<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "The new preffered enemy"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/15.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "The new preffered enemy"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>The new preffered enemy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So does anyone find it odd that in the new rule they mention failed to hit rolls as rolls of 1 would always fail? If you read it in that way its reroll failed to hit rolls as well as wound rolls of 1. Im guessing <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>gw</span> will need to <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>faq</span> this but Im curious what everyone thinks anyways. Also how many people feel given wording problems and general confusion tha this book seems a bit rushed?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/464473/4561441.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/464473/4561441.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:02:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ roland9382]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The new preffered enemy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The wording is a bit odd, but they are saying that  to hit rolls of a 1 can be re-rolled.<br /> <br /> (They could have left out the failed part as all rolls to hit of a 1 are failed).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/464473/4561495.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/464473/4561495.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:21:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ DeathReaper]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>