<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "New LRBT idea"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net New LRBT idea stats
BS, F, S, R
3, 14, 13, 12

Rules: (I Don't know a name for this rule yet)
becuase the Leman Russ Vindacator has large amounts of armor, It need to roll a D6 for movement and a roll of a 1 is immobilise.
The tank may not take side sponsons.

Ammo - At the start of your shooting turn you can choose to have The Leman Russ Vindactor shoot AP or Heat rounds.
AP Round is Str 9 ap 2 roll 2d6 on armor penetration.
HEAT round is Str 8 ap 3 large blast.

so its realy either a battle cannon shot or vanquisher shot.

points - 200 mabey 210.
what do you think?

EDIT: Missed a rule.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867461.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867461.page GMT New LRBT idea 2d6 to penetrate and 250-275 points is sorta justified - it's super overkill but will also be the main target for any kind of shooting]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867477.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867477.page GMT Re:New LRBT idea
Rear AV12 isn't needed and really hurts some armies that rely on close combat to crack tanks (namely Orkz).

Then again, I think the most sensible thing to do for balance purposes is allow the vanquisher to take a high explosive shell, but make it S8 AP3 small blast, for 10pts. Same cost as a demolisher, and gives you the option to go anti-tank or anti-meq in a pinch while not making the other variants obsolete or redundant.

]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867592.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867592.page GMT Re:New LRBT idea
Blacksails wrote:I personally don't see a point in the tank really. You'd be better off just giving the vanquisher the option to fire battle cannon shells at +x pts (maybe 10-20 ballpark).

Rear AV12 isn't needed and really hurts some armies that rely on close combat to crack tanks (namely Orkz).

Then again, I think the most sensible thing to do for balance purposes is allow the vanquisher to take a high explosive shell, but make it S8 AP3 small blast, for 10pts. Same cost as a demolisher, and gives you the option to go anti-tank or anti-meq in a pinch while not making the other variants obsolete or redundant.



Id run vanquishers if this was true.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867734.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3867734.page GMT New LRBT idea LRBts should be able to choose the type of ammo they shoot, eg HE AT and incendiary if modern tanks can, why can't ones 40000 years later do the same or better?]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3868244.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3868244.page GMT New LRBT idea http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3868247.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3868247.page GMT New LRBT idea LRBT is totally cool right now? I use it and have no complaints, there are plenty of choices and it is completely worth its points.
I think for the different shells it would be better to simply have the Vanquisher be able to fire normal shots as well, which would make it really good.
The standard LRBT really needs no changes.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3869090.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3869090.page GMT New LRBT idea http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3869097.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427340/3869097.page GMT