<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented."]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/54.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented."]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet, but I figured I'd post it.<br /> <a href="http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Possible_Attack_On_Fort_Hood_Thwarted_126321658.html#.TjGbiwLuzNs.facebook" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Possible_Attack_On_Fort_Hood_Thwarted_126321658.html#.TjGbiwLuzNs.facebook</a><br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>FORT HOOD (July 28, 2011)—A tip from a Killeen gun dealer led to the arrest of an AWOL Muslim soldier who had firearms and bomb-making components in his hotel room and planned an attack on Fort Hood personnel, authorities confirmed Thursday.<br /> <br /> Killeen police arrested Army Pvt. Naser Jason Abdo, 21, who was AWOL from Fort Campbell, Ky., Wednesday at America's Best Value Inn on South Fort Hood Street in Killeen on an outstanding child pornography warrant.<br /> <br /> The arrest came after an investigation that started with a tip from a local gun shop on Tuesday.<br /> <br /> Abdo was assigned to the 101st Airborne Division’s Company E, 1st Brigade Combat Team (Rear Provisional) at the time of his arrest.<br /> <br /> U.S. Rep. John Carter. R-Round Rock, who’s been briefed on the arrest, told News 10 Thursday afternoon that the soldier planned to detonate two bombs at an unnamed restaurant near the post that Fort Hood personnel frequent and then planned to open fire on the diners.<br /> <br /> “He was planning on going into a restaurant someplace that was heavily traveled by soldiers, set off the two bombs then come back in and finish everybody off with his gun,” Carter said.<br /> <br /> Carter said Abdo had broken into an adjoining hotel room and was in the process of "cooking" the bombs at the time of his arrest.<br /> <br /> During a news conference Thursday afternoon, Killeen Police Chief Dennis Baldwin confirmed that “military personnel were the target of this suspect,” but declined to provide further details.<br /> <br /> Abdo was held in an isolation cell in the Killeen City Jail Thursday afternoon.<br /> <br /> FBI spokesman Erik Vasys said Thursday that firearms and "items that could be identified as bomb-making components, including gunpowder" were removed from his hotel room.<br /> <br /> CNN reported that authorities also recovered pressure cookers, 18 pounds of sugar that could have been used to enhance an explosive, Christmas lights that could have been used as a timer for a bomb, and Jihadist literature.<br /> <br /> Sources told CNN enough material was recovered to have made two bombs.<br /> <br /> An alert issued by the Army said Abdo admitted he planned an attack on Fort Hood.<br /> <br /> The Associated Press obtained the e-mail alert that was sent to all Army units Thursday.<br /> <br /> It said Abdo had a large quantity of ammunition, weapons and a bomb inside a backpack.<br /> <br /> It said he admitted under questioning that he planned an attack on Fort Hood.<br /> <br /> Unconfirmed reports suggested that two other soldiers have also been arrested, but Baldwin said Thursday, "As far as we know, he did act alone."<br /> <br /> Authorities at Fort Campbell interrogated two of Abdo’s friends, Carter said, but there was no evidence either was involved.<br /> <br /> “Thanks to quick action by a Texas gun dealer in alerting local police to a suspicious character and vigorous response by the Killeen Police Department, we may well have averted a repeat of the tragic 2009 radical Islamic attack on our nation’s largest military installation,” Carter said.<br /> <br /> Carter’s office said it received information that Guns Galore in Killeen, which is the same store at which accused Fort Hood gunman Maj. Nidal Hasan purchased weapons used in the November 2009 attack at the post’s Soldier Readiness Center, called Killeen police to report that a man had purchased gunpowder, shotgun ammunition and a magazine for a semi-automatic handgun.<br /> <br /> Carter’s office said the man also purchased uniforms with Fort Hood unit patches from a local surplus store.<br /> <br /> “On questioning, the suspect reportedly admitted planning an attack on Fort Hood,” Carter said.<br /> <br /> Abdo, who’s from Garland, joined the Army in March 2009.<br /> <br /> He went AWOL on July 4, on the eve of his first deployment to Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> Greg Ebert of the gun shop Guns Galore said the man authorities identified as Abdo asked about smokeless gunpowder, what it could be used for and how it worked Tuesday.<br /> <br /> Ebert said the man purchased six 1-pound canisters of the smokeless powder, three boxes of .12 gauge shotgun shells and a handgun magazine.<br /> <br /> He paid in cash and left in a hurry, leaving his change behind. Ebert said.<br /> <br /> Ebert, who retired from the Killeen Police Department last year after 17 years on the force, said the purchase came to about $250.<br /> <br /> Police reviewed surveillance video from the store, which showed the man arrived and departed in a cab.<br /> <br /> Fort Hood Thursday acknowledged the arrest, but referred questions to the Killeen Police Department.<br /> <br /> “At this time, there has been no incident at Fort Hood,” the statement said.<br /> <br /> “We continue our diligence in keeping our force protection at appropriate levels,” the post said.<br /> <br /> U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, praised authorities for their handling of the situation.<br /> <br /> “Yesterday’s incident is yet another reminder that we must stay vigilant against those who wish to attack innocent Americans,” he said.<br /> <br /> Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, praised residents and police for their vigilance.<br /> <br /> “His arrest is a perfect example of how alert citizens and dedicated law enforcement personnel can work together to prevent a potential terrorist attack in our own backyard,” she said.<br /> <br /> Texas Gov. Rick Perry called the arrest “a sobering reminder of the importance of remaining vigilant in the ongoing efforts to protect our communities from those that would do us harm.”<br /> <br /> “Quick and diligent efforts like these save lives, and we are reminded to be thankful for our peace officers, and their continued dedication to keeping our communities and families safe,” Perry said.<br /> <br /> “This incident also underscores the importance of citizens reporting something that doesn’t seem quite right immediately to law enforcement,” he said.<br /> <br /> Abdo was the subject of an Al-Jazeera report in August 2010 in which he told an interviewer he didn’t think he could “take part in any way in the killing of a Muslim.<br /> <br /> According to the website CouragetoResist.com, Abdo sought conscientious objector status in June 2010.<br /> <br /> An article on the website says Abdo “experienced a great deal of harassment and discrimination” because of his beliefs.<br /> <br /> "Early in basic training… one soldier repeatedly insulted me and Islam saying, 'Go pray to your god that doesn't exist or your pedophile prophet,'” the article quoted Abdo as saying.<br /> <br /> “The climax of this harassment occurred when my comrades all made a concerted effort to get me an unwanted discharge because I was not welcome in their ranks,” Abdo said.<br /> <br /> Army spokesman Troy Roland said Thursday the application for conscientious objector status was approved and that Abdo was about to be discharged when the child pornography allegations surfaced.<br /> <br /> After a hearing on June 15, Roland said, an investigating officer recommended that Abdo be referred for court-martial.<br /> <br /> Abdo has said he thought he was charged with a crime because he sought to leave the Army as a conscientious objector.<br /> <br /> A website was created to raise funds for his defense, but it appeared to have been taken down Thursday morning.<br /> <br /> Free Nasser Abdo Website<br /> <br /> Read The Article<br /> <br /> James Branum, the lawyer who represents Abdo in both his conscientious objector application and the child pornography case, posted a statement on his Facebook page Thursday.<br /> <br /> “I represented him on two prior cases (his C.O. claim and the charges against him for possession of child pornography, but I am not representing him on the new charges that are being reported in the press and have no comments to make to the press about these new charges,” he said.<br /> <br /> In November 2009, Fort Hood was the scene of the worst mass shooting on a U.S. military installation in history.<br /> <br /> Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan is charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder in the deadly Nov. 5, 2009 rampage.<br /> <br /> He’s scheduled to stand trial next March and will face the death penalty.<br /> <br /> He remains in custody in the Bell County Jail.<br /> <br /> He was left paralyzed in an exchange of gunfire with two Fort Hood police officers.</div></blockquote>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130393.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130393.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:03:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sasori]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>.12 gauge</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Holy god, a shotgun that fires an 8.3 pound payload?! What kind of monster is this man?! ....Oh, they meant a 12 gauge. <br /> <br /> Good job on the dealer though. The stories I have heard from dealers about the people who come in ....scary, and hilarious. <br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Abdo sought conscientious objector status in June 2010. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Applies for CO, but then goes on to do this. Right. I hope the UCMJ has plenty of books to throw at this turd. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130738.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130738.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:27:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SOFDC]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Sounds like they might want to consider having personnel carry sidearms at all times on and off post...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130814.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130814.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:58:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ chaos0xomega]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Child porn and a terrorist?  What kind of amalgamation of awful is that?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130832.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130832.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 06:09:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ahtman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ From what I understand, its actually pretty common (at least for the insurgents in Afghanistan, though it could also be the result of an effective PsyOp campaign...)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130834.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130834.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 06:10:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ chaos0xomega]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Wait...he was reported for buying gunpowder, a pistol mag and some shotgun shells, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(334);'>wtf</span>? While 6pnds is expensive, it's not out of the ordinary for someone who reloads, I've known people to buy 25pnds at a time if there was a sale going on. <br /> <br /> I think this has more to do with the clerk figuring out this dude was suspect though more I reread it, the change thing and then bolting out the door. And I imagine plenty of other signs he wasn't right in the head, good on that gun store dude though, being labeled as the place that Hasan bought his guns at can't be a comfortable thought so I'm sure he's playing it safe, glad he did and reported this. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130851.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130851.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 06:18:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sckitzo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>I think this has more to do with the clerk figuring out this dude was suspect though more I reread it, the change thing and then bolting out the door. And I imagine plenty of other signs he wasn't right in the head, good on that gun store dude though</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Aye. People walking into gunshops and buying quantities of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>raw</span> powder is not going to be unusual. However, someone buying <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(111);'>raw</span> powder and asking questions with the apparent aim of getting inventive -will- be unusual, especially if this place unintentionally supplied one terrorist already. <br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Sounds like they might want to consider having personnel carry sidearms at all times on and off post...</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> It's Texas. Last I heard hey can go and march their happy little butt down to the local <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DPS</span> office and begin the process for a concealed handgun license like any other joe blow unless the base commanders orders run contrary to that. Off-base carry after that point should be a non-issue.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130931.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3130931.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:01:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SOFDC]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm glad this attack was thwarted. I do want our side to win and end this war. But the amount of moral outrage presented towards the end of the piece is a bit <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(276);'>OTT</span>.<br /> <br /> Soldiers are legitimate targets and we hit theirs all the time while they are sleeping, praying, eating etc.<br /> <br /> How is this any different?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136071.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136071.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:16:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ feeder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You want to know if there is a difference between a religiously motivated terrorist traitor child porn advocate and your own allied professional soldiers?  I suppose if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, use a broad moral relativism, and only ask if they both blow things up then you could say they are the same thing.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136155.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136155.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:43:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ahtman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>SOFDC wrote:</cite>It's Texas. Last I heard hey can go and march their happy little butt down to the local <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DPS</span> office and begin the process for a concealed handgun license like any other joe blow unless the base commanders orders run contrary to that. Off-base carry after that point should be a non-issue.</div></blockquote>Correct.  Though Texas handgun laws are a total pain in the ass.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136201.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136201.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:00:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Melissia]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>chaos0xomega wrote:</cite>From what I understand, its actually pretty common (at least for the insurgents in Afghanistan, though it could also be the result of an effective PsyOp campaign...)</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Really? Is there a study or report on this you can link? ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136296.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3136296.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:28:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ArbeitsSchu]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>Though Texas handgun laws are a total pain in the ass.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> The whole revolver/autoloader endorsement on the actual CHLs themselves was the biggest pain in the butt. Class fees too. -Sigh- I had already amassed the money for both my CHL and my suppressor paperwork when I decided to move to cali. Now I can get neither until I am in sacramento county! The irony! <br /> <br /> Least in Tejas you don't have mandatory handgun registration, a boatload of extra fees, no 10 day waiting period, and discretionary "We don't like your face so no." issue CHLs! <br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>How is this any different?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I'm sorry, I have to use a warhammer quote here, because it just fits so perfectly: A Traitor can never be forgiven. A Traitor will never find peace in this world or the next. There is nothing as wretched or as hated in all the world as a Traitor.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137004.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137004.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:00:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SOFDC]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Don't we have guys like that too though? Guys that infiltrate enemy organisations and bring them down? I'm pretty damn sure we do.<br /> <br /> Not saying that terrorists are the same as soldiers- they are not. But just saying that any argument can cut both ways.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137052.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137052.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:24:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Da Boss]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>SOFDC wrote:</cite><blockquote class="uncited"><div>Sounds like they might want to consider having personnel carry sidearms at all times on and off post...</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> It's Texas. Last I heard hey can go and march their happy little butt down to the local <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DPS</span> office and begin the process for a concealed handgun license like any other joe blow unless the base commanders orders run contrary to that. Off-base carry after that point should be a non-issue.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Wasn't the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(438);'>Ft</span>. Hood CO the one who wanted people who lived off the installation to start registering their firearms? <br /> <br /> And on every installation I've ever been on for anything length of time (these were all Air Force mind you) you could keep your gun in the Armory, and transport to and from your home only. Well, except for the Reserve base, everyone kept on in their car there. But ever since the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(438);'>Ft</span>. Hood shooting, from what I've heard from my buddies in the Army, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(438);'>Ft</span>. Hood has become very gun shy of private weapons. Which is ironic when you think about it in a way, but fact of the matter is, very few people in the military know how to really use a firearm, sure they shoot once a year or so, but only certain jobs got even close to the training they should have, hell I was a cop and I worked with people who were still sorta freaked out by guns... But again, that was <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(702);'>AF</span>, Army maybe be a helluva better. <br /> <br /> Their not going to allow military issue sidearms to be used off base except for in certain situation (transport of guns, bombs  or people are the only ones that come to mind) because of the potential liability, and it does give off a rather negative, Police State image if we were armed off the yard, that's just my opinion though. And I am very much pro gun, I carry most places and almost always had one in the car, but not sure I'd sign off on arming folks to go to lunch. <br /> <br /> <br /> <span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal;">Automatically Appended Next Post:</span><br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Da Boss wrote:</cite>Don't we have guys like that too though? Guys that infiltrate enemy organisations and bring them down? I'm pretty damn sure we do.<br /> <br /> Not saying that terrorists are the same as soldiers- they are not. But just saying that any argument can cut both ways.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Yes, we do, but not by targeting civilian targets (there may have been alot of military there, but not all of them) in order to generate drama and outrage to bring attention to their cause. <br /> <br /> Terrorists hit soft targets like that for a reason, their soft, easy to hit and generate alot of media attention to the cause. There is also, normally, less chance of failure in blowing/shooting up a building  in a city then on a military base]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137161.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137161.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:01:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sckitzo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Da Boss wrote:</cite>Don't we have guys like that too though? Guys that infiltrate enemy organisations and bring them down? I'm pretty damn sure we do.<br /> <br /> Not saying that terrorists are the same as soldiers- they are not. But just saying that any argument can cut both ways.</div></blockquote><br /> This isn't a case of "guys infiltrating enemy organisations". This is a case of "guys within an organisation turning against it in support of them having turned to a new ideology".]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137269.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137269.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:03:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kanluwen]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite>You want to know if there is a difference between a religiously motivated terrorist traitor child porn advocate and your own allied professional soldiers?  I suppose if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, use a broad moral relativism, and only ask if they both blow things up then you could say they are the same thing.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Sorry, I'll clarify. I am questioning the sense of outrage that those interviewed expressed. The attack, had it been successfully carried out, would have been a low-tech version of what our side does every day. I understand feeling relief, elation, triumph. But not outrage or surprise. We're at war, remember?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137272.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137272.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:04:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ feeder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite>You want to know if there is a difference between a religiously motivated terrorist traitor child porn advocate and your own allied professional soldiers?  I suppose if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, use a broad moral relativism, and only ask if they both blow things up then you could say they are the same thing.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Sorry, I'll clarify. I am questioning the sense of outrage that those interviewed expressed. The attack, had it been successfully carried out, would have been a low-tech version of what our side does every day. I understand feeling relief, elation, triumph. But not outrage or surprise. We're at war, remember?</div></blockquote><br /> Yes, you're clearly not getting.<br /> <br /> The "outrage" is because it's not an outside force attacking. It's a traitor, who was serving within the US military and targeting the people who he is supposed to be working and living alongside of.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137285.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137285.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:09:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kanluwen]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite>You want to know if there is a difference between a religiously motivated terrorist traitor child porn advocate and your own allied professional soldiers?  I suppose if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, use a broad moral relativism, and only ask if they both blow things up then you could say they are the same thing.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Sorry, I'll clarify. I am questioning the sense of outrage that those interviewed expressed. The attack, had it been successfully carried out, would have been a low-tech version of what our side does every day. I understand feeling relief, elation, triumph. But not outrage or surprise. We're at war, remember?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> So you don't see a difference between 9/11, the London Bus bombings, the Spanish train bombings, and the military actions by governments to curtail such things?  As long as there is an explosion everything is the same?  Why people use violence doesn't matter at all?  They want the world to kneel before a new caliphate (with them in control of course) and different governments of the world are trying to fight this problem, and not just militarily, and you see them as essentially equivalent somehow?  By your reasoning law enforcement shooting a guy on a murder spree are just as monstrous as the man going around spraying random people with gunfire.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137309.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137309.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:28:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ahtman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited"><div>And on every installation I've ever been on for anything length of time (these were all Air Force mind you) you could keep your gun in the Armory, and transport to and from your home only. Well, except for the Reserve base, everyone kept on in their car there. But ever since the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(438);'>Ft</span>. Hood shooting, from what I've heard from my buddies in the Army, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(438);'>Ft</span>. Hood has become very gun shy of private weapons. Which is ironic when you think about it in a way, but fact of the matter is, very few people in the military know how to really use a firearm, sure they shoot once a year or so, but only certain jobs got even close to the training they should have, hell I was a cop and I worked with people who were still sorta freaked out by guns...<br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> While I come from an army family, I am not military. I never have been, quite likely never will be, so I defer to people who have BTDT, and qualified my statement with: <br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div><b>unless the base commanders orders run contrary to that</b></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137314.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137314.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:32:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SOFDC]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ohh I agree with you SOFDC, was just pointing out no way in hell Hoods CO will authorize it, but yeah have the veto power for this sorta thing really.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137466.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137466.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:05:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sckitzo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Da Boss wrote:</cite>Don't we have guys like that too though? Guys that infiltrate enemy organisations and bring them down? I'm pretty damn sure we do.<br /> <br /> Not saying that terrorists are the same as soldiers- they are not. But just saying that any argument can cut both ways.</div></blockquote><br /> He was neither an infiltrator nor an enemy agent; he was a criminal who snapped when he came under investigation, and decided to preemptively take revenge on the general organization investigating him. Lashing out when cornered is a basic animal instinct, though few people are unstable enough to lash out in such a dramatic and incoherent fashion.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137492.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137492.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:15:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sir Pseudonymous]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Whoops, my apologies- I only skimmed the article.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137493.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137493.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:16:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Da Boss]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Actually, on rereading the article, I see that the charges were brought under dubious circumstances, and that the planned attack was a more personal action against a general group of people he felt persecuted by; more unstable, less incoherent. Still not an enemy agent, though. He should be held in contempt for his lack of self-control rather than vilified, though.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137501.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137501.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:26:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sir Pseudonymous]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite>You want to know if there is a difference between a religiously motivated terrorist traitor child porn advocate and your own allied professional soldiers?  I suppose if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, use a broad moral relativism, and only ask if they both blow things up then you could say they are the same thing.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Sorry, I'll clarify. I am questioning the sense of outrage that those interviewed expressed. The attack, had it been successfully carried out, would have been a low-tech version of what our side does every day. I understand feeling relief, elation, triumph. But not outrage or surprise. We're at war, remember?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> So you don't see a difference between 9/11, the London Bus bombings, the Spanish train bombings, and the military actions by governments to curtail such things?  As long as there is an explosion everything is the same?  Why people use violence doesn't matter at all?  They want the world to kneel before a new caliphate (with them in control of course) and different governments of the world are trying to fight this problem, and not just militarily, and you see them as essentially equivalent somehow?  By your reasoning law enforcement shooting a guy on a murder spree are just as monstrous as the man going around spraying random people with gunfire.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Pretty much, yeah. I do not draw a major distinction between government and popular front. The difference is who won the war. Just because I don't agree with another group's goals doesn't mean I can't empathize with their desire to have their goals met. Of course, your last example is flawed. One man does not equal a popular movement. <br /> <br /> Still, I don't understand. Why so outraged when the other side does essentially the same thing ours does day in day out? Is it because the war is supposed to be in their backyard?They are somehow cheating by bringing the war home?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137734.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137734.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 04:37:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ feeder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite>You want to know if there is a difference between a religiously motivated terrorist traitor child porn advocate and your own allied professional soldiers?  I suppose if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, use a broad moral relativism, and only ask if they both blow things up then you could say they are the same thing.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Sorry, I'll clarify. I am questioning the sense of outrage that those interviewed expressed. The attack, had it been successfully carried out, would have been a low-tech version of what our side does every day. I understand feeling relief, elation, triumph. But not outrage or surprise. We're at war, remember?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> So you don't see a difference between 9/11, the London Bus bombings, the Spanish train bombings, and the military actions by governments to curtail such things?  As long as there is an explosion everything is the same?  Why people use violence doesn't matter at all?  They want the world to kneel before a new caliphate (with them in control of course) and different governments of the world are trying to fight this problem, and not just militarily, and you see them as essentially equivalent somehow?  By your reasoning law enforcement shooting a guy on a murder spree are just as monstrous as the man going around spraying random people with gunfire.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Pretty much, yeah. I do not draw a major distinction between government and popular front. The difference is who won the war. Just because I don't agree with another group's goals doesn't mean I can't empathize with their desire to have their goals met. Of course, your last example is flawed. One man does not equal a popular movement. <br /> <br /> Still, I don't understand. Why so outraged when the other side does essentially the same thing ours does day in day out? Is it because the war is supposed to be in their backyard?They are somehow cheating by bringing the war home?</div></blockquote><br /> By ignoring explanations and focusing on 'outrage', I'm going to now treat you as a troll.<br /> <br /> There is no "cheating". People get 'outraged' when it comes to traitors. There's a reason for that. It's turning your back on everything that you once protected or held dear, and usually for no real reason beyond personal gain.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137766.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137766.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 04:51:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kanluwen]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So you are applying moral and political relativism, as I stated before.  They are only doing the same thing if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, and use a broad moral relativism.<br /> <br /> Understanding another persons perspective doesn't mean you have to agree with them.  I understand why a KKK member doesn't like non-Whites, that doesn't mean we should be ok with that kind of thinking or the actions it promotes.  <br /> <br /> Considering that "popular fronts' are made up of individual actions you can't easily say that when an individual does it doesn't count.  If the guy in the above situation was part of anarcho-primativist group that wanted to wipe out all government then suddenly the police would be just as wrong as him, but if he is just one guy then the police are justified?  That makes no sense at all.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137793.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137793.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:04:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ahtman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite>Pretty much, yeah. I do not draw a major distinction between government and popular front. The difference is who won the war. Just because I don't agree with another group's goals doesn't mean I can't empathize with their desire to have their goals met. Of course, your last example is flawed. One man does not equal a popular movement. <br /> <br /> Still, I don't understand. Why so outraged when the other side does essentially the same thing ours does day in day out? Is it because the war is supposed to be in their backyard?They are somehow cheating by bringing the war home?</div></blockquote><br /> We're not fighting "popular fronts", we're fighting the local equivalent of street gangs, albeit gangsters who happen to have piles of antique weapons we gave them to fight the Soviets with back in the eighties. They're not soldiers fighting for their country, they're idiot kids who were either coerced into joining, or who thought it would make them badasses, same as all gangs. The lone, unhinged individuals who get caught plotting various attacks in the US aren't even in league with anyone we're fighting, they're just gibbering lunatics trying to take out their rage at the world, and are fortunately too stupid to pull it off.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137946.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3137946.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 06:26:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sir Pseudonymous]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite>So you are applying moral and political relativism, as I stated before.  They are only doing the same thing if you remove all context, the ability to differentiate motives, and use a broad moral relativism.<br /> <br /> Understanding another persons perspective doesn't mean you have to agree with them.  I understand why a KKK member doesn't like non-Whites, that doesn't mean we should be ok with that kind of thinking or the actions it promotes.  <br /> <br /> Considering that "popular fronts' are made up of individual actions you can't easily say that when an individual does it doesn't count.  If the guy in the above situation was part of anarcho-primativist group that wanted to wipe out all government then suddenly the police would be just as wrong as him, but if he is just one guy then the police are justified?  That makes no sense at all.<br /> <br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I think I'm not being clear enough with my question. I'm not looking at this as right vs wrong. <br /> <br /> I believe that this man's attempted actions are unquestionably wrong from our side. I don't understand his goals, but I do understand that his side wants to win, just as ours does. Maybe if I sought out and consumed all the propaganda that he did I would understand his goals, but I don't want to.<br /> <br /> I'm using "outrage" to mean "angry surprise". We have been at war with a shadowy, nebulous ideology for about ten years now. We have cruise missile'd weddings, strafed funerals, and bombed homes, schools and hospitals. That's fine, we are at war. Just don't act all outraged when the other side does the same. That's what war is.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3138925.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3138925.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:06:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ feeder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Always nice to keep up on the news.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3138946.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3138946.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:16:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Tacobake]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite>I'm using "outrage" to mean "angry surprise". We have been at war with a shadowy, nebulous ideology for about ten years now. We have cruise missile'd weddings, strafed funerals, and bombed homes, schools and hospitals. That's fine, we are at war. Just don't act all outraged when the other side does the same. That's what war is.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I think there's a false equivalence being drawn here.  Motive does matter.  If one side kills an unarmed civilian bystander by accident, and regards this as a tragedy, that is different from when someone else targets an unarmed civilian bystander deliberately, and boasts about it as an accomplishment.<br /> <br /> War is an awful thing, and I don't think anyone else in the thread is going to agree that it's "fine" that weddings, funerals, or hospitals have been bombed.  Generally these are seen as terrible things, to be avoided if possible in the future.  <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3139467.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3139467.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:36:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Mannahnin wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite>I'm using "outrage" to mean "angry surprise". We have been at war with a shadowy, nebulous ideology for about ten years now. We have cruise missile'd weddings, strafed funerals, and bombed homes, schools and hospitals. That's fine, we are at war. Just don't act all outraged when the other side does the same. That's what war is.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I think there's a false equivalence being drawn here.  Motive does matter.  If one side kills an unarmed civilian bystander by accident, and regards this as a tragedy, that is different from when someone else targets an unarmed civilian bystander deliberately, and boasts about it as an accomplishment.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I don't think the article actually has this guy as any sort of traitor planning an attack on civillians. If anything, he's a crazy that was looking to get back on some people that wronged him. It's clear he acted alone rather than 'defected' to any sort of opposing side.<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>War is an awful thing, and I don't think anyone else in the thread is going to agree that it's "fine" that weddings, funerals, or hospitals have been bombed.  Generally these are seen as terrible things, to be avoided if possible in the future.  <br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> That's very naive coming from you, Mannahnin.<br /> <br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3140625.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3140625.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 02:35:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Emperors Faithful]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite>That's very naive coming from you, Mannahnin.<br /> <br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Are you stating that our respective militarizes (US, Australia, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>, ect) actively seek to cause civilian casualties?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3140827.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3140827.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 04:07:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ahtman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite>That's very naive coming from you, Mannahnin.<br /> <br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Are you stating that our respective militarizes (US, Australia, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>, ect) actively seek to cause civilian casualties?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Yes, yes we do actually have such qualms...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3140981.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3140981.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 05:14:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sckitzo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Sckitzo wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite>That's very naive coming from you, Mannahnin.<br /> <br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Are you stating that our respective militarizes (US, Australia, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>, ect) actively seek to cause civilian casualties?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Yes, yes we do actually have such qualms...</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I need a bit of clarification.  Are you confusing the fact there are civilian casualties with our soldiers going out of their way to cause civilian casualties?  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141002.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141002.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 05:21:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ahtman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite><br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> In my experience the opposite tends to be true.<br /> <br /> The people with no experience with death tend to scoff at its significance.<br /> <br /> But, of course, your millage may vary.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141023.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141023.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 05:28:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dogma]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Sckitzo wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Ahtman wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite>That's very naive coming from you, Mannahnin.<br /> <br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Are you stating that our respective militarizes (US, Australia, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>, ect) actively seek to cause civilian casualties?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Yes, yes we do actually have such qualms...</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I need a bit of clarification.  Are you confusing the fact there are civilian casualties with our soldiers going out of their way to cause civilian casualties?  </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Wait  <img src="/s/i/a/7ae18ba11c7ba79f6898e876a4b8ba4a.gif" border="0"> just typed up a scathing, sarcastic rant then realized you were saying the same thing I was. No man, I was saying we have qualms about killing civilians, and that it's avoided when ever possible. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141361.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141361.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:32:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sckitzo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite><br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>War is an awful thing, and I don't think anyone else in the thread is going to agree that it's "fine" that weddings, funerals, or hospitals have been bombed.  Generally these are seen as terrible things, to be avoided if possible in the future.  <br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> That's very naive coming from you, Mannahnin.<br /> <br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.</div></blockquote><br /> <br />  Yeah Emps astute again there mate, I have done 4 tours, (2 Iraqs, 2 Afgahistan) and I really do not care at all if something that only has a Muslim population gets bombed. I mean, im not a total psycho so <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(269);'>id</span> steer clear of saying its a "good thing" because im aware of them tactical implications and I actually want us to win the war, something you cannot do if you turn everyone against you. <br /> <br />  However on a personal level, I care nothing at all for civilian deaths in either of those nations, I view Islam as the single biggest evil in the entire world, and I think that the less Muslims in it the better. If it wasn't for the ramifications (radicalising even more of them) I would be happy for the strategy to be "bomb them out of the stone age"<br /> <br />  Nasty business im sure, but hey ho. I don't have nightmares, addictions or PTSD so i figure I got off lightly. <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141921.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3141921.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:08:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mattyrm]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ What is the record for number of suspensions/bans, anyway?  I'd be interested to see the league-table.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3142099.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3142099.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:05:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Albatross]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Albatross wrote:</cite>What is the record for number of suspensions/bans, anyway?  I'd be interested to see the league-table.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> What?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3142181.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3142181.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:26:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Sasori]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Mannahnin wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>feeder wrote:</cite>I'm using "outrage" to mean "angry surprise". We have been at war with a shadowy, nebulous ideology for about ten years now. We have cruise missile'd weddings, strafed funerals, and bombed homes, schools and hospitals. That's fine, we are at war. Just don't act all outraged when the other side does the same. That's what war is.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I think there's a false equivalence being drawn here.  Motive does matter.  If one side kills an unarmed civilian bystander by accident, and regards this as a tragedy, that is different from when someone else targets an unarmed civilian bystander deliberately, and boasts about it as an accomplishment.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I don't think the article actually has this guy as any sort of traitor planning an attack on civillians. If anything, he's a crazy that was looking to get back on some people that wronged him. It's clear he acted alone rather than 'defected' to any sort of opposing side.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> You're mixing together two different things; or maybe I was.<br /> <br /> I was disputing the idea put forward that IN GENERAL we are "fine" with the deaths of innocents or the bombings of hospitals when it's our guys doing it.  I don't think that's true at all.  I'll concede that we're more likely to accept it if our side did it, but we still consider it a bad, not-desirable thing, and personnel can get court-martialed for the deaths of innocents, depending on the circumstances.<br /> <br /> Regarding this guy in particular, while from what I've seen he wasn't targeting civilians, folks do get outraged when a person betrays an oath and plans the deaths of the people they've sworn to stand beside and defend.  Maybe that's childish, but I think a lot of us take such oaths seriously.<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Emperors Faithful wrote:</cite><blockquote class="uncited"><div>War is an awful thing, and I don't think anyone else in the thread is going to agree that it's "fine" that weddings, funerals, or hospitals have been bombed.  Generally these are seen as terrible things, to be avoided if possible in the future.  </div></blockquote>That's very naive coming from you, Mannahnin.<br /> <br /> Of course the general public think both terrorist attacks and civilian bombing are terrible things. The people actually involved and fighting however may not have any such qualms.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I come from a military family.  My dad never went into combat (was only Airborne briefly when he was young, then went career later in the Army Reserves, Corps of Engineers), but I've certainly been around a lot of military personnel including guys who've been in combat.  In my experience they can be a bit jaded to the horrible things you see and do in war, but they take them seriously, don't enjoy them, and try to avoid them.  Matty is the exception, not the rule.  And some of that obviously springs from his intolerance/ability to write people off as "other" or virtually inhuman.  Guys like that are out there, but they're not the majority of combat personnel, by any means.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3144337.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3144337.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 1 Aug 2011 22:59:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Mannahin wrote:</cite>Matty is the exception, not the rule. And some of that obviously springs from his intolerance/ability to write people off as "other" or virtually inhuman. Guys like that are out there, but they're not the majority of combat personnel, by any means. </div></blockquote><br /> In all honesty, I think it's a Royal Marine thing.  I've known a few in my time, and they're all pretty much the same in that regard.  I seriously think it must be the way that they're trained - 'cheerfulness in the face of adversity (i.e. unspeakable horror)', and all that...<br /> <br /> It's not a front, though.  He's really like that, though in real life he comes across as more 'jocular barbarian', as opposed to 'hate-filled face-biting lunatic'.<br /> <br /> <br /> Matty? You still there, or are you banned again?  <img src="/s/i/a/c944477abc92c1c101da485e07ff06d8.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3145429.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3145429.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:07:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Albatross]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Our Marines are pretty similar.  There's some nice grim, callous humor of the like in Generation Kill, if you haven't checked it out.<br /> <br /> That said, there's a bit of a difference between that and literally not caring whether our soldiers/Marines blow up a hospital or not.<br /> <br /> Of course, we have to take into context how Matty means it when he says he doesn't care about the death of anyone he hasn't personally met,   He always expresses that in a way which comes off much more offensively than he really means it, as I recall.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3145530.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3145530.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Aug 2011 04:46:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mannahnin]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Terrorist attack on Ft. Hood prevented.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Mannahnin wrote:</cite>Our Marines are pretty similar.  There's some nice grim, callous humor of the like in Generation Kill, if you haven't checked it out.<br /> <br /> That said, there's a bit of a difference between that and literally not caring whether our soldiers/Marines blow up a hospital or not.</div></blockquote><br /> Well, does anyone really give a gak?  Like, <i>really</i>?  I mean, people <i>say</i> they care about stuff like that, but I'm convinced that, much of the time, they say it because that's what one is <i>supposed</i> to say.  Or, like Emperor's Faithful, they pretend to care about people in third-world countries in order to impress girls with pink hair at their college.  <img src="/s/i/a/3280d57d913d8178fb42a55db16d1e89.gif" border="0"> <br /> <br /> Hama was attacked by the Syrian armed forces the other day.  They used tanks on civilians, and lots of people are thought to be dead.  Did you give a feth?  Or did you just react with bored resignation like I did?  Obviously, I'd prefer it if gak like that didn't go down, but in truth I don't really care either way.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3147006.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/386286/3147006.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:00:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Albatross]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>