<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build)"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/14.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) CSM + Daemons of Slaanesh – 2000 points


Note: mistakes in the army list has now been corrected.


I’m currently trying out a very fast and aggressive build for my CSM/Daemon army, and I wanted to hear y'all fine folks opinion on it. So feel free to post a reply to me if you got any advice or criticism for my list .


CSM
HQ
1x Chaos Lord (Brand & power maul, Sigil of corruption, MoS)… 140 points

Troops
8x CSM (meltagun, melta bombs) + Rhino (dozer blades)… 169 points
10x CSM (meltagun, flamer, melta bombs) + Rhino (dozer blades)… 200 points
10x CSM (meltagun, flamer, melta bombs) + Rhino (dozer blades)… 200 points
5x Noise Marines (blastmaster)… 125 points
5x Noise Marines (blastmaster)… 125 points

Fast Attack
5x Spawn (Mark of Nurgle)… 180 points
5x Spawn (Mark of Nurgle)… 180 points


Daemon Allies
HQ
1x Herald of Slaanesh (lesser rewards & greater rewards)… 75 points

Troops
20x Daemonettes (instrument of chaos)… 190 points

Fast Attack
18x Seekers (instrument of chaos, icon of chaos)… 236 points

Heavy Support
1x Soul Grinder (DoS, phlegm cannon)… 180 points]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230224.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230224.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) HS and two FA in the daemon allies? You are only allowed one of each!]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230415.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230415.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) PF on a MoS lord isn't the wisest course- maybe an LC would be better]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230734.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230734.page GMT Re:CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230893.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6230893.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231056.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231056.page GMT Re:CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231058.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231058.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) HQ's/ troops for allied& an additional HQ for primary]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231086.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231086.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build)
 chillis wrote:
agree with Khaine, also PF on a MoS lord isn't the wisest course- maybe an LC would be better
A single AP3 specialist weapon won’t cut it for me. I can dig the LC + PF combo, but is it worth losing out on the Brand though?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 chillis wrote:
If you're playing dfoc. But it's still not legal by that- not enough HQ's/ troops for allied& an additional HQ for primary
Ah I see the problem now lol. This is first time i'm runnig a army this big.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231097.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231097.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) LC over the PF is you're running an MoS Lord. You're changing out the I6 to attack for I1 if you use the PF. If it was the MoN lord I'd say PF would be fine- but you're running NM. That being said, I like a lot of flamers in my NM army with BBoS, doom siren, Baledrakes (it's terrifying). So I'd keep the BBoS]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231145.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231145.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build)
 chillis wrote:
The reason for the LC over the PF is you're running an MoS Lord. You're changing out the I6 to attack for I1 if you use the PF. If it was the MoN lord I'd say PF would be fine- but you're running NM. That being said, I like a lot of flamers in my NM army with BBoS, doom siren, Baledrakes (it's terrifying). So I'd keep the BBoS
What would your opinion be on the power mace? It lets my lord strike at initiative, and AP 4 is a small downgrade from the LC's AP3.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231231.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231231.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build)
 Redcruisair wrote:
 chillis wrote:
The reason for the LC over the PF is you're running an MoS Lord. You're changing out the I6 to attack for I1 if you use the PF. If it was the MoN lord I'd say PF would be fine- but you're running NM. That being said, I like a lot of flamers in my NM army with BBoS, doom siren, Baledrakes (it's terrifying). So I'd keep the BBoS
What would your opinion be on the power mace? It lets my lord strike at initiative, and AP 4 is a small downgrade from the LC's AP3.

A PW can work. Just have to think who will be challenging you/accepting challenges. Will they have an armor save of a 2? then it doesn't matter if you use an LC or PW really. If they have an armor save of a 3, thats a big deal, armor save of a 4= doesn't matter again.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231252.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231252.page GMT Re:CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) LC anyway.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231307.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6231307.page GMT CSM + Daemons 2000 (Aggressive build) CSM's Rhinos- they seem like the kind that could be getting into assault with using melta weaponry and flamers]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6232665.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/562098/6232665.page GMT