<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "How do YOU 40k?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "How do YOU 40k?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>How do YOU 40k?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ When I was last at Games Workshop, some friends and I were wanting to play a 2 versus 2, Warhammer 40,000 game.<br /> The problem was that with a 3000ish point limit for the table, we all wanted to field more than troops and an <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(56);'>HQ</span>, at 750 points a person.<br /> The solution was to have one "war master" per SIDE(the war master is agreed upon by everyone on its side) and each person would field an allied detachment.<br /> The war master was worth 3 victory points, 1 for the killpoint, and 2 for being the war master.<br /> <br /> We played as all players on one side are treated as "battle brothers".<br /> <br /> I have 2 questions:<br /> <br /> The first is what would you change about our game, meaning how would you change the proposed rules above to be more fair?<br /> The other question is what are some cool ways that you "modify" <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>, and what was your reaction?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323841.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323841.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:00:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ yugiohfreak2011]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>How do YOU 40k?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A better solution would be to do away with the 3k points table limit]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323911.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323911.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:37:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dakkamite]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:How do YOU 40k?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree, but the store owner has the limit for time purposes.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323921.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323921.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:40:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ yugiohfreak2011]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>How do YOU 40k?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ What you did seems pretty good. Apocalypse has the same format for picking the 'primary commander' of the force. I don't see much wrong with how you played it.<br /> <br /> In the future you could try mixing it up though.  Use a single <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(187);'>FOC</span> for each side and then determine who will take what slot.  I've seen things like this done and it can make for some interesting games.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323981.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/567296/6323981.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:04:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Matt1785]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>