<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "missing deamonology..."]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "missing deamonology..."]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>missing deamonology...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Sorry I have recently returned to <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(3);'>40k</span>, making a classic ulthue eldar force to enjoy at maximum the brand new super funny phsicyc fase...(as an old warhammer fantasy player  <img src="/s/i/a/dec8d79950a36218cfae9200a43fa59f.gif" border="0"> )<br /> In the meanwhile I would like to start really slowly a caos force (actually for the first time in both the sistems), with a powerfull phsycic fase as well.<br /> now help me please to understand...the beautiful demonology (malefic) discipline, with all those funny conjurations, can be used by space marines but not by chaos marines or chaos deamons?!<br /> Is cause this two codexes are 6th edition? ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181677.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181677.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:46:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Marfuzzo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>missing deamonology...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If I'm not mistaken the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span> says that unless stated otherwise all non-Nids psykers can use both Daemonologies.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181707.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181707.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:59:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CrashGordon94]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:missing deamonology...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There are <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span>'s for both Chaos codexes (<a href="http://www.games-workshop.com/resources/PDF/Errata/Warhammer_40000/Chaos_Space_Marines_EN.pdf" target="_new" rel="nofollow"><span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span></a> & <a href="http://www.games-workshop.com/resources/PDF/Errata/Warhammer_40000/Chaos_Daemons_EN.pdf" target="_new" rel="nofollow">Daemons</a>) that add the Malefic discipline, plus as Crash says, the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BrB</span> allows it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181805.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181805.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:58:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Quanar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:missing deamonology...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So my farseer too could choose from both malefic and santic also if is specified (santic) in the codex?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181913.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181913.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:57:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Marfuzzo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>missing deamonology...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No, you use Craftworlds codex as written. The exception only applies to the codexes that came out before the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(13);'>BRB</span>.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181977.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181977.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:32:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Crimson Devil]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:missing deamonology...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/5c671ae704a627413ed9b9c480a31c9a.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8181913.page"><b>Marfuzzo wrote:</b></a><br/>So my farseer too could choose from both malefic and santic also if is specified (santic) in the codex?</div></blockquote><br /> Specifically saying Sanctic seems to "state otherwise", then again I saw a big thread arguing about that. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8182174.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8182174.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:55:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CrashGordon94]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>missing deamonology...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Codex trumps rulebook, but <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(36);'>FAQ</span> trumps both. Eldar may only use Sanctic, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(305);'>GK</span> may only use Sanctic, Inquisition may only use Sanctic, Any psycher with the Daemon special rule may only use Maelific (so all psychers from the daemons codex, daemon princes from <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(22);'>CSM</span> and the possessed sorceror from Crimson Slaughter).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8182178.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/666626/8182178.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:59:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Drasius]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>