<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/8.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I found this on the interwebs .I think it fits better with the army's theme than the dreadknight <br /> <a href="http://hitechminiatures.com/null/product/info/47" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://hitechminiatures.com/null/product/info/47</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906512.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906512.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:03:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ azgrim]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Perhaps.  Personally, I think the best thing that fits the fluff as far as the dreadknight is concerned is ripping that page out of the book. <br /> <br /> But anyway, I've seen some conversions that achieved the same general idea by just enclosing in the area the terminator sits and removing the silly hands and instead making the arms with actual weapons on the end.<br /> <br /> Was never a fan of the whole gundam thing where these massive warmachines would risk tiny, highly sophisticated digits to grasp on to something. I much prefer to battletech idea where the weapons are built right in and can disengaged at base.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906528.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906528.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:06:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nvs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I really don't like the model, it's too non-Imperium style. Easier to just modify a Dreadnought than buy this as I'm not a fan of it either, it just looks too grand and individual. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906543.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906543.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:10:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ iproxtaco]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://i970.photobucket.com/albums/ae190/Saborlas/General%20Thread%20Stuff/1266170660809.jpg" border="0" />]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906559.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906559.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:13:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SoloFalcon1138]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>SoloFalcon1138 wrote:</cite><img src="http://i970.photobucket.com/albums/ae190/Saborlas/General%20Thread%20Stuff/1266170660809.jpg" border="0" /></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Explain? As in, showing this model? Or about the Dreadknight in general, as I've not seen many, if any, of either in this section.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906613.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2906613.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:23:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ iproxtaco]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Nvs wrote:</cite>Perhaps.  Personally, I think the best thing that fits the fluff as far as the dreadknight is concerned is ripping that page out of the book. </div></blockquote><br /> <br />  <img src="/s/i/a/c614b4720f1b7225b0523f616ac30b2f.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2907072.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2907072.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:06:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CT GAMER]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>iproxtaco wrote:</cite><br /> Explain? As in, showing this model? Or about the Dreadknight in general, as I've not seen many, if any, of either in this section.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> This would be only the 100th or so thread about having to use an alternate model for the Dreadknight, as well as complaining about the codex itself.  Just look around, they're not hard to find.<br /> <br /> Plus I find it funny that they supplied a model for a new unit and everyone complains.  When the Stormraven came out, everyone complained, not really about it being over-powered, but about having to make their own.  Only after the model came out did people start complaining again about it being over-powered, and unattractive...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2907108.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2907108.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:13:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SoloFalcon1138]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Take a look at the Dreamforge Games Leviathan Crusader...the current ones are 28mm scale and about 8-9 inches tall. However, the 15mm scale versions are at the caster for quote right now, they are about 5.5 inches tall, which will make them great for dreadknights. <br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/gallery/74723-Azriel%2C%20Crusader%2C%20Dreamforge%2C%20Gabriel%2C%20Leviathan.html" target="_new" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://images.dakkadakka.com/gallery/2010/1/8/74723_sm-Azriel%2C%20Crusader%2C%20Dreamforge%2C%20Gabriel%2C%20Leviathan.jpg" border="0" /></a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2907840.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2907840.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:39:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mad4Minis]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Alternative  GK Dreadknight /Dreadknought model</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>iproxtaco wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>SoloFalcon1138 wrote:</cite><img src="http://i970.photobucket.com/albums/ae190/Saborlas/General%20Thread%20Stuff/1266170660809.jpg" border="0" /></div></blockquote><br /> Explain? As in, showing this model? Or about the Dreadknight in general, as I've not seen many, if any, of either in this section.</div></blockquote><br /> There have been half a dozen threads discovering and discussing your find, as could be expected with a model that was made to be an alternative Dreadknight.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2908028.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/374503/2908028.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:27:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kroothawk]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>