<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Sometimes New is Not Always Better"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/54.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Sometimes New is Not Always Better"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Sometimes New is Not Always Better</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/05/ancient-us-weapon-in-syria/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/05/ancient-us-weapon-in-syria/</a><br /> <br /> The old recoil-less rifle is a functional classic, and I'm not surprised to see it back on the battlefield.  Sadly,like many of the better weapons the US and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span> have produced, their enemies know it's value even when <u>they</u> don't. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/546039/5945831.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/546039/5945831.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Aug 2013 03:20:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ BaronIveagh]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>