<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Detachment naming conventions"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Detachment naming conventions"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Detachment naming conventions</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ After a number of posts from new or returning players confused by the convoluted nature of detachments and bound armies in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> I've come to the conclusion that a related problem is the lack of clear/consistent terms. I'd like to propose the following convention, see it it'll make things easier.<br /> <br /> Detachment: The basic unit of a bound army. A collection of units assembled according to certain restrictions.<br /> <br /> Three types of detachments:<br /> Meta-detachment: A detachment composed of a number of formations. Decurion, Warhost, Gladius Strike Force, etc.<br /> Formation: A detachment chosen from a constrained set of specifically defined units. Librarius Conclave, Aspect Shrine, Ironstrider Cavaliers, etc.<br /> <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(187);'>FOC</span> (Force Organization Chart): A detachment chosen from a broad selection of units according to their combat role type (<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(56);'>HQ</span>, Troops, etc). Combined Arms Detachment, Allied Detachment, Skitarii Maniple, Inquisitorial Detachment, etc.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/710828/9073192.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/710828/9073192.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:40:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ AnomanderRake]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>