<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Triarch Stalker's baselessness"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Triarch Stalker's baselessness
Secondly, lets move straight to the point. In my humble opinion, a Triarch Stalker should be forced to use some adequate base. It would make measuring distances much easier and your opponent wouldn't need to struggle with removing casualties from below of its legs & forelimbs. It would also make it more clear to determine the total zone of influence and the exact number of models that could be assaulted&hit by the Stalker. As well as, it would make it easier for hostile models to proceed into direct engagement.

What do you folk think?

Cheers!]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867435.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867435.page GMT Re:Triarch Stalker's baselessness http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867442.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867442.page GMT Triarch Stalker's baselessness http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867469.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867469.page GMT Triarch Stalker's baselessness
 Lance845 wrote:
It would be nice, but it follows the same rules as a rhino or land raider. It has no base, so you measure to the model. I don't understand the difficulty.

Consistency is the key here IMO. Boxy vehicles are easier to measure to/from by far. Providing it a base like the dunecrawler would be pretty neat.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867552.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9867552.page GMT Triarch Stalker's baselessness http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9868234.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/752348/9868234.page GMT