<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Without Number Special Rule"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Without Number Special Rule"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Without Number Special Rule</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(411);'>WE</span>'RE BRINGIN' <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(484);'>IT</span> BACK <br /> <br /> But in all seriousness, why was this rule ever taken out of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>? Is it because of AOF special rules? Whatever the reasoning is, 'Nid units like gaunts, rippers, and gargoyles (not to mention cultists, certain daemons, and guardsman even guardsmen already have it to an extent with platoons) It really limits what Tyranids can do when a tau firing line chips away 3 of the 12 hormagaunts in a squad and they end up retreating 8". And it's even worse when <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span> are allowed to bring dozens of soldiers in a single squad because of platoons but the swarm army isn't able to bring broods of more than 30.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/552499/6053588.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/552499/6053588.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Sep 2013 22:46:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ darthnatus]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>