<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "To be bound or not to be?"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net To be bound or not to be? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7144832.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7144832.page GMT To be bound or not to be? CAD 1
1 as HQ, Creed, 2 Troops, 3 in Heavy
CAD 2 to infinity
2 as HQ, 2 troops, 3 in heavy?]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7144891.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7144891.page GMT To be bound or not to be?
 carldooley wrote:
how many troops and tanks do you have?
CAD 1
1 as HQ, Creed, 2 Troops, 3 in Heavy
CAD 2 to infinity
2 as HQ, 2 troops, 3 in heavy?


I recommend this.
You have more tanks? That's great!
CAD 3
CAD 4
CAD 5
Etc, until you've got all the Heavy Support slots your heart desires.

Just make sure you have the 1 HQ 2 Troops for each CAD.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7145053.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7145053.page GMT To be bound or not to be? IG might actually have a better go of it than most people, but that's one of the builds on the extreme end that shows how powerful Objective Secured is. Much of the time the game for the army that isn't bound becomes: "Can I table you (or get really close? No? Ok you win then" Essentially, if it's not a big deal, you had better be bringing some nasty juju to compensate for their troops that are, quite literally, better than your models at grabbing objectives.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7145353.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7145353.page GMT To be bound or not to be? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7145678.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/611937/7145678.page GMT