<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/7.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> has "repackaged" their boxes of infantry for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span>. Each box will only have one sprue instead of two, so only half the models, at 25.50 USD instead of 33 USD. Massive price increase for anyone into or interested in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span>.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801686.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801686.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:36:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Tzeentchling9]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Wasn't that license supposed to end in 2010? <br /> <br /> I've not seen a single game of it played ever and it doesn't interest me, so when it does end it means more resources for WFB that are sorely needed.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801739.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801739.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 02:54:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Aerethan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I like the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LoTR</span> minis.<br /> <br /> Of course, that's because I traded the one's my sister's ex-boyfriend gave me for my first Flames of War minis! <img src="/s/i/a/baf5f2e54c6b17d5c5d39aecadfa1272.gif" border="0"> But the Goblin warrior pack was always good for games of D&D... I might have to go find one now. <br /> <br /> Ah, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>. Master of stealth price increases. I guess this is in preparation for The Hobbit. <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801764.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801764.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:01:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ infinite_array]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In all honesty this isn't surprising. WFB orcs went from 19 models at $35 to 10 models for $29 in one day. That's a 63% increase per model.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801773.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801773.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:04:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Aerethan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This showed up in N&R earlier this week... it's a bummer for sure <img src="/s/i/a/dec8d79950a36218cfae9200a43fa59f.gif" border="0"><br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/423128.page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/423128.page</a><br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801801.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801801.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:10:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ RiTides]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's a shame, they were great in non-heroic scale armies, but are really becoming to expensive<br /> <br /> At least a lot were sold so they shouldn't be too hard to pick up second hand, I do have a couple of nice units of Rohan in my desk]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801839.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801839.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:22:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Murdock129]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I wonder what they will come up with for the Hobbit? They already have the Battle of Five armies game, but I'll wager there will be some new releases just in time for the films. Maybe thats why the price is going up now.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801852.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801852.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:24:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ snurl]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Aerethan wrote:</cite>Wasn't that license supposed to end in 2010? <br /> <br /> I've not seen a single game of it played ever and it doesn't interest me, so when it does end it means more resources for WFB that are sorely needed.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I still don't think that's what would happen.<br /> <br /> I think they'd cut <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> and then cut all the staff that worked on it. You<br /> end up with the same amount of resources devoted to WFB.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801864.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801864.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:28:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ malfred]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ That would be a damn shame as they could easily divide the staff up between <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and fantasy and release models and books faster than the current schedule(although perhaps they don't want to for some reason).<br /> <br /> For all we know, that one book writer for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> is dying for a chance to revamp Wood Elves!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801875.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801875.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:32:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Aerethan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Aerethan wrote:</cite>That would be a damn shame as they could easily divide the staff up between <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and fantasy and release models and books faster than the current schedule(although perhaps they don't want to for some reason).<br /> <br /> For all we know, that one book writer for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> is dying for a chance to revamp Wood Elves!</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> He  might want to, but they might not want to ramp up the<br /> release schedule. They'd end up having less work for less peeople.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801982.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3801982.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:12:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ malfred]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've never seen a game of it played, ever. I've gone to many a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(38);'>FLGS</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> stores. I've seen the display game, tried it once with a redshirt, but I've never seen someone actually play the game.<br /> <br /> Upping the price just seems like another nail in the coffin. If it meant more resources being put towards <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and fantasy I wouldn't mind at all if <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> died.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802013.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802013.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:23:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Necroshea]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Necroshea wrote:</cite>I've never seen a game of it played, ever. I've gone to many a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(38);'>FLGS</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> stores. I've seen the display game, tried it once with a redshirt, but I've never seen someone actually play the game.<br /> <br /> Upping the price just seems like another nail in the coffin. If it meant more resources being put towards <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and fantasy I wouldn't mind at all if <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> died.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> And just because you've seen no one play doesn't mean it isn't played. <br /> <br /> I hardly ever see a lot of games that I see played at conventions like<br /> Little Wars, but the kinds of people who play them play in their basements<br /> and not at shops.<br /> <br /> There were <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WOTR</span> games being played at Adepticon the last several years.<br /> <br /> I don't mean to be obtuse about this, but I think everyone has to back<br /> off of the whole "the end of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> will mean more <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(147);'>WHFB</span>." I think<br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> counts their beans and knows how much money they can get out<br /> of any given <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>/Fantasy release, which is probably why they have<br /> such a slow release now. If they cut <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WOTR</span> I'm guessing they'll<br /> either cut those resources or they'll find a brand new non-<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>/Fantasy<br /> related project for them to work on. <br /> <br /> This stuff is not taking people away from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>/Fantasy. If they thought <br /> they could make more money with more <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>/Fantasy releases, they'd do it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802021.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802021.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:26:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ malfred]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well, yeah, of course. I don't see people playing chess ever but that doesn't mean people don't play it (it makes me sad too, I LOVE chess).<br /> <br /> Anyways, I seem to have come across as one of those types who actually think the fall of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> would effect others. I merely meant to say if it DID impact <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> or fantasy in a positive way then I wouldn't miss it, otherwise I really don't care what they do with that line. The worst it does to me is fill up a 1/3 of white dwarf, but then again I don't really buy those either.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802032.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802032.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:30:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Necroshea]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> is not going to let the Perry twins go. They are the main sculptors for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span>, and did a lot of other <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> before that.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802044.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802044.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:37:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ snurl]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>snurl wrote:</cite><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> is not going to let the Perry twins go. They are the main sculptors for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span>, and did a lot of other <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> before that.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Right, but they're also not going to increase production to accommodate them.<br /> <br /> They'll send projects the Perry twins way that they would have otherwise<br /> given to other sculptors, and they won't ever have to increase production.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802059.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802059.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:47:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ malfred]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Perhaps resources that could go towards specialist games...<br /> <br /> A boy can dream of a new Mordheim release can't he?<br /> <br /> I'm still interested in when the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> license is supposed to expire.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802176.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802176.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:40:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Aerethan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Aerethan wrote:</cite>Wasn't that license supposed to end in 2010? <br /> <br /> I've not seen a single game of it played ever and it doesn't interest me, so when it does end it means more resources for WFB that are sorely needed.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Actually, it means less net income, so LESS resources for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(147);'>WHFB</span>.<br /> <br />  <img src="/s/i/a/baf5f2e54c6b17d5c5d39aecadfa1272.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802512.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802512.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:39:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kaldor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Kaldor wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Aerethan wrote:</cite>Wasn't that license supposed to end in 2010? <br /> <br /> I've not seen a single game of it played ever and it doesn't interest me, so when it does end it means more resources for WFB that are sorely needed.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Actually, it means less net income, so LESS resources for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(147);'>WHFB</span>.<br /> <br />  <img src="/s/i/a/baf5f2e54c6b17d5c5d39aecadfa1272.gif" border="0"> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(267);'>QFT</span>!<br /> <br /> All the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>-fanboi wishlisting and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>-hate was old back in 2001 when I first came across it.  The notion that somehow <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> deprived the  other games systems of resources has time and time again been proved to be demonstrably false!  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> ramped up their staff (for instance they employed Mat Ward and Adam Troke specifically to work on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>) resources to produce <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> stuff over and above their <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and WFB stuff.  Similarly <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> was released *alongside* not *instead of* their core games.  And, to put it mildly, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> earned them a crap-ton of cash.  Cash that was invested in the plastics design and manufacturing process.  Simply put, without <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> then <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> would not have produced the Baneblade and subsequent similarly complex models.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> players should be on their knees grovelling in thanks at the feet of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>, not spouting the usual bile and hatred.  Which, folks, I have to say is simple ignorance.<br /> <br /> The next time someone spouts the old "<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> spoiled my Warhams, wah wah wah", then feel free to call them an ignorant fool, because simply put, that is the objective truth. If they had one ounce of common sense, and spent one minute doing some actual research, then they would not hold that stupid, foolish, incorrect and ignorant opinion.<br /> <br /> All <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(71);'>IMHO</span> of course.... <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802578.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802578.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:18:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Osbad]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Osbad wrote:</cite>[(for instance they employed Mat Ward and Adam Troke specifically to work on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>) resources to produce <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> stuff over and above their <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and WFB stuff.  </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> That is just one more reason to hate <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> then.  <img src="/s/i/a/baf5f2e54c6b17d5c5d39aecadfa1272.gif" border="0"> <br /> <br /> All the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> hate really comes from the fact that when it was released it took over alot of space in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(143);'>WD</span> that was devoted to other things like specialist games.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> came out at the same time that all Specialist Games support was cut in the company, so it gave the perception that it had a part to play in that.<br /> <br /> At least that is my reason to dislike it. It signaled the initial downfall of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> from miniature gaming company that made cool games to evil corporation only interested in sucking money from their playerbase.<br /> <br /> Would <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> have survived without the cash cow that where all the kids buying <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> miniatures because of the movies (without ever playing the game)? I don't know, but I bet my left kidney that if it did survive then we wouldn't be seeing all the carp "milk them for all they got and give nothing back" atitude that we see today...  <img src="/s/i/a/934fe4f0c85983a716e6680a72065e99.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802626.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802626.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:40:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ PhantomViper]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>PhantonViper wrote:</cite>All the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> hate really comes from the fact that when it was released it took over alot of space in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(143);'>WD</span> that was devoted to other things like specialist games. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Wrong wrong wrong wrong!  Count the pages.  When they released <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> they increased the page count of the magazine.  They took NO resources away from WFB or <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(143);'>WD</span> has fluctuated over the years in page count and content.  But generally speaking <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> was an addition in the magazine, not a substitution.<br /> <br /> Seriously, I doubt the people who come up with this garbage can even count!  How much effort is it to count the pages in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(143);'>WD</span> and come up with actual facts instead of spouting 2nd hand nonsense opinions like this one?<br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>PhantomViper wrote:</cite><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> came out at the same time that all Specialist Games support was cut in the company, so it gave the perception that it had a part to play in that.<br /> <br /> At least that is my reason to dislike it. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Which again, is erroneous.  Lack of support for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> was entirely the problem of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> and NOTHING <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(421);'>TO</span> DO WITH <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span>.  If <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> had been profitable then they would have continued.  They were not, and NEVER WERE.  It is well documented that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> realised they were going up a blind ally with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span>'s trying to turn them into long term revenue streams.  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> becoming popular did not somehow magically make <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> less popular and therefore cause <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> to drop them.  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> were NEVER popular enough to generate the level of support their fans demanded.  So that support was cut.  END OF STORY.<br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>It signaled the initial downfall of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> from miniature gaming company that made cool games to evil corporation only interested in sucking money from their playerbase.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Again.  Totally.   Fallacious.   In fact, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> continued to expensively support <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> to a level not justified by revenue streams right up until they axed the Fanatic Studio in 2004.  That's a 4 year period after they took on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> licence and only 1 year before the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> bubble broke.  A massive length of time in the business world.     And again, without the subsidy of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> profits, axing Fanatic was a decision they would have been financially forced to do years earlier!<br /> <br /> Lets get it clear: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> was always going to fail.  It was a broken business model.  The sales volumes NEVER justified the amount of support that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> chucked at them and fans became to feel entitled to.  NEVER.  Even at its height, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(168);'>BFG</span> for instance was only a tiny blip of revenue compared to any of the core games.  Simply put, the "lead tail" was never there in the first place for these games. Fun as they were.  Only Epic 40000 came close, and that was killed by the 2nd edition rules fiasco, long before <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> was even a glint in Peter Jacksons eyes.<br /> <br /> It is also a matter of record that Kirby was not overly in favour of taking on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>, it was the staff that persuaded him in the end.  He and other senior managers knew it would be a bubble and that this would cause management headaches when the share price ultimately returned back to "normal" levels.<br /> <br /> Sure, I recognise that during the "Bubble" period <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> management got "fat and lazy" (Kirby stated so himself in the 2005 annual report), but that was not directly the fault of the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> success, more the case that they took <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and WFB fans for granted, assuming  there was no competition and that they would continue to grow revenues without having to chase customers.  An entirely different kettle of fish.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> So please.  Get the facts straight and stop belileving this errant nonsense.  It carries about as much conviction as the Loch Ness Monster.<br /> <br /> *rolls eyes*<br /> <br /> And Viper, I'm not trying to pick on you.  I apologise if I come over excessively harsh,.  It isn't directed at you personally.  But after 11 years now of this absolute nonsense being repeated in every <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> forum I have ever participated in, I am getting heartily sick of it.<br /> <br /> People have a right to an opinion, even a demonstrably erroneous one.  This the internet after all  I have a right to get annoyed with foolish opinions, even if I don't have a right to insult those that hold them <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0"><br /> <br /> <img src="http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0909/headdesk-demotivational-poster-1252553095.jpg" border="0" />]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802748.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802748.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:37:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Osbad]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Osbad wrote:</cite><br /> <br /> Wrong wrong wrong wrong!  Count the pages.  When they released <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> they increased the page count of the magazine.  They took NO resources away from WFB or <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>.<br /> <br /> ]</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I think there was the one issue with 2 pages of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>, and that may have been what prompted the whole 'White Hobbit magazine' jokes that were going around at the time. <br /> <br /> I completely agree with the rest of your points however. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802787.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802787.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:57:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Pacific]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[  Indeed.<br /> <br /> <br />  One would suggest in fact that we will, in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> stores anyway, see the focus shift away from the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WOTR</span> <b>battle</b> game as the 3rd core/key game, and see the emphasis be placed once again on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> <i>skirmish</i> game.<br /> <br />    ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802797.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802797.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:03:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ reds8n]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Pacific wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Osbad wrote:</cite><br /> <br /> Wrong wrong wrong wrong!  Count the pages.  When they released <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> they increased the page count of the magazine.  They took NO resources away from WFB or <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>.<br /> <br /> ]</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I think there was the one issue with 2 pages of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>, and that may have been what prompted the whole 'White Hobbit magazine' jokes that were going around at the time. <br /> <br /> I completely agree with the rest of your points however. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I wouldn't disagree that from time to time one core game will dominate the whole magazine&gt;. This happened this month with the new Vamp Counts which dominate the magazine to the detrement of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>.  It is irritating, but it is what <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> have always done in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(143);'>WD</span> and is not a result of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> specifically.  <br /> <br /> There were plenty of balancing occasions when <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> got barely any coverage and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> or WFB dominated.  It is a matter of mathematical fact that overall (until I stopped counting a few years back) there was no less <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> and WFB coverage ON AVERAGE after the inclusion of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> than before it.  Any individual issue may vary, but that is just one datum (or a handful).  On average, the size of the magazine increased in 2001 and only dwindled again in the mid noughties when they ran into profit problems and foisted the godawful &quot;BUY THE&nbsp;GIANT&quot; issue on us.<br /> <br /> Again.  I don't deny they dropped the ball on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> in the early noughties, but it would have happened anyway.  It was not <u>BECAUSE OF</u> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>.  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> may have delayed them spotting the problems, but that is a very different issue, and on the whole the benefits of the revenue from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> more than outweighed they problems of distraction when it came to improving the hobby for players.  <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> dropped the ball on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> because they thought they didn't have really have to try very hard to make the model range sell well.  <br /> <br /> Sorry to bang on like this.  Didn't realise I was so sore about it! <img src="/s/i/a/c944477abc92c1c101da485e07ff06d8.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802804.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802804.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:08:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Osbad]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I can't understand the dislike of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LoTR</span>, I thought it was a good system and preferred it to Warhammer. It felt more realistic and I liked how it managed to reflect the Hero aspect of the main characters.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802828.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802828.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:22:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Wolfstan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Osbad wrote:</cite>Lots of probably true stuff</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I was talking mostly about perception and the proof of that is that you've been hearing the same stuff for the past 11 years, because that was the perception that was passed at the time, that it is true or false really doesn't mater after all these years.<br /> <br /> And you really can't judge the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> solely by the revenue that they generated by themselves... They were gateway games into the "<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> hobby" and also served as an outlet for players that were burned out of the main games.<br /> <br /> Without them, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> players started to turn to other companies for smaler games and for "diferent" games from their core 2 and that has hurt <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> more than the smaler ROI on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> would have.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802842.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802842.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:38:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ PhantomViper]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So, according to a previous poster, we can thank <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> for the Finecast(<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(448);'>tm</span>) debacle? <br /> <br />  Cheers.......]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802853.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802853.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:50:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sarpedons-right-hand]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ But how does this make any sense? The demand for the product is terribly low as is, raising the effective price is just going to lower it to be non-existent. They already don't move the product in stores enough so it's just sitting in warehouses and on floorspace wasting capital. It's like they're intentionally trying to waste money and kill revenue.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(126);'>tl</span>;dr: <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://1.<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(260);'>bp</span>.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802857.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802857.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:52:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Surtur]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Surtur wrote:</cite>But how does this make any sense? The demand for the product is terribly low as is, raising the effective price is just going to lower it to be non-existent. They already don't move the product in stores enough so it's just sitting in warehouses and on floorspace wasting capital. It's like they're intentionally trying to waste money and kill revenue.<br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> You are forgetting the core rule of corporate <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>. Price rises don't have to make sense, they are ALWAYS the right strategy!  <img src="/s/i/a/5d13fa41280d6fdef786d41bc175d3f6.gif" border="0"> <br /> <br /> But this price increase is just a positioning strategy to take more money out of future buyers when the Hobbit movie comes out. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802866.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3802866.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:56:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ PhantomViper]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>reds8n wrote:</cite> Indeed.<br /> <br /> <br />  One would suggest in fact that we will, in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> stores anyway, see the focus shift away from the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WOTR</span> <b>battle</b> game as the 3rd core/key game, and see the emphasis be placed once again on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> <i>skirmish</i> game.<br /> <br />    </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I believe that this is precisely the reason for the shift. In <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span>, the new boxes are only 1 1/2 companies; utterly useless. When debating this with my <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span> buddies (there are quite a lot of us in our area), this was the conclusion we came to. The only other possibility (a bit of a wishlist, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(72);'>imo</span>) was that they were trying to sell off the old sprues in preparation for new models.<br /> <br /> <br /> <span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal;">Automatically Appended Next Post:</span><br /> <blockquote><div><cite>PhantomViper wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Osbad wrote:</cite>Lots of probably true stuff</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I was talking mostly about perception and the proof of that is that you've been hearing the same stuff for the past 11 years, because that was the perception that was passed at the time, that it is true or false really doesn't mater after all these years.<br /> <br /> <b>And you really can't judge the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> solely by the revenue that they generated by themselves... They were gateway games into the "<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> hobby" and also served as an outlet for players that were burned out of the main games.</b><br /> <br /> Without them, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> players started to turn to other companies for smaler games and for "diferent" games from their core 2 and that has hurt <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> more than the smaler ROI on the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(215);'>SG</span> would have.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> They were definitely gateway games. I know several people that only got into it because of Blood Bowl or something similar. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3803420.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3803420.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:36:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ spyguyyoda]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ how about we learn from the past, and when the hobbit minis come out, don't waste your money on that garbage. No one plays <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> war games, and the 5 people that do at conventions might not justify you getting it.<br /> <br /> Plus, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> constantly craps on it's customers with contempt and hate, stop supporting their QUICK CASH IN crap like this.<br /> <br /> I have never seen a single game of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>lotr</span> played since it came out, and I play around the world. I know if any of my friend even bring the hobbit minis up, I am telling them full stop to not bother, and go buy something else instead.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3804232.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3804232.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:43:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ BuFFo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I saw six people playing <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span> last night at my <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(38);'>FLGS</span>...<br /> <br /> I know dozens who buy the models but have no intention to play the games related, they just like the models.<br /> <br /> Shame about the price hikes but not unexpected.  Not that I was going to buy any new releases in Finecast anyway.  I'd buy more plastics but won't at these new prices. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3804340.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3804340.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:12:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Consul Scipio]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Surtur wrote:</cite>But how does this make any sense? The demand for the product is terribly low as is, raising the effective price is just going to lower it to be non-existent. They already don't move the product in stores enough so it's just sitting in warehouses and on floorspace wasting capital. It's like they're intentionally trying to waste money and kill revenue.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(126);'>tl</span>;dr: <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://1.<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(260);'>bp</span>.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg</a></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> is actually very popular, but very rarely played in the same places as <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> largely because of the attitudes of the players.<br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>BuFFo wrote:</cite>how about we learn from the past, and when the hobbit minis come out, don't waste your money on that garbage. No one plays <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> war games, and the 5 people that do at conventions might not justify you getting it.<br /> <br /> Plus, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> constantly craps on it's customers with contempt and hate, stop supporting their QUICK CASH IN crap like this.<br /> <br /> I have never seen a single game of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>lotr</span> played since it came out, and I play around the world. I know if any of my friend even bring the hobbit minis up, I am telling them full stop to not bother, and go buy something else instead.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Well, thats a constructive attitude you've got there.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> is actually a very widely played system, and requires very little start-up, especially for people already in the hobby. Perhaps you could instead encourage your friends? Who knows, you might actually have fun!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3805810.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3805810.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:14:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kaldor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>Lotr</span> was always a great game and always used to be very affordable, but now its not at all worth it so I long stopped playing (I wanted to recreate the battle of the last alliance, but...yeah I'd rather play flames of war now and recreate the battle of stalingrad or berlin)<br /> its a shame because it was actually pretty popular back in the day, and it was always a dear favorite (I had a whole hobbit army...erm well I still do)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806163.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806163.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:30:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lord Poison]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Tzeentchling9 wrote:</cite><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> has "repackaged" their boxes of infantry for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span>. Each box will only have one sprue instead of two, so only half the models, at 25.50 USD instead of 33 USD. Massive price increase for anyone into or interested in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span>.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Just another reason why I only play 1 system; Warhammer 40,000. It keeps me busy enough, and I never have a problem finding a game. I don't understand folks that try to play multiple systems and armies, especially with the price shenanigans from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>.<br /> <br /> They absolutely can't be trusted.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806173.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806173.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:33:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ NoArmorSave]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>NoArmorSave wrote:</cite><br /> Just another reason why I only play 1 system; Warhammer 40,000. It keeps me busy enough, and I never have a problem finding a game. I don't understand folks that try to play multiple systems and armies, especially with the price shenanigans from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>.<br /> <br /> They absolutely can't be trusted.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I... I don't even know how to respond to this. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806179.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806179.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:38:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ infinite_array]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Kaldor wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Surtur wrote:</cite>But how does this make any sense? The demand for the product is terribly low as is, raising the effective price is just going to lower it to be non-existent. They already don't move the product in stores enough so it's just sitting in warehouses and on floorspace wasting capital. It's like they're intentionally trying to waste money and kill revenue.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(126);'>tl</span>;dr: <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://1.<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(260);'>bp</span>.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg</a></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> is actually very popular, but very rarely played in the same places as <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> largely because of the attitudes of the players.<br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>BuFFo wrote:</cite>how about we learn from the past, and when the hobbit minis come out, don't waste your money on that garbage. No one plays <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> war games, and the 5 people that do at conventions might not justify you getting it.<br /> <br /> Plus, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> constantly craps on it's customers with contempt and hate, stop supporting their QUICK CASH IN crap like this.<br /> <br /> I have never seen a single game of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>lotr</span> played since it came out, and I play around the world. I know if any of my friend even bring the hobbit minis up, I am telling them full stop to not bother, and go buy something else instead.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Well, thats a constructive attitude you've got there.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> is actually a very widely played system, and requires very little start-up, especially for people already in the hobby. Perhaps you could instead encourage your friends? Who knows, you might actually have fun!</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Prove it. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> gives little support to it in comparison. And the only time ive seen it competitively played is at large conventions and then they have 1/15th of the players of the other two systems.<br /> <br /> Prove to me that its profitable because it seems like it is just a drain on profits and has been for the last 6 years]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806219.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806219.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:55:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ChocolateGork]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>ChocolateGork wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Kaldor wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><cite>Surtur wrote:</cite>But how does this make any sense? The demand for the product is terribly low as is, raising the effective price is just going to lower it to be non-existent. They already don't move the product in stores enough so it's just sitting in warehouses and on floorspace wasting capital. It's like they're intentionally trying to waste money and kill revenue.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(126);'>tl</span>;dr: <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://1.<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(260);'>bp</span>.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/TSpzcGV0LRI/AAAAAAAANZ8/d1gCIm9UgsI/s1600/scanners4.jpg</a></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> is actually very popular, but very rarely played in the same places as <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> largely because of the attitudes of the players.<br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>BuFFo wrote:</cite>how about we learn from the past, and when the hobbit minis come out, don't waste your money on that garbage. No one plays <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> war games, and the 5 people that do at conventions might not justify you getting it.<br /> <br /> Plus, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> constantly craps on it's customers with contempt and hate, stop supporting their QUICK CASH IN crap like this.<br /> <br /> I have never seen a single game of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>lotr</span> played since it came out, and I play around the world. I know if any of my friend even bring the hobbit minis up, I am telling them full stop to not bother, and go buy something else instead.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Well, thats a constructive attitude you've got there.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> is actually a very widely played system, and requires very little start-up, especially for people already in the hobby. Perhaps you could instead encourage your friends? Who knows, you might actually have fun!</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Prove it. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> gives little support to it in comparison. And the only time ive seen it competitively played is at large conventions and then they have 1/15th of the players of the other two systems.<br /> <br /> Prove to me that its profitable because it seems like it is just a drain on profits and has been for the last 6 years</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I have seen a few people play it here on the west coast. It is an interesting looking system and has nice models, but is not worth it. Not by a long shot. <br /> <br /> The financial commitment is obscene. This latest crap about packing half the models in the same box for the same price has me fumming, and I don't even play the game.<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> pulls the same crap with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span>. It is one of the main reasons I won't be getting any new armies. I am sticking with the ones I already own.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806225.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806225.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:00:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ NoArmorSave]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>ChocolateGork wrote:</cite>Prove it. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> gives little support to it in comparison. And the only time ive seen it competitively played is at large conventions and then they have 1/15th of the players of the other two systems.<br /> <br /> Prove to me that its profitable because it seems like it is just a drain on profits and has been for the last 6 years</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I couldn't care less if you believe me or not. Go look it up yourself if you're interested. I'm not about to start doing your homework for you. I mean, you can always just stick your fingers in your ears and go "Na na na, I'm not listening" but I'd like to think an enlightened gentleman such as yourself would prefer to argue from a point of knowledge, not ignorance.<br /> <br /> Not everyone who collects the models, plays the game. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> has a much wider fanbase than just wargamers, after all. And not everyone who games, does so at a competitive level, and not everyone who games at a competitive level will actually attend competitions, and not everyone who attends competitions will go to multi-system events, where you as a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> player can witness them!<br /> <br /> So the number of gamers you've personally witnessed doesn't mean diddly.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806288.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806288.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:40:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kaldor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Where would i look it up?<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> obviously considers the game as a lesser to the other two systems.<br /> <br /> I have never heard any discussion of it or seen causal games played at the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(38);'>FLGS</span> and the small amount of stock of it they carry has never moved. I know one person who collected a bit of it and then never played it more than twice.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806341.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806341.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:05:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ChocolateGork]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ive always liked the game to be honest it got me into all the other miniatures games. I believe its still my fav, what they should have done is not change the infantry boxes but instead change the starter because it blows big time.<br /> <br /> Whem i first got into the game they had starters for like each army that were amazing then they just fell off the earth and i think thats when it kinda died out.<br /> <br /> Although i think the new prices were made for younger people seeing how everytime i see a kid trying to buy models there parents give them around 20 to 25 dollars.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806363.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806363.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:15:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cody20]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I really like <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LOTR</span> but only one of the  two stores really play it, and the store that dose is 4 hours away if not more, it'll be a shame if the prices go up so much but if you think a box of marines have 10 in and that's £20.50 and now the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>lotr</span> will be 12 for about £16 so compared to other systems it's still relatively cheap.<br /> <br /> -madman12367]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806383.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806383.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:28:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ madman12367]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(370);'>WotR</span> is doomed if they think these price hikes are going to be received well by their <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> based consumers. As Reds8tan noted earlier about pushing more towards the skirmish game... it matches <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>'s Modus Operendi. <br /> <br /> Sell few models for inordinately exorbitant prices to make up for the fact that your consumer base is shrinking by the year.<br /> Why sell more models at a reasonable cost for bigger games when you can sell less models for greater cost in smaller games and make nearly as much money? One answer would be to retain loyal customers, but <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> have shown time after time they clearly do not want you, even though you are putting food in their ungrateful mouths.  <img src="/s/i/a/053f30f6773034eb25223d86f0e00d8d.gif" border="0"> <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>Osbad wrote:</cite>All the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>-fanboi wishlisting and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span>-hate was old back in 2001 when I first came across it.  </div></blockquote><br /> Also <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(267);'>QFT</span>. I was one of those <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> trolls crying like a vagina with sand in it about <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> after I found the 1st version of the game to be lackluster. Even I thought the crybaby bull doo-doo was old and stale at that time.<br /> <br /> According to Harry, infamous Warseer prophet of all things <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> whose track record is emaculate:<br /> <br /> <blockquote class="uncited"><div>The Games <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(29);'>Dev</span> and the sculpting team have been expanded over the last 12 months.<br /> My understanding is that one of the reasons for this is so they can give <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> and The Hobbit the attention it needs whilst not impacting on the capacity of the studio to continue to knock stuff out at an alarming rate for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> and fantasy. (To avoid what happened last time around).</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> To reinforce Osbad's and Malfred's point made earlie, resources are not being taken away. They are being added. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> existing in the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> catalog is nothing but a good thing for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(147);'>WHFB</span> consumers.<br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><cite>BuFFo wrote:</cite>how about we learn from the past, and when the hobbit minis come out, don't waste your money on that garbage. No one plays <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LotR</span> war games, and the 5 people that do at conventions might not justify you getting it.<br /> <br /> Plus, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> constantly craps on it's customers with contempt and hate, stop supporting their QUICK CASH IN crap like this.<br /> <br /> I have never seen a single game of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>lotr</span> played since it came out, and I play around the world. I know if any of my friend even bring the hobbit minis up, I am telling them full stop to not bother, and go buy something else instead.</div></blockquote><br /> Because I think sharp british wit is needed here, I will rely on a quote by the esteemed John Cleese:<br /> <b>"Yes, well, that's the sort of blinkard, philistine pig-ignorance I have come to expect from you non-creative garbage."</b><br /> <br /> <br />  <img src="/s/i/a/053f30f6773034eb25223d86f0e00d8d.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806514.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806514.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:39:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Hellfury]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Run go buy up your lotr/wotr!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Another problem for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> and the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LoTR</span> game is that it's not their's. Yes they get to make buckets of money out of it, but ultimately they don't have full control over it. I can see that this would bug <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>. There was no reason that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(86);'>LoTR</span> couldn't of been bigger and better than Warhammer, the background has been around for years and it has all the traditional races you see in fantasy, but and it's a BIG but, it's not theirs. At some point they could and will lose control of it so I would imagine this has some bearing.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806587.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/423833/3806587.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:26:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Wolfstan]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>