<![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Invisibility fixed by working both ways?"]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/16.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Invisibility fixed by working both ways? CC? This at least makes it have a down side and people would have to think about using the power for anything more than some level of protection on getting where they need to go.

Just a brain fart that hit me after a few beers ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631251.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631251.page GMT Re:Invisibility fixed by working both ways? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631255.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631255.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631261.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631261.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways? WC and I'd be cool with it. Would be more interesting as something you put on an objective camper or as a way to cross open spaces with high priority units.]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631270.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8631270.page GMT Re:Invisibility fixed by working both ways?
Full scatter like I'm firing barrage out of LOS. But seriously, just let me drop the hammer and wallop invisibles with Blasts and Templates. ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8636243.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8636243.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637100.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637100.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways?
Martel732 wrote:
Or make it so attacking ends the spell.

^^^This, so much this!]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637163.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637163.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637177.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637177.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways?
 Galef wrote:
Martel732 wrote:
Or make it so attacking ends the spell.

^^^This, so much this!


I already said that...]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637333.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637333.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways?
 Tactical_Spam wrote:
 Galef wrote:
Martel732 wrote:
Or make it so attacking ends the spell.

^^^This, so much this!


I already said that...


Ima go ahead and cast greater invisibility thanks? (3.5 joke)

but yeah would be nice if it did end once you attacked or charged. it makes it more specific for assault units to get into position to do things or positioning troops for better shots. instead of the auto i win spell.

]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637337.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8637337.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways? http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8639030.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8639030.page GMT Invisibility fixed by working both ways?
 Desubot wrote:
 Tactical_Spam wrote:
 Galef wrote:
Martel732 wrote:
Or make it so attacking ends the spell.

^^^This, so much this!


I already said that...


Ima go ahead and cast greater invisibility thanks? (3.5 joke)

but yeah would be nice if it did end once you attacked or charged. it makes it more specific for assault units to get into position to do things or positioning troops for better shots. instead of the auto i win spell.



Greater invis should be 7 or 8 warp charges. ]]> http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8639266.page http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/689737/8639266.page GMT