<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Dominus formation."]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Dominus formation."]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So the "battle box" deal for skitarii leaked.  Sadly it has nothing to do with objective secured.  Its actually kind of a disapointment.   An army that has access to <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(14);'>bs</span> 7 6 and 5 potentially in the game hardly needs a reroll failed hit rule.<br /> <br /> Edit:  On closer inspection, its not bad at all.  Its free, units you will probably be using, and every turn without the hinderence of -<span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(149);'>ws</span> modifiers.  Also good to get another unit that wont die to gets hot from 9 plasma shots (probably)<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8361576.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8361576.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 6 Jan 2016 07:01:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orock]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I hope that most of these formations are like this one.  Little to no restrictions other than needing to have the units in it.  That way, if I wanted, I could replace the Terminator Captain from the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(119);'>SM</span> formation with a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(805);'>AA</span> Captain with a Storm Shield.  Hopefully the Tyranids one doesn't require the Hive Tyrant to be a walking type.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8361580.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8361580.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 6 Jan 2016 07:06:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ casvalremdeikun]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's gona say that you get bonuses for your flyrant footslogging with a regular speed of 6". They're evolving from explictly flying to finally walking on foot - a thing long forgotten.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8361592.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8361592.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 6 Jan 2016 07:12:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ koooaei]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Not bad at all. Another way for me to get the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(746);'>CM</span> models I like without having to field the ones I don't (servitors and suckpriests). <br /> <br /> I'll probably stick with the Kastellan maniple though.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8362141.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8362141.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:32:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ the_scotsman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A single Onager rocking a Icarus Array with re-rolls as well as another unit of Vanguard with Plasma Calivers with t-linked is pretty good, all without being forced to use a <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(673);'>DI</span>. Also, if you run Dragoons or Sicarians in the rest of your force, you'll be using the <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(149);'>WS</span> buffs at some point, and having re-rolls on a portion of your force might not be a bad thing.<br /> <br /> I think the formation has its uses, but <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(325);'>tbh</span>, I'm just happy I can use a Dominus in a smaller Skitarii force. It's a sweet model, and being included in this boxed set is just pure gravy to me.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8363505.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8363505.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:47:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ the_Armyman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It still frustrates me that they printed two separate books, instead one despite constantly treating it as one army. My skitarii just don't know the mechanical love of a Tech Priest's cold tingly touch.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8363525.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8363525.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:57:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ aka_mythos]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There's a rumor that a combined Codex comes this year with 2 more Battle Bots and a Flyer.<br /> The Salt Mines aren't running dry, but it IS something <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> would do to cash in.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364214.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364214.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:40:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Thairne]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'd settle for a transport]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364442.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364442.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:44:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Orock]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Does the Dominus formation data sheet include all their characteristics, point costs, upgrades, etc?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364536.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364536.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 14:39:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jreilly89]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/1dcc9cbee11952e7f5a44ff4da499a1a.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364536.page"><b>jreilly89 wrote:</b></a><br/>Does the Dominus formation data sheet include all their characteristics, point costs, upgrades, etc?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> We don't know yet. But I don't see why the box would. This isn't Stormclaw or Shield of Baal where it's meant to be a pseudo-starter set for two players. I would imagine that they expect you to buy TWO codexes and rulebook to play with your toys and be a good consumer <img src="/s/i/a/6d3c0a908a3861135dfaebde91c0ecf6.gif" border="0"> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364772.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364772.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:35:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ the_Armyman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It might just have a quick reference sheet with pre-set equipments and just enough rules for you to use them.<br /> <br /> If you want customizability, you'll probably need the codex and rulebooks.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364921.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364921.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:45:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MechaEmperor7000]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/8d05275ee13bf70e6194675ec99a65ad.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364214.page"><b>Thairne wrote:</b></a><br/>There's a rumor that a combined Codex comes this year with 2 more Battle Bots and a Flyer.<br /> The Salt Mines aren't running dry, but it IS something <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> would do to cash in.</div></blockquote> It would be just like they did to the Imperial Knights, by replacing books so soon.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365076.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365076.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:59:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ aka_mythos]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/4969ec9512a0a38e20ea4bf353b5a78e.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365076.page"><b>aka_mythos wrote:</b></a><br/><blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/8d05275ee13bf70e6194675ec99a65ad.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8364214.page"><b>Thairne wrote:</b></a><br/>There's a rumor that a combined Codex comes this year with 2 more Battle Bots and a Flyer.<br /> The Salt Mines aren't running dry, but it IS something <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(50);'>GW</span> would do to cash in.</div></blockquote> It would be just like they did to the Imperial Knights, by replacing books so soon.</div></blockquote>Was the knight codex invalidated by the new codex, or is it possible to still play with the old one using a Paladin or Errant and still be more or less the same ruleswise?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365137.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365137.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:32:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ casvalremdeikun]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/654057ba1bb551acf9ad74231f5f421a.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365137.page"><b>casvalremdeikun wrote:</b></a><br/>Was the knight codex invalidated by the new codex, or is it possible to still play with the old one using a Paladin or Errant and still be more or less the same ruleswise?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> In terms of the mini's rules, the Errant and Paladin stayed the same I think. <br /> <br /> However the formations and detachments changed, as well as the whole concept of Seneschal and such (those are granted based on formations and warlords now I think rather than by a dice roll). <br /> <br /> Basically only the two unit profiles remain unchanged. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365144.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365144.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:34:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MechaEmperor7000]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/6589eaac7f9e3e0c07e0f50256e97fd9.jpg" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365144.page"><b>MechaEmperor7000 wrote:</b></a><br/><blockquote><div><img src="https://www.dakkadakka.com/s/i/a/654057ba1bb551acf9ad74231f5f421a.png" height="20" border="0">&nbsp;<a href="/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365137.page"><b>casvalremdeikun wrote:</b></a><br/>Was the knight codex invalidated by the new codex, or is it possible to still play with the old one using a Paladin or Errant and still be more or less the same ruleswise?</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> In terms of the mini's rules, the Errant and Paladin stayed the same I think. <br /> <br /> However the formations and detachments changed, as well as the whole concept of Seneschal and such (those are granted based on formations and warlords now I think rather than by a dice roll). <br /> <br /> Basically only the two unit profiles remain unchanged. </div></blockquote><br /> <br /> You can use the data sheets from the first codex, but none of the warlord traits or seneschal rules.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365306.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365306.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:47:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ JamesY]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dominus formation.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Just like any codex, some stays the same some changed. I bought the books to play full Knight armies just as I bought the Skitarii to play a full army.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365819.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/675468/8365819.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jan 2016 23:54:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ aka_mythos]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>