Slipstream wrote:I was on you tube yesterday and looked at the reviews of the finecast stuff and was left slightly baffled by the reviewers' comments. If you happen to be the ones that I'm going to mention I'd like to hear yourt responses. First up was an SM Chaplain. This model had really bad cast lines, parts of the model were obscured by obvious mould damage and air bubbles. Yet the reviewer went on to say it was a good model. Another had an SM vanguard set, he listed the pros and cons and lo and behold the cons outweighed the pro points; most notable was a power sword which he was able to bend the point down the hilt. He also said he was impressed by the quality and that GW were doing the right thing.
I need to get this straight. GW is selling a product that has supposedly more 'detail' but an overall poor product quality and is charging more? For example the Chaplain model in its metal form would be near enough perfect quality with only a mould line and minor issues and yet the resin one has many faults but because it has better detail we can overlook the downside? Surely not?