<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Strategic Reserves Vs Tallarn Ambush ?"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Strategic Reserves Vs Tallarn Ambush ?"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Strategic Reserves Vs Tallarn Ambush ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br /> Strategic reserves have the advantage of only costing 1 <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(707);'>CP</span>/ 1-9 Power Level but  cant arrive in the enemy deployment zone on turn 2.<br /> <br /> Tallarn Abush costs 3CP  but I can bring 3 units of whatever I want , one can be tanks, and can deploy into the enemy deployment zone ?<br /> <br /> So Tallarn Ambush is still pretty good ?<br /> Am I missing anything ?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/790125/10870791.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/790125/10870791.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 19 Jul 2020 06:55:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ keithandor]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Strategic Reserves Vs Tallarn Ambush ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think that most reserve stratagems are going to be better than the default one. However, the disadvantage would be that you can't take a mix of units up to 3cp, just 3 units. So you could take a pair of hellhounds and 6 infantry for the same cost as ambush.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/790125/10871171.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/790125/10871171.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 19 Jul 2020 18:32:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Trickstick]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>