<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Something I noticed."]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Something I noticed. Why in the Zog did GW think a 2+ invuln was too powerful on a 4 wound grot, to the point they made it a shadow field. I know it’s the 9th ork codex, where fun goes to die but just reading the rules this was completely unexpected.
I guess you could throw him in front of a big model, but it’s not like he’s t6 and 10 wounds or something.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/804568/11345277.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/804568/11345277.page GMT Something I noticed.
Either way, it is pretty dumb, but just be glad we even kept it to begin with, versus something else that's more useless.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/804568/11345306.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/804568/11345306.page GMT Something I noticed.
 Some_Call_Me_Tim wrote:
What In morks name did they do to Makari?
Why in the Zog did GW think a 2+ invuln was too powerful on a 4 wound grot, to the point they made it a shadow field. I know it’s the 9th ork codex, where fun goes to die but just reading the rules this was completely unexpected.
I guess you could throw him in front of a big model, but it’s not like he’s t6 and 10 wounds or something.


Having a 2++ character perform actions and occupy table quarters or deployment zones could have caused problems in the long run. He got a 10 point drop for the troubles, so I think he is better off now.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/804568/11345521.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/804568/11345521.page GMT