<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "New ITC Poll for BAO 2017"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "New ITC Poll for BAO 2017"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ What's y'all take on this?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477674.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477674.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Jul 2017 23:22:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bobsmack]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Link?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477680.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477680.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Jul 2017 23:29:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ DarknessEternal]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ They only sent it to those that are registered for <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(650);'>BAO</span>. Figured it was worth discussing even though it's not a permanent ITC Poll or w/e]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477702.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477702.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Jul 2017 23:43:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bobsmack]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm curious what a warhound would do. Their weakness has always been flyers... but not so much now. <br /> <br /> If I was voting it'd be "layered", "no", "yes". ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477713.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477713.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Jul 2017 23:50:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Lobokai]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Layered, no and yes would be my answers. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477719.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477719.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 6 Jul 2017 23:54:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Hollow]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm a bit disappointed with the Power Level limit. I've played against most of the units they listed save for real Titans and none of them are <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(280);'>OP</span> at all. I took down a Supremacy suit in a single turn without difficulty.<br /> <br /> Layered missions definitely seem good but Space Marine codex is a total toss up. They are probably going to wreck the tournament with the upper hand on new rules/abilities/etc.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477735.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477735.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Jul 2017 00:01:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bobsmack]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Layered, Yes, Yes myself. I feel the current missions aren't particularly interesting and dont offer the same kind of tactical swings unless that a good layered mission might.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477743.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477743.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Jul 2017 00:04:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Requiet]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Layered, no comment, yes.<br /> <br /> Eternal war missions are ass. Even maelstrom is more fun.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477796.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477796.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Jul 2017 00:44:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ERJAK]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's the start of a new edition. They should test EVERYTHING and only after a lot of games between different people they should start layering out house rules.<br /> However, I'd be against using the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> codex because not everyone would have time to read and get used to it, while by July every <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> player already had a look at the indexes.<br /> <br /> My answers would be Current Missions, Yes and No.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477820.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477820.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Jul 2017 01:02:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Vector Strike]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Layered Objectives - Yes; the ones currently in the book are pointless, the battles don't last long enough or are lopsided against artillery and the like. Turn by turn objectives sound great.<br /> <br /> Giant units - Leaning towards no; I'm against Forgeworld/large units in general for the balancing issues they have. Allowing super massive units would skew <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(167);'>TAC</span> lists and anti-armor requirements even further. That said, a solid mission list might alleviate this pain, as it's only one model.<br /> <br /> Spacemarine/other Codexs - No; until all the codexs are released, armies that have a codex versus armies that do not, are simply unfair; and likely heavily unbalanced.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477834.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477834.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Jul 2017 01:09:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ fe40k]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New ITC Poll for BAO 2017</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nearly every single Tournament has a requirement that new releases must be out for a minimal amount of time before becoming legal.<br /> <br /> That's just basics...<br /> <br /> I'm not even saying to disallow Codex until all are released<br /> Just that you need time to practice against new stuff.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477843.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/731896/9477843.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 7 Jul 2017 01:17:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Talamare]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>