http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/7.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Faqs was released:

http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?catId=cat440134a&categoryId=1000018§ion=&pIndex=1&aId=3400019&start=2&multiPageMode=true

So I thought I'd start a discussion thread designed to do discuss the changes GW did or didn't make.

I'll Start:
According to the Imp Guard Faq, if a model has 2 toughness values (ex: 4(5)), You only use the bracketed value. So it seems you use it for id as well. Nurgle Lords are gonna abuse this to the fullest...]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465138.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465138.page GMT http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465156.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465156.page GMT
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/458374.page]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465160.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465160.page GMT
A) Its not a discussion thread, its a post letting people know the faqs out that has a discussion inside it. This is a discussion thread specifically

B) Its in News and Rumors even though the rulebook is released. Dakka Disscussions is more appropriate, don't you think?
]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465165.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465165.page GMT http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465208.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465208.page GMT And even if this wasn't redundant, it wouldn't belong in Dakka Discussions as it is a 40K topic and 40K general topics belong in the 40K general discussion forum.

]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465259.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/458384/4465259.page GMT