<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Senario NEEDS HELP!"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Senario NEEDS HELP!"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Senario NEEDS HELP!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ok, my friend wants to do a planetary empires campaign and came up with his own senario for a 2nd round free for all over the hive city tile.<br /> <br /> The game is a seize ground mission with all ruins counting as objectives (for a total of 7 objectives), and all units counting as scoring (except for immobilized vehicles).<br /> The deployment is dawn of war on a 48" board. This, with the four players planned, will make deployment impossible for the last person going (as each unit has a 18" threat range).<br /> <br /> I suggested that we make it turn-based objectives and turn based deployment, with a rotating turn order. This should negate the effect that going last in a four person game has, which is huge by the way.<br /> <br /> He disagrees, do you have any suggestion for alternative rules?<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427818/3876066.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427818/3876066.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 4 Feb 2012 02:00:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Config2]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Senario NEEDS HELP!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Are you seriously suggesting a 4-player game on a 4-foot-square board? There's a reason the standardized board sizes exist, some armies benefit significantly more from either a more closed-in battlefield or one with more room to maneuver. A 4-foot-square board for anything larger than a 1,500pt battle basically hands victory to the in-your-face armies (Blood Angels, Grey Knights, Tyranids, Space Wolves) over the absence-of-contact armies (Eldar, Dark Eldar, Tau, Guard).<br /> <br /> First off, I'd recommend setting this battle on a 4'x6' board for 1,000pts per person, going up to 4'x8' if you get much larger than that.<br /> <br /> What exactly do you mean by 'rotating turn order'?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427818/3876203.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427818/3876203.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 4 Feb 2012 03:02:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ AnomanderRake]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Senario NEEDS HELP!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The 4 foot board is the only part he refuses to budge on. I know that it is going to be cramped as f***.<br /> <br /> We are playing without any of the non-<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(19);'>CC</span> armies. Rotating Turn order means that the person who goes first in a game turn changes every game turn. It is a randomization thing to mitigate the crazy <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(14);'>BS</span> number of players.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427818/3879710.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/427818/3879710.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 5 Feb 2012 05:13:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Config2]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>