Ovion wrote:I realise in true form, they die a lot... but this is 4 models that will do... nothing. They won't really hit anything with their 4 shots a turn, they won't hurt anything, and pretty much every weapon will instant death them regardless...

Making them WS3, BS2, S2, T2, W3, I3, A1, Ld4, Save 6+.
Beasts

would be better, and even then they'll still drop in 1 turn.

Ovion wrote:I realise the patheticness is canon, and it's a joke, BUT my point was, they're going to do diddly, and die to everything instantly.

It needs to be a little clearer too... even as is something like:



Even being able to bring them back, they'll do exactly nothing.

Imagine you have say.. your average 1500 pt game.

You start at least 24" apart, you either need to hold objectives or aqquire enough kill points.. and the HTF... all die before they move 12-18".

Masonicon wrote:

xxmatt85 wrote:Stub pistol stats?

just read Warhammer 40000 Wargear book

Blacksails wrote:I genuinely can't tell if all of these proposed units of yours are serious or elaborate trolls.

That may be harsh, but honestly, none of the units you've posted have either;

a) added something new and unique to the game in terms of fair and balanced game play
b) adhered to even a smidgen of 40k fluff
c) been remotely balanced, whether OP or in this case in a weird twist, UP

Its all fine and dandy to want to add in new and unique units to your friendly 40k scene, but by posting this on the internet you open yourself up to more serious critique. Much of this board is used for legitimate balancing queries or serious fandexes with the occasional humourous ones (well done ones I might add), so posts like this discussing HTF in 40k won't be taken seriously by most of the board.

Maybe I'm just missing the point, but you couldn't pay me to play against a list like this. It wouldn't present any kind of challenge or fun, and it wouldn't even be funny. Then again, I think I watched HTF a decade ago, so maybe I'm just old and bitter now.