<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Codex Updates missing Black Templars...next?"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/6.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Codex Updates missing Black Templars...next?
While reading the codex updates, what I am surprised no one is talking about, is what wasn't in the update.

The necrons, sisters and black templars were not mentioned. The necrons and sisters make sense, if the rules were in development at the same time as sisters/necrons, they wouldn't want to compound a problem of new rules and new codex, but why not templars?

Unless they are next??

Just pontificating, what do you all think?

I wrote some more detailed thoughts about it on my vanity, wait I mean hobby blog at http://armyundecided.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-we-can-infer-from-what-wasnt-in.html]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/422663/3779759.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/422663/3779759.page GMT Re:Codex Updates missing Black Templars...next? ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/422663/3779772.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/422663/3779772.page GMT Re:Codex Updates missing Black Templars...next?
Kroothawk wrote:Actually it is better posted in the Black Templar news&rumour thread, where this is already discussed.


Makes sense now. Where were you ten minutes ago when I was posting? Sheesh.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/422663/3779774.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/422663/3779774.page GMT