<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I thought <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> is a subsidiary of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>, so why are their products kept at an arms length apart? Shouldn't <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> be consolidating rules or aknowledge the presence of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models and incorporate them into the newest rules and formations? Can anyone explain to me why they keep both entities seperate<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8898804.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8898804.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:18:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sturgeondtd]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well....<br /> First, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> can´t keep up with that complete, crazy supplement-spam of late anymore.<br /> Second, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> did that last time with the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>-codex in the 5th edition/Escalation. No clue, why they stopped that.<br /> Third, its <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>. They don´t talk that much with their own subsidiary.... And they tend to change their plans in very weird ways. <img src="/s/i/a/053f30f6773034eb25223d86f0e00d8d.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8898814.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8898814.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:28:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Ankhalagon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> fosters a divide between itself and Forge World. This is rather unique as it's other subsidiary, Black Library, is heavily tied into what <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> main is doing. This can be seen with just how many new <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> releases have a tie in novel. <br /> <br /> If I had to guess why this is the case it is probably because <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> believes <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> main and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> cater to different audiences. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> main mostly caters to younger demographics with an emphasis on recruiting, not retaining. If I had to guess this idea of catering to a younger audience is why <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> is on a crusade of making all of it's models into easy to assemble HIPS kits despite the fact that resin and metal have very useful appplications as a medium. Highly detailed character models as an example. Resin kits are more difficult to assemble especially with the younger demographic <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> main aims at.<br /> <br /> Forge World, on the other hand, caters to older gamers. Their kits are high quality and very expensive. They produce niche miniatures that are harder to assemble than HIPS kits. <br /> <br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> main also refuses to produce rules for things they don't make a model for. Rules for them are a vehicle to sell models. Yes, I realize the expense of acquiring rules would seemingly preclude this notion but a lot of what <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> does is very self contradictory. I also realize that Forge World models are also technically stuff they make. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> sees Forge World models as seperate yet compatible with their rules. <br /> <br /> (Note: I also realize that resin kits can be made in a way that they are easily assembled and other manufacturers do so. And I know Wyrd miniatures are making well detailed HIPS kits. This argument assumes a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> centric perspective.)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8898829.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8898829.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:45:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ TheCustomLime]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yeah its a bit annoying sometimes<br /> But its nothing a quick Email to <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> cant fix]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899244.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899244.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:44:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ commander dante]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think it's because they still want to have <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> seen as a different brand, for whatever reason.  Also, it's likely because you can't buy <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models in a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> store (yet; I heard a rumor somewhere that they were working on consolidating it, at least for ordering), so it would be weird to show things and then say oh but you can't buy this in a store, have to go online and order it from the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>.<br /> <br /> It does suck though, because some of the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> stuff are pretty awesome and really help armies, like for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> the weapons batteries from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> really bring up their stock; if you could have taken a formation of them in Traitor's Hate...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899420.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899420.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:24:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Wayniac]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Given that Mymeara actually has formations that allow the vehicles there in a Craftworld Warhost I think the problem is that most armies' <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> units are in books released before their meta-detachments appeared. If they were to do a 3rd version of Imperial Armour 2 it'd have formations that permit Relic Predators, Sicarians, Spartans, et cetera in the Space Marine meta-detachments, for instance.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899432.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899432.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:30:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ AnomanderRake]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There are a lot of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> codexes.<br /> There is the Vendetta upgrade kit for the Valkyrie for an example.<br /> Most now have <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> kits to replace older <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kits, though, so the numbers are dropping.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899441.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899441.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:37:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Skinnereal]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/f10c3447231558161ec43c8ceb903d45.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899441.page"><b>Skinnereal wrote:</b></a><br/>There are a lot of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> codexes.<br /> There is the Vendetta upgrade kit for the Valkyrie for an example.<br /> Most now have <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> kits to replace older <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kits, though, so the numbers are dropping.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Not...really? Any <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kit that's got rules in a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> book is an alternate sculpt that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> makes a plastic for (The only exception I've found so far is the Vendetta).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899475.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899475.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:56:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ AnomanderRake]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Lack of communication and common strategy, I think. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> is mostly seen (by the company) as their luxury branch. However, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> prices are so high that the price tag isn't different enough anymore to justify <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> being seen as that.<br /> <br /> I'd love to see <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> becoming only 1 thing, making all Imperial Armour stuff 'normal' supplements (like Shield of Baal is, for example).<br /> <br /> I have models that I'm forced to field a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(683);'>CAD</span> if I ever want to put them in the battlefield. Lucky me, IA14 is coming - but how about Dark Eldar players wanting a Tantalus? Why they can't get a nice formation to use it in the field?<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899606.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899606.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:15:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Vector Strike]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8898804.page"><b>sturgeondtd wrote:</b></a><br/>I thought <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> is a subsidiary of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>, so why are their products kept at an arms length apart? Shouldn't <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> be consolidating rules or aknowledge the presence of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models and incorporate them into the newest rules and formations? Can anyone explain to me why they keep both entities seperate<br /> </div></blockquote><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> isn't even a subsidiary, they're just another internal division like Accounting or <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(484);'>IT</span>, they do things that don't have the market to do profitably in plastic. <br /> <br /> But yes, in general the mainline <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> studio do their best to typically pretend <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> doesn't exist and to make <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> as inaccessible as possible. It's very odd. Nobody really has a clear reason as to why. <br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/c9befceba99b8513348859bc6e9f2f49.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899475.page"><b>AnomanderRake wrote:</b></a><br/><blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/f10c3447231558161ec43c8ceb903d45.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899441.page"><b>Skinnereal wrote:</b></a><br/>There are a lot of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> codexes.<br /> There is the Vendetta upgrade kit for the Valkyrie for an example.<br /> Most now have <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> kits to replace older <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kits, though, so the numbers are dropping.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Not...really? Any <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kit that's got rules in a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> book is an alternate sculpt that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> makes a plastic for (The only exception I've found so far is the Vendetta).</div></blockquote>This is true now, but wasn't a few years ago. For a long time the only Vanquisher, Hydra, Exterminator, Executioner, and Medusa and Griffon models (when such were codex units) were <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span>, along with others I'm probably forgetting. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899648.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899648.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:38:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Vaktathi]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>TheCustomLime wrote:</cite>If I had to guess why this is the case it is probably because <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> believes <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> main and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> cater to different audiences.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> This makes the most sense to me. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> not only writes rules in a different way, they have a different aesthetic. I think it shows very well in the character series and their newer word bearer sculpts. The new <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>Gw</span> plastic chosen and kharn look awesome. But the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> chaosified models look much more menacing in a subtle way. Everything <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> just gives of a more mature Vibe to me. <br /> If only they weren't so slow. I would buy almost exclusively from them. They seem to have a vision of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> that matches the lore much more than <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> if you ask me.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900083.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900083.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:51:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Roknar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/2639c6bd2a42e714227b06646829d6ea.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899648.page"><b>Vaktathi wrote:</b></a><br/><br /> <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/c9befceba99b8513348859bc6e9f2f49.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899475.page"><b>AnomanderRake wrote:</b></a><br/><blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/f10c3447231558161ec43c8ceb903d45.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899441.page"><b>Skinnereal wrote:</b></a><br/>There are a lot of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> codexes.<br /> There is the Vendetta upgrade kit for the Valkyrie for an example.<br /> Most now have <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> kits to replace older <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kits, though, so the numbers are dropping.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Not...really? Any <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kit that's got rules in a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> book is an alternate sculpt that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> makes a plastic for (The only exception I've found so far is the Vendetta).</div></blockquote>This is true now, but wasn't a few years ago. For a long time the only Vanquisher, Hydra, Exterminator, Executioner, and Medusa and Griffon models (when such were codex units) were <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span>, along with others I'm probably forgetting. </div></blockquote><br /> The Exterminator had a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> kit. It was metal autocannon barrels, with metal sandbags and a metal Catachan tank commander pointing and poking out of the hatch.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900100.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900100.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:57:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kanluwen]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Right, but they discontinued it for six or seven years during the last part of 3rd through 4th and early 5th before they brought back a plastic kit for it in 2009/2010. Same with the Vanquisher.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900108.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900108.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:01:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Vaktathi]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/2639c6bd2a42e714227b06646829d6ea.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900108.page"><b>Vaktathi wrote:</b></a><br/>Right, but they discontinued it for six or seven years during the last part of 3rd through 4th and early 5th before they brought back a plastic kit for it in 2009/2010. Same with the Vanquisher.</div></blockquote><br /> Yeah, and when they discontinued it--they also removed it from the Doctrines book.<br /> <br /> The only <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(87);'>LR</span> variants in the Doctrines book was the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(89);'>LRBT</span> and the Demolisher.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900175.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900175.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:40:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kanluwen]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Aye, also I think thats when they dropped the Griffon. That book was rather sparse on Armor, however cool the infantry doctrines could be in theory.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900183.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900183.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:44:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Vaktathi]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Talking strictly in fluff reasons: the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models tend to be more rare than the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> ones, so formations make no sense as there aren't enough. This does not include the likes of upgrade kits or armies that are <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> exclusive. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900208.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8900208.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:56:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Big Mac]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/02e8b6ed3367ee77d93f0450ccc430ce.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899606.page"><b>Vector Strike wrote:</b></a><br/><br /> <br /> I'd love to see <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> becoming only 1 thing, making all Imperial Armour stuff 'normal' supplements (like Shield of Baal is, for example).<br /> <br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> You're in luck then - the lines between <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> (and Specialist Games for that matter) are becoming more and more blurred within the company.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901353.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901353.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:33:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cvtuttle]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899420.page"><b>WayneTheGame wrote:</b></a><br/>I think it's because they still want to have <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> seen as a different brand, for whatever reason.  Also, it's likely because you can't buy <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models in a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> store (yet; I heard a rumor somewhere that they were working on consolidating it, at least for ordering), so it would be weird to show things and then say oh but you can't buy this in a store, have to go online and order it from the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(134);'>UK</span>.<br /> <br /> It does suck though, because some of the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> stuff are pretty awesome and really help armies, like for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> the weapons batteries from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> really bring up their stock; if you could have taken a formation of them in Traitor's Hate...</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I was chatting to the guy in my local <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> and he says a big part of the problem is allowing people to order forge world in a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> store would also mean you'd be able to order it in every other retailer and that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> lacks the ability to MAKE that much stuff. he did say he wanted to discuss with his boss the possiability of   of allowing a "ship to store" option for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> to allow people to get around shipping costs though]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901368.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901368.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:39:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ BrianDavion]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/2639c6bd2a42e714227b06646829d6ea.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899648.page"><b>Vaktathi wrote:</b></a><br/>But yes, in general the mainline <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> studio do their best to typically pretend <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> doesn't exist and to make <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> as inaccessible as possible. It's very odd. Nobody really has a clear reason as to why.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> The one that makes the most sense to me is that "main <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>' rules exist as nothing more than sales catalogs for the core range of plastic model kits. If it's mentioned in a codex you can buy a plastic model kit for it at your local Games™ Workshop™ Hobby™ Center™, and if you see it on the shelf at your local Games™ Workshop™ Hobby™ Center™ there are rules for using it. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> doesn't want <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> products in their stores because of the customer service hell that would result from their target market (younger kids) getting <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> kits because their parents don't know any better. Therefore <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> products can't exist in the rules the Games™ Workshop™ Hobby™ Center™ sells.<br /> <br /> (And of course this is no sacrifice since <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> doesn't care about the quality of the rules or fluff they're publishing. After all, if you want to put <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models in your formations then just Forge™ A™ Narrative™ about it!)<br /> <br /> <blockquote><div><a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901368.page"><b>BrianDavion wrote:</b></a><br/>I was chatting to the guy in my local <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> and he says a big part of the problem is allowing people to order forge world in a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> store would also mean you'd be able to order it in every other retailer and that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> lacks the ability to MAKE that much stuff. he did say he wanted to discuss with his boss the possiability of   of allowing a "ship to store" option for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> to allow people to get around shipping costs though</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> This doesn't make any sense at all. If someone wants a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> model it doesn't matter if they order it in the store or at home, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> still has to produce the same exact model for them. The real "<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> in stores" issue is with having stores keep an inventory of <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> products on the shelf, which would require making a ton of extra stuff to distribute to all the stores, most of which wouldn't ever sell. Refusing to sell <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> stuff in their stores is all about keeping the product line separate from their core lines of plastic model kits and badly-written rules.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901611.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901611.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:39:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Peregrine]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In fairness, in addition to unique detachments and formations (the Vraks Unending Horde, the Corsair formations), forgeworld have started tagging some units where they can be used.<br /> <br /> The Kytan, for example (the Lord Of Skulls On Legs), has in its experimental rules the note that it can be substituted for a Lord Of Skulls in any detachment which allows or requires the latter. <br /> <br /> Which - for example - means that you can build a Traitor's Hate Trinity Of Blood featuring three of them, which at just under 1600 points is a nice, useful force analagous to a knight list (rather than the &gt;2500 point Lord of Skulls one).<br /> <br /> <br /> Other than that, there are a few mixed <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span>/Forgeworld formations in the Blood Oath campaign book (the Warhammer World exclusive one).<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901628.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901628.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:52:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ locarno24]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Speaking for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(724);'>KDK</span>.<br /> Fist of Khorne Formation includes the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> Model Kharybdis assault claw. <br /> Brass Scorpion, Blood Slaughter, Chaos Decimator in the Hellforged Hunting Pack.<br /> An'ggrath the Unbound in The Goreguard Formation.<br /> <br /> Those are all <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> Formations including <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901740.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901740.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:18:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SicSemperTyrannis]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ And here's me using <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> formations in my battlehost and replacing Wraithknights with Skathach variants thanks to the Doom of Mymeara imperial armour book... I'm sure when more Imperial armour books come out or get re-released we will see more <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> in basic formations and Decurion style formations ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901881.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901881.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:33:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Torus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm willing to bet a shiny nickel that <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> formations will be coming in the admech + <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> vs tau book. Usable in Gladius and other detachments? No idea. But I'm sure we will get plenty of formations then.<br /> <br /> Just have to wait for them to finish pumping out their Mechanicus and Tau vehicles so they can put everything in the book...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901891.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901891.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:43:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Crazyterran]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/7b8cc7eced63258f4a031e137025b90a.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901740.page"><b>SicSemperTyrannis wrote:</b></a><br/>Speaking for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(724);'>KDK</span>.<br /> Fist of Khorne Formation includes the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> Model Kharybdis assault claw. <br /> Brass Scorpion, Blood Slaughter, Chaos Decimator in the Hellforged Hunting Pack.<br /> An'ggrath the Unbound in The Goreguard Formation.<br /> <br /> Those are all <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> Formations including <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I'd hazard a guess that is the case because those all come from a Warhammer World exclusive supplement, and Warhammer World is the one place on Earth with a physical <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> store.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901895.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901895.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:44:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Matt.Kingsley]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/aa94365cba98e19bd2caa9a55502e76c.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901895.page"><b>Matt.Kingsley wrote:</b></a><br/><blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/7b8cc7eced63258f4a031e137025b90a.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901740.page"><b>SicSemperTyrannis wrote:</b></a><br/>Speaking for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(724);'>KDK</span>.<br /> Fist of Khorne Formation includes the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> Model Kharybdis assault claw. <br /> Brass Scorpion, Blood Slaughter, Chaos Decimator in the Hellforged Hunting Pack.<br /> An'ggrath the Unbound in The Goreguard Formation.<br /> <br /> Those are all <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> Formations including <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> models.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> I'd hazard a guess that is the case because those all come from a Warhammer World exclusive supplement, and Warhammer World is the one place on Earth with a physical <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> store.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Hmmmmm you may be onto something <img src="/s/i/a/baf5f2e54c6b17d5c5d39aecadfa1272.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901909.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8901909.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:51:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SicSemperTyrannis]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is there no FW products in GW Formations/Detachments?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>cvtuttle wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/02e8b6ed3367ee77d93f0450ccc430ce.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8899606.page"><b>Vector Strike wrote:</b></a><br/><br /> <br /> I'd love to see <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> becoming only 1 thing, making all Imperial Armour stuff 'normal' supplements (like Shield of Baal is, for example).<br /> <br /> </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> You're in luck then - the lines between <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(39);'>FW</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> (and Specialist Games for that matter) are becoming more and more blurred within the company.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> Yes, it's great to see this happening. Still, too slow <img src="/s/i/a/39ea8e0dbfb45dcc6b802cd0e198dba3.gif" border="0"><br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8902029.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/702307/8902029.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:10:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Vector Strike]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>