<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Great unclean one/Rotigus justifiable?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Great unclean one/Rotigus justifiable?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Great unclean one/Rotigus justifiable?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Howdy!<br /> I really love the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>Guo</span> model and want to get one for my Purge/<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(528);'>DG</span>/Daemons soup of an army. From my understanding though greater daemons are not in a good place in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span> at the moment, and as much as i love the model I don't want to get a model that will just collect dust on a shelf. Can someone justify why Rotigus or the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>Guo</span> would have a place on the battlefield?<br /> Personally I have about 45% Death Guard, 45% <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> and 10% nurgle daemons, so using the bell to revive daemons would be pointless for me atleast ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10605090.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10605090.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:02:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Truckules]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Great unclean one/Rotigus justifiable?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I love rotigus and if your opponent is stupid enough to allow him to get close he will destroy almost anything. But he will never get close enough he is to slow and even deep striking he will be out of range to shoot on the turn he lands. He can still cast and charge charge but if you fail the charge he is dead next turn]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10609735.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10609735.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:49:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ darthryan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Great unclean one/Rotigus justifiable?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If you have Myphitic Blight Haulers, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>GUO</span> with Bell can resurrect them.  I wouldn't do it in a tournament, but playing that combo and another big guy like a Knight or Mortarion (so they have to choose between them and the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>GUO</span>) would be fun and pretty strong in a casual setting.  It leaves little room for infantry (to go with the Myphitic Blight Haulers), but I like <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(776);'>MBHs</span> even without them - I shoot with them until they're in charge range, they do pretty good with their CHOMPS.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10609814.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10609814.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:59:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Aleister_Dakka]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Great unclean one/Rotigus justifiable?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The problem with the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>GUO</span> (and rotigus) is the same problem all the greater daemons face. They are a large dangerous model that you'll never be able to hide from the enemy and they are just not tough to kill.<br /> <br /> This means that most opponents will just blow them off the board during their first turn, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>GUO</span> is really squishy with a 5++/5+++ he'll go down to focused fire from anything.<br /> <br /> Compounding the issue they are also alot slower than the other greater daemons meaning even if you go first the enemy will have plenty of time to deal with them.<br /> <br /> It is a great model though so here's my beat bet to getting use out of one. High threat target saturation, bring him with Morty, a couple of damon princes, plague drones and crawlers. Most of that is more threatening than a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(233);'>GUO</span> meaning they will struggle for options having to kill a load of hard targets.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10609930.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10609930.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:19:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ WisdomLS]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Great unclean one/Rotigus justifiable?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hmm, well I do have a somewhat "assaulty" army with bloat drones, maulerfiend, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DP</span>, Rhino rush, bikes, spawns and so on that would put the preassure on my opponent. So perhapps Rotigus could advance and cast a few pshycic powers and hoppefully be able to assault something turn 2. Or at least wreck havox around the middle of the field. <br /> But still, it's alot of points for a single model. Can't help woundering of those points are better spent on lets say a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(775);'>PBC</span> and another <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(262);'>DP</span> or something.<br /> Gues I'll just have to wait and see what <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(18);'>CA</span>-19 brings to the table.<br /> Thanks for the response guys]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10612548.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/781631/10612548.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:06:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Truckules]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>