<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Unbound Armies"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/15.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Unbound Armies"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Unbound Armies</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Quick question<br /> <br /> If I were using an unbound army, do I need to fulfil the requirements of a troop choice in its entirety.  Specifically with a guard army - If I took an <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span> Infantry Platoon, would I have to take a Platoon Command Squad and two Infantry Squads (the minimum required in the codex), or could I just take an Infantry Squad, or just a Heavy Weapons Squad, or just a Special Weapons Squad.<br /> <br /> Or though its unlikely to happen, its a possibility with an army selection method I am planning to use from time to time to mix things up, especially in smaller games.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129223.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129223.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:55:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ icn1982]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Unbound Armies</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This has been debated extensively <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/706194.page" target="_new" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/709403.page" target="_new" rel="nofollow">here</a>.<br /> <br /> In summary, it depends on whether you're using the digital edition or the print edition of the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span>/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(682);'>AM</span> codex, as they contradict each other in the way they present the option.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129282.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129282.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:53:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ malamis]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Unbound Armies</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the links, will have a read through them.  Based on your summary and what I have initially read, it comes down to is an infantry platoon a single entry or is it a formation.  As I said, its unlikely to come up for me, and if it does, it would be easy enough to add the missing bits to make it legal.  But I was curious.<br /> <br /> Hopefully with the fall of Cadia we might get a new <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(69);'>IG</span> codex.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129387.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129387.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:03:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ icn1982]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Unbound Armies</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Generally speaking the new printed one would be the correct one. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129729.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/713893/9129729.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:31:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Backspacehacker]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>