<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "FW Destroyer Tank Hunter"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "FW Destroyer Tank Hunter"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>FW Destroyer Tank Hunter</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi all, <br /> <br /> This awesome model has not seen a rules update in almost a decade which, to me, is a crying shame, so I'm interested in establishing new (balanced) rules for this baby. My current ideas are:<br /> <br /> Make the Laser Destroyer Str10 AP1 (no brainer to me, this is one of the most high powered and ancient weapons in the imperial arsenal)<br /> Add a targetter (+1 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(14);'>BS</span>)<br /> Add the ability to chose a veteran crew for +10 points, confers Tank Hunters <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(136);'>USR</span> (Only tank aces and the most experienced crews are given Destroyers)<br /> Make it a 0-1 per detachment (They're rare, very very rare)<br /> <br /> I'd raise the point cost slightly from the original 160p to 180p (and +10 for tank hunters)<br /> <br /> This way it's a rare tank that does one thing, but does it really well, compared to the vanquisher it's more limited since it lack secondary armament but you will hit 2/3 of the time and you are more or less guaranteed a pen if you do.<br /> <br /> Comments please? <img src="/s/i/a/c944477abc92c1c101da485e07ff06d8.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4976180.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4976180.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:14:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tracer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:FW Destroyer Tank Hunter</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Laser Destroyers have current rules.  In fact, they are included in the very latest book produced by Forge World.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4977307.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4977307.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:55:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ DarknessEternal]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:FW Destroyer Tank Hunter</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/e5821b8c4135164c177e3c767597bf14.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4977307.page"><b>DarknessEternal wrote:</b></a><br/>Laser Destroyers have current rules.  In fact, they are included in the very latest book produced by Forge World.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> You're thinking of rapiers, this is not a rapier, it's a 72" <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(123);'>Str</span> 10 Ap2 ordnance that does not use a blast marker. It got a mention in august last year when the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(60);'>IA</span>:1 rules were updated but it remained completely unchanged since <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(60);'>IA</span>:1.<br /> <br /> This:<br /> <a href="http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Laser_Destroyer#.UKLkS6Wgf8s" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(146);'>wh40k</span>.lexicanum.com/wiki/Laser_Destroyer#.UKLkS6Wgf8s</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4977382.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4977382.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:16:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tracer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>FW Destroyer Tank Hunter</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I am inclined to agree, though the main problem with the Laser Destroyer is the very same problem the Vanquisher has.<br /> <br /> Not enough enemy tanks to warrant such a destructive and expensive platform.<br /> <br /> Normal anti-tank options for the Guard are lascannons and meltaguns on infantry, and for my armored battlegroup it's demolishers and the regular Russ's <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(123);'>Str</span> 8 Ordnance gun.<br /> <br /> The single-shot, no blast, expensive gun that can one-shot land raiders with ease is a thing of the past, mostly.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4977778.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4977778.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Nov 2012 02:48:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Unit1126PLL]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:FW Destroyer Tank Hunter</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No, I'm thinking of Laser Destroyers.  Rapiers can carry Laser Detroyers; they can also carry other things.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4978283.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/488787/4978283.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:25:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ DarknessEternal]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>