<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "New White Scars rules review"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "New White Scars rules review"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>New White Scars rules review</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi everyone,<br /> <br /> I have just posted part 1 of my own review on the new White Scars rules from War Zone Damocles. <a href="http://standwargaming.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/new-white-scars-rules-review-part-1.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://standwargaming.blogspot.co.<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>uk</span>/2015/11/new-white-scars-rules-review-part-1.html</a><br /> <br /> The first part covers warlord traits, Relics and the new maelstrom cards. Part 2 (tomorrow) will cover the new formations available. Overall, I like the new rules and formations, they are very thematic for the White Scars and give you some different playing styles to try out and some new rules to use (some of which are incredibly powerful, Hunter's Eye anyone?). <br /> <br /> Are you happy about the new rules? Anyone hoping that other Chapters get similar treatment in future expansions?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8255447.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8255447.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:28:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ corrm]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:New White Scars rules review</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Part 2 of the review covering the new formations is now up <a href="http://standwargaming.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/new-white-scars-rules-review-part-2.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://standwargaming.blogspot.co.<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>uk</span>/2015/11/new-white-scars-rules-review-part-2.html</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257717.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257717.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:50:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ corrm]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New White Scars rules review</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the articles. Clear and concise.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257749.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257749.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:34:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dozer Blades]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New White Scars rules review</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The new Formations in Kauyon are pretty good (the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(757);'>RG</span>'s moreso than the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(149);'>WS</span>', <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(72);'>imo</span>), but they all still fall pretty short of the Gladius, unfortunately. That is not necessarily all bad though, since you could probably play a Talon strike force and still have friends after <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257788.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257788.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:48:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Deschenus Maximus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New White Scars rules review</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/d9acdb07d622b7ee123aac947957a507.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257749.page"><b>Dozer Blades wrote:</b></a><br/>Thanks for the articles. Clear and concise.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Cheers, glad you enjoyed it!<br /> <br /> <br /> <span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal;">Automatically Appended Next Post:</span><br /> <blockquote><div><a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8257788.page"><b>Deschenus Maximus wrote:</b></a><br/>The new Formations in Kauyon are pretty good (the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(757);'>RG</span>'s moreso than the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(149);'>WS</span>', <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(72);'>imo</span>), but they all still fall pretty short of the Gladius, unfortunately. That is not necessarily all bad though, since you could probably play a Talon strike force and still have friends after <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0"></div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I've never used the Gladius, certainly not for the free transports (I simply don't own enough in my Scars to field two battle demi-companies). ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8260987.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8260987.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:26:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ corrm]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:New White Scars rules review</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The Kauyon formations are pretty good. The fact you can use the Battle Demi-Company to gain ObSec on some units and still run a bike focused army with the other formations is great. Perhaps not 500 pts of transports great, but still very good.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8261153.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670275/8261153.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:44:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ casvalremdeikun]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>