes]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Future Daemon Codex</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It will likely remain seperate, although Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> could get Summoned deamons replaced by appropriate deamons from the Deamon Codex.<br /> <br /> <br /> Summoned lesser Deamons will be either Bloodletters, Deamonettes, Plaguebearers, and Horrors. with special rules to go with each.<br /> <br /> Greater Deamons would be either a Bloodthirster, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>GUO</span>, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(234);'>KoS</span>, or a lord of change.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2760032.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2760032.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 May 2011 18:20:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Grey Templar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Future Daemon Codex</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think they'd almost certainly remain separate (weather I think they should or not is another matter), as they have a dedicated (if small) fanbase and range of models and we all know that dropping a Codex - no matter how small - isn't a popular move.<br /> <br /> I don't think simply C&P'ing the entries from Daemons into <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span>'s would work either, as I found making my fandex. The Daemons are balanced in that they have to whether a turn of shooting and can be disrupted by deep-strike prevention and poor reserve rolling.<br /> If it was copied into the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> summoning method, their main balancing method (weather a turn of fire) would be lost, meaning that your 10-man squad of power weapon wielding nutters can easily make it into close combat without being shot first, which is a seriously (over)powerful ability.<br /> The summoning methods in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> are arguably much more reliable also, so that would be a further balance issue.<br /> <br /> So yeah, I'd say a separate Codex and separate units. If this was a thread to discuss potential changes to the Codex however, that's something I'd read...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2760091.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2760091.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 May 2011 18:32:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Just Dave]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Future Daemon Codex</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I can't imagine <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> making fewer books.  Stranger things have happened, but I seriously doubt it.  I think it will be a LONG time before demons get redone.  There are quite a few models still missing for a codex almost three years old.  They would need a sizable investment just to get all their current models in plastic, newer than 1998, or even exist. much less more units in a new book.  If <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> hasn't done it by now, I don't think it's high on their radar.<br /> <br /> Man of man I wish the next <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> book (also pretty far off <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(72);'>IMO</span>) would get proper summoned daemons again.  But I'm not holding my breath.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal;">Automatically Appended Next Post:</span><br /> But Daemons need some reliable anti tank shooting.  I don't care if it's limited or expensive, they simply don't have any right now.  Nothing but single shot S8 (usually hittings on a 4+) or overpriced single shot S10 hitting on a 4+ just can't keep up in the current environment. <br /> Here's to hoping...<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2760295.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/366470/2760295.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 4 May 2011 19:12:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ArtfcllyFlvrd]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>