<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Betrayal at calth mk Iv vs forge world "]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Betrayal at calth mk Iv vs forge world "]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Betrayal at calth mk Iv vs forge world </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Okay so having just brought the Betrayal at Calth boxed pgame I thought it would be fun to compare the differences in the boxed set and forge worlds models. I have to say they are close the one thing that let's them down for me is the back pack. Please excuse the poor photos poor lighting (I hate winter <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(84);'>lol</span>) as I was saying it almost seems like they have used a normal <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> one instead of re designing one for the model.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8271163.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8271163.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2015 00:09:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ M and C war chilldren]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Betrayal at calth mk Iv vs forge world </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ .]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8271189.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8271189.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2015 00:26:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ M and C war chilldren]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Betrayal at calth mk Iv vs forge world </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The Forge World Legion Mk4's use almost a straight up copy of the 1st/2nd edition Mk7 backpack. (the original <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> Mk4's had an almost exact copy of the 1st edition Mk6 backpack)<br /> <br /> The 'regular <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> backpack' was a visual update/retcon of the Mk7 backpack that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> introduced with 3rd edition. <br /> <br /> The plastic Mk4 pack is a hybrid of the old-style Mk7 and the new-look Mk7, if anything that make's it MORE original than the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> one. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8271259.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8271259.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:11:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Gashrog]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Betrayal at calth mk Iv vs forge world </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I like the backpack more on <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(715);'>BaC</span>, but the legs are better on the forgeworld. <br /> <br /> Honestly, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(715);'>BaC</span> simply because of price]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8272766.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8272766.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:37:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ultramarine Vindictus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Betrayal at calth mk Iv vs forge world </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/cfd40cef47ea95e6948a29e2501d0317.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8271259.page"><b>Gashrog wrote:</b></a><br/>The Forge World Legion Mk4's use almost a straight up copy of the 1st/2nd edition Mk7 backpack. (the original <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> Mk4's had an almost exact copy of the 1st edition Mk6 backpack)<br /> <br /> The 'regular <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> backpack' was a visual update/retcon of the Mk7 backpack that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> introduced with 3rd edition. <br /> <br /> The plastic Mk4 pack is a hybrid of the old-style Mk7 and the new-look Mk7, if anything that make's it MORE original than the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> one. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Thank you this is good to know but I think since they started this herecy stuff that's been what mark 4 looks like I just think it's odd to change it for Batrayal at Calth. Though every one has there own likes and dislikes about every model <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(84);'>lol</span>.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8272862.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/670978/8272862.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2015 01:42:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ M and C war chilldren]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>