<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Assaulting without a CCW"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Assaulting without a CCW SW units are worded you can give up your CCW for another ranged weapon. What I propose is that if you are locked in CCW, and do not have a specified CCW, you still are considered being armed with a CCW BUT you can only fight at Initiative step 1.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067273.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067273.page GMT Re:Assaulting without a CCW CCW automatically counts as being armed with one, as in, its part of their wargear.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067289.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067289.page GMT Re:Assaulting without a CCW
blood lance wrote:
Rulebook states any model without any form of CCW automatically counts as being armed with one, as in, its part of their wargear.

I know, but then what is the point have having a CCW, if you can hold a flamer in one hand and Bolter in the other. It seems broken that you can rapid fire someone one turn, flame and charge them in the next and still fight at a full initiative step. Or have a scout armed with a sniper rifle peck off units from across the board, then when they get in 12" you rapid fire them, rapid fire them again at overwatch, then if you have a higher initiative you get to hit first.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Also the BRB says specifically stated as having a CCW, they are stated as having one, they just traded it off so they could have a better ranged attack.

If you are going to beef up your ranged attacks that's fine, but you should also lose something in the CCW attacks. Just like if you have two CCW, you have no ranged attacks.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067307.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067307.page GMT Assaulting without a CCW http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067378.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067378.page GMT Assaulting without a CCW http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067384.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067384.page GMT Assaulting without a CCW CCWs like power weapons but with two worse AP.

Chainsword, AP5, S:User, at initiative.

Chain Axe: AP4, S: User +1, unweildy.

Maul: AP6, S: User + 2, at initiative.

Lance: AP5 on charge, AP6 off it, S:+1 on charge, at initiative.

Done.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067419.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067419.page GMT Assaulting without a CCW http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067429.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067429.page GMT Assaulting without a CCW http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067440.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6067440.page GMT Assaulting without a CCW
 Kain wrote:
Make a new class of CCWs like power weapons but with two worse AP.

Chainsword, AP5, S:User, at initiative.

Chain Axe: AP4, S: User +1, unweildy.

Maul: AP6, S: User + 2, at initiative.

Lance: AP5 on charge, AP6 off it, S:+1 on charge, at initiative.

Done.

I approve this idea. ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6083317.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/553314/6083317.page GMT