SPRING, Texas – At least one person was confirmed dead in a stabbing that took place at a high school in Spring, located about 24 miles north of Houston and just south of The Woodlands.

Wednesday morning, an air ambulance was called to Spring High School following a stabbing report on campus, a hospital spokesman said.

Among those injured was a 16-year-old boy, who was transported by helicopter to Memorial Hermann Hospital in critical condition.

The Harris County Sheriff's Office confirmed one person was dead and a Life Flight spokesman said several people were injured.

The incident was reported shortly after 7 a.m. About an hour and 15 minutes later, video captured images of officers handcuffing two males outside the school.

Unconfirmed reports on Twitter indicated the injuries occurred during a fight in the school's cafeteria.

KHOU 11 News Reporter Jeremy Desel spoke with a parent who gathered with others across the street from the school.

“I’m just trying to make sure that my child is OK,” said Jan, whose son is a junior at the school. "I’ve actually texted and I’ve actually called, they are receiving phone calls. They're in their first-period class and everything is calm.”

According to some parents, many students were unaware of the incident.

“It’s unbelievable, but it seems like it’s a very controlled situation and I’m actually going to go to work," Jan said. "There's nothing I can do out here. I just wanted to make sure they're safe."

Another parent at the scene said he was frustrated at the lack of information coming from police.

“Well, number one we’re concerned about our kids," the father said. "One of my kids was kind of there in the area when they saw it and they’re frantic and scared, and here the police are telling us to move our vehicles. [My son] told me that he's scared and he wants to come home."

The father said his son described the scene to him through text messages.

“They were walking out of the area when it happened, but they sent pictures to me of all the blood everywhere," he said. "All they texted and told me was one died and, out of the total, five were stabbed. All students."

Administrators said all the parents of students affected in the incident were notified.

 Dreadclaw69 wrote:
As Alf says, a coordinated stabbing is unusual outside prison shankings. Is there much/any gang activity in the area?

 reds8n wrote:
Query : Is it usual for people to be in school at that hour of the day ?

 reds8n wrote:
Query : Is it usual for people to be in school at that hour of the day ?

 Kanluwen wrote:

 Dreadclaw69 wrote:
As Alf says, a coordinated stabbing is unusual outside prison shankings. Is there much/any gang activity in the area?

"Coordinated stabbings" are unusual even in prison shankings.

Stabbings are primarily opportunistic occurrences with a small amount of premeditation within.

 juraigamer wrote:
T minus 45 minutes until people start trying to ban knifes.

 Thortek wrote:
Proof guns are not the problem, it is all the idiots with not discipline and stuff. On a side not wonder if Obummer will now try to start a knife ban....I can see it now: High capacity knife blades are to banned, any knife that can shank over 2 inches and isnt a butter knife.

 Kanluwen wrote:

 Thortek wrote:
Proof guns are not the problem, it is all the idiots with not discipline and stuff. On a side not wonder if Obummer will now try to start a knife ban....I can see it now: High capacity knife blades are to banned, any knife that can shank over 2 inches and isnt a butter knife.

Do you realize how absolutely stupid you look when you say things like this?

 MrDwhitey wrote:
And now we wait for someone to say they were all black, and then people will call Frazzled a racist for saying "monkeys".

 Kanluwen wrote:

 Thortek wrote:
Proof guns are not the problem, it is all the idiots with not discipline and stuff. On a side not wonder if Obummer will now try to start a knife ban....I can see it now: High capacity knife blades are to banned, any knife that can shank over 2 inches and isnt a butter knife.

Do you realize how absolutely stupid you look when you say things like this?

 Grey Templar wrote:
Cause you know, Libs just love a good school shooting to justify gun control.

 Howard A Treesong wrote:
If lots more people carried guns, stabbings like these could be prevented. Everyone would be much safer, obviously.

 Alfndrate wrote:


1) Let's give the President the respect he deserves, he is after all, our leader whether you like what he's done or not.

 Alfndrate wrote:


1) Let's give the President the respect he deserves, he is after all, our leader whether you like what he's done or not..

 Thortek wrote:
Proof guns are not the problem, it is all the idiots with not discipline and stuff. On a side not wonder if Obummer will now try to start a knife ban....I can see it now: High capacity knife blades are to banned, any knife that can shank over 2 inches and isnt a butter knife.

 Ahtman wrote:

 Grey Templar wrote:
Cause you know, Libs just love a good school shooting to justify gun control.

And Cons like to think that Libs just love a good school shooting to justify gun control. They are both wrong, but it is what happens when ones mind gets stuck in partisan mode and can't get back out.

-Shrike- wrote:
But seriously, what the actual feth? Who coordinates stabbings at a high school? Kanluwen actually has it right here - stabbing someone is generally opportunistic, and therefore highly unlikely to be a group thing.

I love it when a presidents supporters claim that everyone should respect the president just because he is the president, and the other side claim they'll only respect people who deserve, because it makes me think back to the last time the other team had someone in the whitehouse and all the positions were remarkably reversed

I look forward to a Republican president being elected and everyone switching sides on the issue, again.

 sebster wrote:

 cincydooley wrote:

 Alfndrate wrote:


1) Let's give the President the respect he deserves, he is after all, our leader whether you like what he's done or not.

I don't know that he's earned that respect for many people. Or if he had it once, he lost it.

I love it when a presidents supporters claim that everyone should respect the president just because he is the president, and the other side claim they'll only respect people who deserve, because it makes me think back to the last time the other team had someone in the whitehouse and all the positions were remarkably reversed

I look forward to a Republican president being elected and everyone switching sides on the issue, again.

 Cheesecat wrote:
I don't get why anyone would think any president (regardless if he's/she's republican, democrat or other) should automatically deserve respect as it's usually a very personal thing when it comes to who you respect in life, that being said I have quite a bit of respect for Obama as I think he's a

decent prez.

 sebster wrote:

 Cheesecat wrote:
I don't get why anyone would think any president (regardless if he's/she's republican, democrat or other) should automatically deserve respect as it's usually a very personal thing when it comes to who you respect in life, that being said I have quite a bit of respect for Obama as I think he's a

decent prez.

I don't really get why its a point of debate at all, to be honest. I mean, if you do or don't respect some other person doesn't mean anything to anyone but yourself, really. It might reflect on you, but nothing more than that.

I just think the debate is a bit of a laugh, because people like to pretend that its a non-partisan issue and it doesn't matter who's in the whitehouse, but for many people their position in the debate depends largely on whether its their team in the whitehouse.

 whembly wrote:
Not going to happen in 2016... it's HRC's time... evidently.

 sebster wrote:

 Cheesecat wrote:
I don't get why anyone would think any president (regardless if he's/she's republican, democrat or other) should automatically deserve respect as it's usually a very personal thing when it comes to who you respect in life, that being said I have quite a bit of respect for Obama as I think he's a

decent prez.

I don't really get why its a point of debate at all, to be honest. I mean, if you do or don't respect some other person doesn't mean anything to anyone but yourself, really. It might reflect on you, but nothing more than that.

I just think the debate is a bit of a laugh, because people like to pretend that its a non-partisan issue and it doesn't matter who's in the whitehouse, but for many people their position in the debate depends largely on whether its their team in the whitehouse.

 whembly wrote:

 sebster wrote:

 Cheesecat wrote:
I don't get why anyone would think any president (regardless if he's/she's republican, democrat or other) should automatically deserve respect as it's usually a very personal thing when it comes to who you respect in life, that being said I have quite a bit of respect for Obama as I think he's a

decent prez.

I don't really get why its a point of debate at all, to be honest. I mean, if you do or don't respect some other person doesn't mean anything to anyone but yourself, really. It might reflect on you, but nothing more than that.

I just think the debate is a bit of a laugh, because people like to pretend that its a non-partisan issue and it doesn't matter who's in the whitehouse, but for many people their position in the debate depends largely on whether its their team in the whitehouse.

Yup... if there's an (R) President next, it'll be the same partisan environment, except the teams are swtiched.

Not going to happen in 2016... it's HRC's time... evidently.

 juraigamer wrote:
T minus 45 minutes until people start trying to ban knifes.

 Jihadin wrote:
I do not care what other people say in defense of him when I can out right say and know that he lacks serious experience. Being in the high end of government.

 Jihadin wrote:
My advice for Hillary is to wait another four years. Run in 2020. That way the "Benghazi" will be in the past and most of everyone will have forgotten about it. Granted I love how she went and left Obama holding the "bag". Kerry IMO is not doing so well.

 Cheesecat wrote:

 Ahtman wrote:

 Grey Templar wrote:
Cause you know, Libs just love a good school shooting to justify gun control.

And Cons like to think that Libs just love a good school shooting to justify gun control. They are both wrong, but it is what happens when ones mind gets stuck in partisan mode and can't get back out.

I would say the Libs are at least being somewhat reasonable with gun control as they seem more concerned about the ridiculous gun violence in USA and are more open to changing gun rules to make for a (hopefully) safer nation than say the Cons.

 sebster wrote:

 Jihadin wrote:
My advice for Hillary is to wait another four years. Run in 2020. That way the "Benghazi" Cluster will be in the past and most of everyone will have forgotten about it. Granted I love how she went and left Obama holding the "bag". Kerry IMO is not doing so well.

Outside of the true believers of the Republican party, people barely give a gak about Benghazi now. A week after the original tragedy the story polled with below average levels of audience interest. The idea that it'll register in 2016 is pretty far-fetched.

There are reasons Clinton might not win (or even run), but Benghazi sure ain't one of them.

 Jihadin wrote:
She took full responsibility about the Benghazi incident.

 Jihadin wrote:
Lets not derail the thread like we're the Jesse James gang

 Mr Nobody wrote:
From hell's heart I stab at thee.