http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net FAQs to remedy the differing interpretations. Most of the FAQs' answers are one word to a question that is a paragraph in length. I would like to see the amount of effort in the response be a direct reflection of the commitment to the hobby as their customers have made through their question. I do applaud the continuous examination of the rules with FAQs, as these do address interpretation issues.

I believe complex examples of implementing the rules is the best method to convey the rules and intent. These examples can be released in the rulebook FAQ and Codex FAQs. The cost is the time making the examples as the online access to the .pdf FAQs is efficient and cost effective. ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5198732.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5198732.page GMT ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5198801.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5198801.page GMT FAQs wants a clearer, more comprehensive explanation. Why they keep them at such abysmal levels, I'll never understand; as you said, the price is only time.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5198971.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5198971.page GMT GW publish detailed rules examples in the Rulebook FAQ and Codex FAQ. An example in the Rulebook FAQ might look like the following:

Example shooting attack: A five man squad of space marines, 4 boltguns, 1 heavy bolter fire at 10 orks. Four orks are within 24" of all the attackers, 4 more are within 36", and one is over 36", and one is not in sight. All boltguns and the heavy bolter are within range of 1 ork and have LOS. All hits from the boltguns and heavy bolter are put into the wound pool and will be applied to the 8 orks that are in LOS and within 36". The 4 orks beyond 24" can receive wounds from the boltguns if the 4 closer orks are removed as casualties....]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5199278.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5199278.page GMT FAQ, yes it would clear stuff up, but I can't see GW investing the time into this. It's just not their mentality towards this game, they even say in their book, ( and I'm para phrasing) It is not a perfect rule set, there are far to many variables in the game to make it so, and sometimes you as the players, will have to make your own calls on the rules.

This is fine, when the game is played in the same spirit with which it was written, as a fun way of playing with your toy soldiers. However it becomes a problem when it gets added into a competitive setting, as the competitive scene demands a more strict and black and white rule set. ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5199708.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/502047/5199708.page GMT