<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "The New GW FAQ "]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "The New GW FAQ "]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>The New GW FAQ </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've been out of the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> game for a while do to being busy with <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(281);'>IRL</span> work, but I recently heard that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> was (finally!) looking into doing an an <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> and Errata for 7th Edition. <br /> <br /> If you haven't checked it out yet, you can find a link to their Facebook page with the information posted so far <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Warhammer-40000-1575682476085719/" target="_new" rel="nofollow">here</a>. <br /> <br /> Personally, I think this <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> and Errata is a step in the right direction. We actually have some clarification about what Mastery Levels do (still waiting on an exact ruling on multiple psykers in the same unit) as well as other necessary fundamental clarifications. <br /> <br /> I also appreciate that this is only the "First Draft"; <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> are for once actually listening to the community about what questions they have concerning the game. This can only mean good things for future <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> community engagement. <br /> <br /> However, this <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> does not solve the inherent power disparities between armies in 7th Edition. I think this is where groups like the ITC and others can step in to address the balance issues with their own rules. The ITC is adopting a "wait and see" approach so far, which I think is the right decision. Personally I owuld like to see the ITC use this <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> and Errata in its final form as a baseline, with their own balancing efforts regarding the worst offenders (Eldar, Tau, D-weapons, Invisibility, 2+ re-rollable, detachment limits) being in addition to this <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>. <br /> <br /> What are your opinions regarding the new <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> and Errata?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/690068/8638506.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/690068/8638506.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 7 May 2016 00:50:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TheNewBlood]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:The New GW FAQ </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689826.page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689826.page</a><br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689904.page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689904.page</a><br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689817.page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689817.page</a><br /> <br /> <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689814.page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/689814.page</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/690068/8638517.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/690068/8638517.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 7 May 2016 01:02:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ghaz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The New GW FAQ </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I appreciate the enthusiasm and excitement over a new <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40K</span> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>, any one of the previously listed threads is the place to go for the ongoing discussion about it - thanks!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/690068/8638530.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/690068/8638530.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 7 May 2016 01:19:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Alpharius]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>