<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Speculation: DA/BT going back to SM Codex."]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Speculation: DA/BT going back to SM Codex."]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Speculation: DA/BT going back to SM Codex.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ With all the rumours about upcoming <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> Codex and 6th Ed Rulebook I was wondering if it's possible that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> might want to make <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> Codex in a similar way.<br /> <br /> - New <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> codex will focus on &quot;veriants&quot; of the same army represented by different legions<br /> - most <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> Legions get Sprue/Transfer Sheet upgrades in time<br /> - <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(25);'>DA</span> are more-less just a variant of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> <br /> - <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> being a trademark army are 4 years behind with codex already surpassed by new stuff in for ex. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(10);'>BA</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> Codexes<br /> - <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(15);'>BT</span> haven't seen upgrade in a long time and don't seem to have as many fans as <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(10);'>BA</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> who fully deserve separate codexes<br /> - Tau and Eldar are already lining up for updates and are rumoured as &quot;soon-ish&quot;<br /> - <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(25);'>DA</span> began to appear more often and might take over Ultramarines as "trademark" chapter - but that would require them to be treated with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> Codex<br /> <br /> So with that in mind, perhaps:<br /> <br /> - New <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> Codex will take on similar approach as <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> -&gt; basic army (for ex Ultramarines) with fluffy variants with their own rulesets<br /> - all beloved chapters like Salamanders, Imperial Fists, White Scars etc - get additional rules and unit variants not dependant on taking <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(67);'>IC</span> as <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(56);'>HQ</span> <br /> - more of 4th ed approach rather than 5th ed<br /> - <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(25);'>DA</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(15);'>BT</span> get included into Codex: <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> and same ruleset / fluff / variants / aditional units treatment as chapters above<br /> - all chapters (including <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(15);'>BT</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(25);'>DA</span>) get neat upgrade sprues at reasonable price <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0"><br /> <br /> Don't kill me - it's just a tought. <br /> What do you think?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/440016/4094717.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/440016/4094717.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:35:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Herr Dexter]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Speculation: DA/BT going back to SM Codex.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Herr Dexter wrote:</cite><br /> - <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(15);'>BT</span> haven't seen upgrade in a long time and don't seem to have as many fans as <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(10);'>BA</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(124);'>SW</span> who fully deserve separate codexes<br /> <br /> - <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(25);'>DA</span> began to appear more often and might take over Ultramarines as "trademark" chapter - but that would require them to be treated with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> Codex<br /> <br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Black Templars are one the most different chapters around: <br /> - operating well above the 1000 cap mad by rowboat girlyman<br /> - Mixing Scouts and Marines <br /> - Emperor's Champion and the vow system<br /> - A chaplain that is harder than Cassius.<br /> - On a permanent Crusade<br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(25);'>DA</span> are fairly different as well:- Ravenwing and Deathwing were their ideas first, Vanilla <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> can do ravenwing but can't add in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(456);'>LS</span> to the squads, Deathwing has been surpassed in effectiveness by draigo wing but is still a really good build for such an old rule set. (6x Squads w/ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(224);'>TH</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(221);'>SS</span> + Cyclone <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(328);'>ML</span> and Belial) but they are only ones who can do both in the same list.<br /> Fluffwise they have a lot more Plasma love than is shown in the rules<br /> The Fallen are also a massive fluff device and good for storys<br /> They may become the "Trademark" Chapter but the main reason the UM are there is because they stick the closest to The CodexAstartes. IE what the majority of loyalist chapters aim to do.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/440016/4094874.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/440016/4094874.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:16:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Hlaine Larkin mk2]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>