fallinq wrote:
The overall idea looks cool, but there are a couple of balance issues and things that need clarification.

Team 1 kinda gets the short end of the stick in the team specific special rules. FNP is nice, but it's not as good as getting your entire unit back in reserve (team 3) and still hits with the disadvantage of giving double victory points, a drawback team 2's special rule doesn't have. Was does team 2's special rule have no disadvantage while the others do?

Since the Ork and Tyranid special rules are exactly the same, and they're on the same team, shouldn't it just be one rule? As it is, it's redundant. Also, if the unit comes back from reserve and gets killed again, does the opponent get double victory points again? I'm assuming they get double victory points for the first kill.

The Rearline Guardsman rule says "at the time of a challenge" the player gets an extra 500 pts. This is poor wording, because a Challenge is an event in 40k when one character in close combat challenges an opposing character in the same combat and the opposing character must accept and fight or decline and be out of the action for a turn. I don't think you meant that every time any character issues a challenge, the player in last place puts an extra 500 pts on the battlefield! Maybe you meant for that to be the case, but if so, this rule is ridiculously broken. Issue 4 challenges and you can double your army in a standard game.

I also predict antics with the "give any unit any special rule from the main rulebook" ability that Master Commander grants. Give any unit take Fleshbane? Flying? Monstrous Creature?! Funnily enough, as written the Second-in-Command is by far the worst of these special abilities, making second place on the scoreboard the worst place to be in terms of benefits. Second-in-Command isn't a bad ability, the other two are just way, way more powerful.

 fallinq wrote:
For Rearline Guardsman, I recommend letting the player take an extra percentage of points, instead of a fixed number of points, because if you play different points cost games it will mess things up. 25% may be a bit high. Maybe 10 or 15% more points for their army. So if I'm in last place and I play a 2000 point game, I can take 15% more points than my opponent, or 300 extra points. That's enough to take two bare bones Leman Russes. A challenge to the opponent, but not an insurmountable one if they're getting bonus special rules of their own. Also, just say, "when building their army" or "at the start of each game." While I figured that was what you meant, a Challenge is a rules term in 40k. It means a very specific thing. Now you know.

Yeah, the team rules as a whole could use some balancing. Team 3 has a big benefit and a big drawback. Team 1 has an ok benefit and a big drawback, and team 2 has a weak benefit (cause the bonus is good but staying within 6" is crippling, so most players won't bother for more than one turn) and no drawback.

For Master Commander, I had an idea- At the beginning of the game, the player in first place on the scoreboard may grant any one unit in their army two of the following special rules: Slow and Purposeful, Scout, Infiltrate, Rending (shooting or CC), Rampage, Fleet, Stealth, Hammer of Wrath, Rage, Move Through Cover, Poisoned 4+ (CC only), Monster Hunter, Preferred Enemy, Outflank, Hit and Run, Counterattack, Crusader, Interceptor, Adamantium Will, Acute Senses

I think this list lets the player create a unit that runs the gamut of an "elite, special forces" type squad, while keeping the really ridiculous stuff off the table. Giving an any unit Fleshbane, Armorbane or Melta is a bit much, and giving an entire unit Flying Monstrous Creature would just be silly. As is, a squad like this would be deadly, but not so much that say, 300 extra points couldn't be used to counter it.

With these two rules fixed, Second-in Command is still a bit weak and boring, I haven't thought of what to do with that one yet, but if I have an idea I'll let you know. Whaddaya think? Sound good?