biccat wrote:...why the hell would you get a degree in biomedicine (I assume you mean biomedical engineering) and then go into freaking civil engineering? What the hell kind of a career path is that?

It's so he can poison Jimmy Hoffa and hide the body in the concrete of Giant's Stadium in NJ.

biccat wrote:

Da Boss wrote:But hot damn, if you've made it even to Uni with your views, that's hilarious and I'm much more inclined to consider you a troll.

People with unpopular views shouldn't get admitted to Uni? That's an awesome opinion.

o0shotty0o wrote:Yeah im starting in september im doing a b-eng in biomed and phd in civil , you never heared of people with big ambitions ?

...why the hell would you get a degree in biomedicine (I assume you mean biomedical engineering) and then go into freaking civil engineering? What the hell kind of a career path is that?

Aaaahhh Biccat, did I SAY that people with unpopular views shouldn't be admitted to Uni?
I think I didn't. But if you want to take it that way, sure, I don't mind.

o0shotty0o wrote:

Melissia wrote:I'm gonna move the gun discussion to a new thread. We haven't had one in a while.

Get back in the kitchen hehehehhehehehehe , sorry its late and a bit tired

Oh dear. Oh dear Oh dear.

Everyone get to the minimum safe distance. This bad boy's gonna blow.

Either way I have to say this is one of the most successful trolls in DakkaDakka history. I'm surprised at how many of you got baited.

Da Boss wrote:Aaaahhh Biccat, did I SAY that people with unpopular views shouldn't be admitted to Uni?
I think I didn't. But if you want to take it that way, sure, I don't mind.

You find it "hilarious" that he "made it even to Uni with your views."

I'm not sure how else to take that.

Cheesecat wrote:Either way I have to say this is one of the most successful trolls in DakkaDakka history. I'm surprised at how many of you got baited.

There's a perverse pleasure in it, I must admit.

Oh Humanity.

Nighty night, Shotty. I'm going to bed to have relations involving the butt with a transvestite, my girlfriend, and a black, atheist man. I'm going to tell them all about you and how right you are.

Be back tommorow, BYE!!!!!11!!one!!

It's my trusting nature. It always ends this way.

(Well this one time it ended with me being chased out of a wedding, but that's a much more embarassing story)

Melissia wrote:I'm gonna move the gun discussion to a new thread. We haven't had one in a while.

Link?

Chowderhead wrote:

biccat wrote:...why the hell would you get a degree in biomedicine (I assume you mean biomedical engineering) and then go into freaking civil engineering? What the hell kind of a career path is that?

It's so he can poison Jimmy Hoffa and hide the body in the concrete of Giant's Stadium in NJ.

To become a coastal engineer

Da Boss wrote:It's my trusting nature. It always ends this way.

(Well this one time it ended with me being chased out of a wedding, but that's a much more embarassing story)

Oh, do tell us.

o0shotty0o wrote:

Melissia wrote:I'm gonna move the gun discussion to a new thread. We haven't had one in a while.

Get back in the kitchen hehehehhehehehehe , sorry its late and a bit tired

And the hits just keep on coming... ...

biccat wrote:

Da Boss wrote:Aaaahhh Biccat, did I SAY that people with unpopular views shouldn't be admitted to Uni?
I think I didn't. But if you want to take it that way, sure, I don't mind.

You find it "hilarious" that he "made it even to Uni with your views."

I'm not sure how else to take that.

Howabout as written? I find it hilarious that someone with such an inflexible, unreasonable outlook could have made it into university. I don't care if he does well or not, hell, he can end up Dean for all I care, but I find it hilarious.

Honestly, I meant what I wrote. I usually do.

o0shotty0o wrote:

Chowderhead wrote:

biccat wrote:...why the hell would you get a degree in biomedicine (I assume you mean biomedical engineering) and then go into freaking civil engineering? What the hell kind of a career path is that?

It's so he can poison Jimmy Hoffa and hide the body in the concrete of Giant's Stadium in NJ.

To become a coastal engineer

Coastal engineer?

Well, good luck with that.

The absurdity of the British education system continues to impress.

Also, anyone who believes homosexuality is a choice or genetic is being silly. The human mind is a hell of a lot more complicated than that.

See!? This is the kind of thing I'm talking about.

Dammit, biccat, you're supposed to be a gun-waving, Muslim-hating, gay-bashing ideologue!

Rational statements in a political debate, what is this world coming to?

Shotty, how big was the dildo? Also, what color was it? How did he get to the hospital? Did he drive himself or did he need an ambulance? These are questions for you to think about.

Ahh looks like ive lost myself in all this hate .

Let me regain my thoughts (with the help of coffae)


It seems to me that from the dawn of creation man has become an unpredicdable race , and hence are subjected to perversions of the mind and body.

Now , as we know humans are not perfect , becaus we derive from a primal subspecies during that time our mind was not "able"to decide on what is and what is not perfect .

And during this "primal" time and as our mind was evolving it was inevitible that these perversions were made manifest .

What are these perversions that were made manifest during our primal evolution ? Good question .

Well as we explored our enviroment due to our primal mind we "experimented" which was a good thing but also a bad thing.

Becaus as we experimented we found out how to use tools and build .

But we also due to our primal evolving mind had sex with the same sex .

Which led to the degredation of our civilisation .

By studying this evidence we can concur that our civilization would of been alot better of ,

And that gay people revolt me .

That's the thing, homosexuality is proven to have genetic influences. Influences is the key word here-- we are products of both nature and nurture.

As for how homosexuality keeps going despite the fact that homosexuals typically don't reproduce? Well for one, not everyone who has the genetics would necessarily be homosexual because of societal influences. How many husbands find out they're gay later in life, after having children and being married to a lovely wife? Quite a few, actually.

But that said, I'd have to bring up the issue of Drepanocytosis, IE sickle cell anaemia. It's obviously a very deadly and unwanted gene, right? And yet, it's actually favorable to have a dominant normal gene and a recessive sickle cell gene, because it makes the person immune to malaria and some other similar diseases. So the gene provides a trade-off. Homosexuality genes, as it were (it's a large set of them rather than a single gene), have a similar status in human genetics, albeit homosexuality itself isn't actually any more lethal than heterosexuality barring societal bigotry, but it does mean that if someone embraces it they won't likely reproduce, so the same effect genetically.

o0shotty0o wrote:Let me regain my thoughts (with the help of coffae)
[snip]

What the hell kind of new age bullgak is this?

o0shotty0o wrote:Ahh looks like ive lost myself in all this hate .

Let me regain my thoughts (with the help of coffae)


It seems to me that from the dawn of creation man has become an unpredicdable race , and hence are subjected to perversions of the mind and body.

Now , as we know humans are not perfect , becaus we derive from a primal subspecies during that time our mind was not "able"to decide on what is and what is not perfect .

And during this "primal" time and as our mind was evolving it was inevitible that these perversions were made manifest .

What are these perversions that were made manifest during our primal evolution ? Good question .

Well as we explored our enviroment due to our primal mind we "experimented" which was a good thing but also a bad thing.

Becaus as we experimented we found out how to use tools and build .

But we also due to our primal evolving mind had sex with the same sex .

Which led to the degredation of our civilisation .

By studying this evidence we can concur that our civilization would of been alot better of ,

And that gay people revolt me .

I let my anger get the best of me. I'll try to be more civilized when talking to a madman.

Melissia wrote:That's the thing, homosexuality is proven to have genetic influences. Influences is the key word here-- we are products of both nature and nurture.

As for how homosexuality keeps going despite the fact that homosexuals typically don't reproduce? Well for one, not everyone who has the genetics would necessarily be homosexual because of societal influences. How many husbands find out they're gay later in life, after having children and being married to a lovely wife? Quite a few, actually.

But that said, I'd have to bring up the issue of Drepanocytosis, IE sickle cell anaemia. It's obviously a very deadly and unwanted gene, right? And yet, it's actually favorable to have a dominant normal gene and a recessive sickle cell gene, because it makes the person immune to malaria and some other similar diseases. So the gene provides a trade-off. Homosexuality genes, as it were (it's a large set of them rather than a single gene), have a similar status in human genetics, albeit homosexuality itself isn't actually any more lethal than heterosexuality barring societal bigotry, but it does mean that if someone embraces it they won't likely reproduce, so the same effect genetically.

o0shotty0o wrote:Let me regain my thoughts (with the help of coffae)
[snip]

What the hell kind of new age bullgak is this?

Perfect , if what you say is correct then since we live in a world where the strong survive and the weak perish , hence the homosexuals are the weakest link . Now ...do we want a weak link in our scociety ?


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Chowderhead wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Ahh looks like ive lost myself in all this hate .

Let me regain my thoughts (with the help of coffae)


It seems to me that from the dawn of creation man has become an unpredicdable race , and hence are subjected to perversions of the mind and body.

Now , as we know humans are not perfect , becaus we derive from a primal subspecies during that time our mind was not "able"to decide on what is and what is not perfect .

And during this "primal" time and as our mind was evolving it was inevitible that these perversions were made manifest .

What are these perversions that were made manifest during our primal evolution ? Good question .

Well as we explored our enviroment due to our primal mind we "experimented" which was a good thing but also a bad thing.

Becaus as we experimented we found out how to use tools and build .

But we also due to our primal evolving mind had sex with the same sex .

Which led to the degredation of our civilisation .

By studying this evidence we can concur that our civilization would of been alot better of ,

And that gay people revolt me .

I let my anger get the best of me. I'll try to be more civilized when talking to a madman.

chowderhead your like a fart that wont leave me alone

Yeah! And homeless people are weak links, too. And poor people. And the mentally handicapped. You know what? So are religious people, because they stand in the way of scientific progress. Get rid of all of 'em!

o0shotty0o wrote:Perfect , if what you say is correct then since we live in a world where the strong survive and the weak perish

We don't. And furthermore, you misunderstand (probably intentionally, as you appear to be a troll)-- the sickle cell anaemia genetics actually provides an ADVANTAGE, through the heterogeneous combination providing immunity to malaria. It's not a weak link.

Homosexuality, genetically speaking, actually has advantages to society, precisely BECAUSE they don't reproduce.

Also, without precognitive powers, we cannot determine which mutations are advantageous and which are not.

o0shotty0o wrote:

Melissia wrote:That's the thing, homosexuality is proven to have genetic influences. Influences is the key word here-- we are products of both nature and nurture.

As for how homosexuality keeps going despite the fact that homosexuals typically don't reproduce? Well for one, not everyone who has the genetics would necessarily be homosexual because of societal influences. How many husbands find out they're gay later in life, after having children and being married to a lovely wife? Quite a few, actually.

But that said, I'd have to bring up the issue of Drepanocytosis, IE sickle cell anaemia. It's obviously a very deadly and unwanted gene, right? And yet, it's actually favorable to have a dominant normal gene and a recessive sickle cell gene, because it makes the person immune to malaria and some other similar diseases. So the gene provides a trade-off. Homosexuality genes, as it were (it's a large set of them rather than a single gene), have a similar status in human genetics, albeit homosexuality itself isn't actually any more lethal than heterosexuality barring societal bigotry, but it does mean that if someone embraces it they won't likely reproduce, so the same effect genetically.

o0shotty0o wrote:Let me regain my thoughts (with the help of coffae)
[snip]

What the hell kind of new age bullgak is this?

Perfect , if what you say is correct then since we live in a world where the strong survive and the weak perish , hence the homosexuals are the weakest link . Now ...do we want a weak link in our scociety ?

You are a Nazi. I have no question of this. Please leave this place before I physically harm my computer.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Da Boss wrote:Also, without precognitive powers, we cannot determine which mutations are advantageous and which are not.

People with Sickle Cell Anemia are immune to Malaria.

Actually it's not JUST people with it, but carriers (people with one dominant normal gene and one recessive SCA gene-- they don't actually have SCA themselves) that are immune to malaria.

Melissia wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Perfect , if what you say is correct then since we live in a world where the strong survive and the weak perish

We don't.

We dont ? so what if goodlooking man gets a job that an ugly guy applied for but thay have the same qualification that ugly guy cant get any money to feed himself and so dies out of starvation

Same happens all over the place like in nature the bigest and strongest male gets the female . so others die without carring on thier genes .

Melissia wrote:Actually it's not JUST people with it, but carriers (people with one dominant normal gene and one recessive SCA gene-- they don't actually have SCA themselves) that are immune to malaria.

Huh, didn't know that. Guess you learn something new everyday.

Uh, I know all about sickle cell. I teach a whole series of classes based around it.

I was angling towards the point that we cannot predict which traits will be useful in the future, since we cannot predict future conditions.

o0shotty0o wrote:

Melissia wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Perfect , if what you say is correct then since we live in a world where the strong survive and the weak perish

We don't.

We dont ? so what if goodlooking man gets a job that an ugly guy applied for but thay have the same qualification that ugly guy cant get any money to feed himself and so dies out of starvation

Same happens all over the place like in nature the bigest and strongest male gets the female . so others die without carring on thier genes .

Because there's only one job ever that one person can ever get, amirite?


Also, you live in fething France. FRANCE. Who the hell starves to death in France? Don't you guys have like crazy expansive social programs that make the American left-wingers look like heartless corporate bastards?

o0shotty0o wrote:

Melissia wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Perfect , if what you say is correct then since we live in a world where the strong survive and the weak perish

We don't.

We dont ?

Nope. If it was "the strong survive" we'd not have society to begin with. Society itself provides protection to those whom are weaker so that they can provide services and produce goods that they would be unable to provide if society does not exist. Indeed, because of the nature of our society, many strong and/or talented people are held back by those whom are born into wealth.

Da Boss wrote:Uh, I know all about sickle cell. I teach a whole series of classes based around it.

I was angling towards the point that we cannot predict which traits will be useful in the future, since we cannot predict future conditions.

Ah. I see. I have to agree with you there, but a Abortion Addiction trait is what I find sexiest in a woman. So we have that for future helpful traits.

You are a Nazi. I have no question of this. Please leave this place before I physically harm my computer.



Do us all a favor.

Chowderhead wrote:

Melissia wrote:Actually it's not JUST people with it, but carriers (people with one dominant normal gene and one recessive SCA gene-- they don't actually have SCA themselves) that are immune to malaria.

Huh, didn't know that. Guess you learn something new everyday.

Hmm, some of us do...others..well they seem quite content to wallow about in their idiocy...

Shotty is scottish, he's just in France on holidays.

o0shotty0o wrote:Do us all a favor.

And do what.

DO WHAT.

Chowderhead wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Do us all a favor.

And do what.

DO WHAT.

Harm your computer, I would assume.

coolyo294 wrote:

Chowderhead wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Do us all a favor.

And do what.

DO WHAT.

Harm your computer, I would assume.

Snap

o0shotty0o wrote:

coolyo294 wrote:

Chowderhead wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Do us all a favor.

And do what.

DO WHAT.

Harm your computer, I would assume.

Snap

You know what, I did. You just broke me, Shotty. Broke me.

I'm leaving Dakka for a while. I'll be back on when this idiot has left us.

OK, time for some Shotty logic (U C WUT I DID THERE?)


I sneak up behind you, and stab you in the neck, and steal your wallet.


Obviously, I did nothing wrong and you deserved to die, or else you would've had better senses and been more aware and I would've been unable to kill you.

And we shall wait, Chowder. We shall wait.

o0shotty0o wrote:

You know what, I did. You just broke me, Shotty. Broke me.

o0shotty0o wrote:

You know what, I did. You just broke me, Shotty. Broke me.

This is going in my sig for all eternity.


I am most pleased

Chowder is pissed at you. I would start running now.

o0shotty0o wrote:


This is going in my sig for all eternity.


I am most pleased

Penetration. How romantic.

Whats he going to do ? pm me to death ? lol

No. He will hunt you down. There is no place you can run, no place you can hide. No matter what you do, he will find you.

LordofHats wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:I wonder how Ahtman is going to react when he comes back to this thread.

Like me he'll probably wonder how it ended up being ten pages long lol

No, he will chuckle approvingly.

o0shotty0o wrote:Whats he going to do ? pm me to death ? lol

Ah, so not only an ignorant homophobe...but an internet tough guy who only expounds his vile crap due to the fact he's aware he's safe and snug behind a keyboard...you just keep scoring those points don't you twinkles?

FITZZ wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Whats he going to do ? pm me to death ? lol

Ah, so not only an ignorant homophobe...but an internet tough guy who only expounds his vile crap due to the fact he's aware he's safe and snug behind a keyboard...you just keep scoring those points don't you twinkles?

Vile crap ? your quite a touchy fellow arn`t you ? nothing i have said has offended anyone . im allowed to say my point of view. "twinkles"

FITZZ wrote:.... twinkles?

Automatically Appended Next Post:

o0shotty0o wrote:
Vile crap ? your quite a touchy fellow arn`t you ? nothing i have said has offended anyone . im allowed to say my point of view. "twinkles"

Strangely, one can be offended by the points of view held by others. Hence therms "racist", "antisemite", and "homophobe".

Homophobe is not a word ...

o0shotty0o wrote:

FITZZ wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Whats he going to do ? pm me to death ? lol

Ah, so not only an ignorant homophobe...but an internet tough guy who only expounds his vile crap due to the fact he's aware he's safe and snug behind a keyboard...you just keep scoring those points don't you twinkles?

Vile crap ? your quite a touchy fellow arn`t you ? nothing i have said has offended anyone . im allowed to say my point of view. "twinkles"

Yep,I'm very touchy when I read post calling Homosexuals " perverse and unnatural", and if you think that nothing you've said has offended anyone...well then your dumber than you appear to be..
Of course your allowed your point of view...just as others are allowed to disagree with it.

I was about to make a comment on how they should really put a button on posts that allows for easy ignoring of users rather than having to go on their profile pages and blocking them that way but then I noticed there is one.

It's too early for me.

o0shotty0o wrote:Homophobe is not a word ...

Merriam-Webster would like to have a word with you.

And the word is "Homophobe".

Ok well my point of view is that your point of view is a load of vile crap .

And my view is that your view is a vile load of crap.

o0shotty0o wrote:Ok well my point of view is that your point of view is a load of vile crap .

My viewpoint is that you do not seem to understand when to just stop.

I will leave Dakka Dakka for 3 days. I will still be online, just as a monitor. If I see stuff I dislike, I'm out for good. During this time, I will not respond to PM's, nor do RP's (Sorry FITZZ)

See you all in 3 days. I hope.

So we agree then finaly

o0shotty0o wrote:So we agree then finaly

WE WILL NEVER AGREE.

Aww, c'mon chowder, don't let this moronic prick drive you away permanently. Put him on ignore and move on.

o0shotty0o wrote:Ok well my point of view is that your point of view is a load of vile crap .

Of course it is, someone of your obvious intelligence ( ) would clearly see accepting others as somehow "vile"...you really should try surfing the Klan forums twinkles...I'm sure you'd find a lot more "like minded people" there.

Chowderhead wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Ok well my point of view is that your point of view is a load of vile crap .

My viewpoint is that you do not seem to understand when to just stop.

I will leave Dakka Dakka for 3 days. I will still be online, just as a monitor. If I see stuff I dislike, I'm out for good. During this time, I will not respond to PM's, nor do RP's (Sorry FITZZ)

See you all in 3 days. I hope.

Don't give him the power to get you this worked up. he lives in a dark little place.
we know he's wrong. and in the not too distant future he'll realize it too. or just stay in his dark little place....

I'm really, really tempted to sink to Shotty's level right about now, but I won't, because I am better than him on every conceivable level, as is everyone else in this thread who isn't him.

I'm wondering why no mods have stepped in and banned this guy yet...if they don't know someone should tell them...he's amusing but this is starting to get old fast...

alarmingrick wrote:

Chowderhead wrote:

o0shotty0o wrote:Ok well my point of view is that your point of view is a load of vile crap .

My viewpoint is that you do not seem to understand when to just stop.

I will leave Dakka Dakka for 3 days. I will still be online, just as a monitor. If I see stuff I dislike, I'm out for good. During this time, I will not respond to PM's, nor do RP's (Sorry FITZZ)

See you all in 3 days. I hope.

Don't give him the power to get you this worked up. he lives in a dark little place.
we know he's wrong. and in the not too distant future he'll realize it too. or just stay in his dark little place....

Amen..

o0shotty0o wrote:Homophobe is not a word ...

Uh, yeah, it is.

You know what you guys got it all wrong ! so here it is for real

Point of view : im not fond of gays

i have being drinking too meany beers tonight and am very tired and bored i need sleep . i have being trolling just a little bit , it wont happen agine , next time ill post my point of view and react in a normal mannor.

Sorry if i pissed a few people of with some stupid posts . I think i just got pulled in by the moment . i sent a pm to chowderface about it .

o0shotty0o wrote:You know what you guys got it all wrong ! so here it is for real

Point of view : im not fond of gays

i have being drinking too meany beers tonight and am very tired and bored i need sleep . i have being trolling just a little bit , it wont happen agine , next time ill post my point of view and react in a normal mannor.

Sorry if i pissed a few people of with some stupid posts . I think i just got pulled in by the moment . i sent a pm to chowderface about it .

No i am serious

Just ignore him. Let's talk about Rick Perry instead.

Because Rick Perry is also trolling, but he actually matters to the world at large given that he is a contender for presidency.

Back on topic: TBH, I don't know a lot about most of the Republican candidates other than I've heard several them (especially Bachmann and Cain and now Perry) say some things I find alarming. But, since I'm not a registered Republican, there's no point in worrying about it now since I can't vote in the primary. Now, when the candidate is selected, I'm going to research that person like a boss. I'm fairly liberal so it's quite unlikely I'll vote for them in any event, but it's not 100% impossible and in any event it'll be good to know what to expect if the candidate wins the election.

I think obama i going to stay president . I think he will have the popular vote in america.

o0shotty0o wrote:I think obama i going to stay president . I think he will have the popular vote in america.

Well, his approval numbers are fairly low, but lots of presidents have had similar approval numbers and still served two terms. Reagan and Clinton spring to mind, though I think as of this moment right now, Obama's numbers are a little lower than theirs. Carter's numbers were lower still than Obama's, and he only served one term. It really depends on who ends up being the Republican candidate and then any third party spoilers who show up, for example, Ron Paul will probably run as third-party candidate and draw away some votes that otherwise would've gone Republican. If Sarah Palin makes an attempt to run as a third party candidate, I think that would guarantee a second term for Obama since the conservative and conservative-leaning independent vote would be too divided. It's what happened in 2000 with Bush vs. Gore. If Ralph Nader hadn't run, many of those votes would've almost certainly gone to Gore and he likely would've won the election.

But really, I'm probably not the best person to speak about politics and political trends. Someone more knowledgeable than me (and preferably unbiased ) should probably speak about this.

o0shotty0o wrote:I think obama i going to stay president . I think he will have the popular vote in america.

Oh, he could certainly win the popular vote, but that doesn't mean he'll win the presidency!

Our system is awesome that way.

As a chaplain aide and as a grand son of a pastor and cousin to a few myself my family dislikes gays.

I Do not. Gays choose their path let them enjoy it. I may not personally enjoy it or like them, but what ever people will be people. People will always get on my nerves mostly the politicians.

On gay marriage I am all for it. But I really wish there was such a thing as straight pride day....

Oh dear.

Anyway

"Congress should have the power to override Supreme Court decisions with a two-thirds vote."

NO just no.
Congress would have too much power. To make laws and to also enforce them through a 2/3 vote? is this guy insane?

"The federal Constitution should define marriage as between one man and one woman in all 50 states. "

No. I would never ever vote for this man. Even if he promised me tax freedom. He is being openly Homophobic by this statement. Of course I do not know what the context is. For all I know he could of said "Or not..."
But until then yada.

"Abortion should be made illegal throughout the country. "

No. People made their desceions. A child is too expensive to care for as a teenager. It would be wrong and stupid and it would just make a repeating pattern in the next generation. If anything improve the sex education as it fails worse than a first date.

"Abolish lifetime tenure for federal judges by amending Article III, Section I of the Constitution."

Yes because this makes alot of sense. Lifetime tenure for federal judges is a privilage and a honor. They do it right. So keep them in office let them teach the next generation of super judges.
There is no good reason to get rid of this.


Of course I will come off as biased as I am a Socialist Independent. :/ But anyway takes apart my post oh well.
Just making my opinions heard. I don't like that many politicians. Mostly because my tutor was biased and was awesomely cool, then one of my friends is biased being a pure strain Republican as his mother works for Bank of America. Anyway....

Rick Perry doesn't sound very good. He's lost my vote.

Asherian Command wrote:On gay marriage I am all for it. But I really wish there was such a thing as straight pride day....

That's called "every day that isn't a gay pride day", I believe.

Heterosexual couples show affection for eachother in public without harassment all the time.

Melissia wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:On gay marriage I am all for it. But I really wish there was such a thing as straight pride day....

That's called "every day that isn't a gay pride day", I believe.

Heterosexual couples show affection for eachother in public without harassment all the time.

Drat. I was wanting a Parade with a float!

Asherian Command wrote:Drat. I was wanting a Parade with a float!

I believe the correct answer here would be "There is. It's every parade float that isn't a gay pride float." or something to that effect.

The greatest parade float of all time, of course, was when Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends Rickrolled the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.

As a side note, I'm wondering where any of the moderators are. This thread got extremely stupid while I was away.

Monster Rain wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:Drat. I was wanting a Parade with a float!

I believe the correct answer here would be "There is. It's every parade float that isn't a gay pride float." or something to that effect.

The greatest parade float of all time, of course, was when Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends Rickrolled the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.

Wait are you serious? I would so Vote for Eduardo for Presidentia!

I just got here too :( SAD FACE


At least eduardo listens to me! And knows how to run america.... I wish imaginary friends could run the US. at least it is better to have a false president than a fake system...

That was hilarious.

Melissia wrote:I wouldn't say I really like any member of the Texas republican party. considering they pretty much stay in power by manipulating redistricting to ridiculous extremes rather than by appealing to the voter.

We dont like you either.

Asherian Command wrote:Wait are you serious? I would so Vote for Eduardo for Presidentia!

Pfft. Eduardo has too much sense to run for president.

Blooregard Q. Kazoo already sounds like a president's name, and he's just enough of a megalomaniac to pull it off.

Love how he complains about Judges not being elected then goes around and wants Senators to be appointed by the House.

MadEdric wrote:Love how he complains about Judges not being elected then goes around and wants Senators to be appointed by the House.

Yeah that troubled me. That gives too much power to congress. That is basically Rome all over again.

Well, without psychotic and inbred Emperors of course.

That better describes the electorate.

Asherian Command wrote:
Yeah that troubled me. That gives too much power to congress. That is basically Rome all over again.

The Roman Republic ultimately obeyed the Consuls, as young Caesar illustrated.

The first rule of politics: the guys with the guns/fists/feet/swords always win.

Monster Rain wrote:

Asherian Command wrote:Wait are you serious? I would so Vote for Eduardo for Presidentia!

Pfft. Eduardo has too much sense to run for president.

Blooregard Q. Kazoo already sounds like a president's name, and he's just enough of a megalomaniac to pull it off.

My this thread has taken some strange twist and turns since it's start.

Are we actually having intelligent discussion again?

Cheesecat wrote:Are we actually having intelligent discussion again?

We are very, very close.

Uh oh! Quick! Someone say something stupid!


Uhm uhm uhm America never went to the moon cuz the moon doesn't exist it was created by the space lizards who control the royal family when the second shooter on the grassy gnoll (yes, the grassy humanoid hyena monster) assassinated John Wilkes Booth on the steps of Congress in 1964!

Connor McKane wrote:

Melissia wrote:I wouldn't say I really like any member of the Texas republican party. considering they pretty much stay in power by manipulating redistricting to ridiculous extremes rather than by appealing to the voter.

We dont like you either.

Sounds like California, New York, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan and Florida in many respects. Gerrymandering is neither new or party specific.

RatBot wrote:Uh oh! Quick! Someone say something stupid!


Uhm uhm uhm America never went to the moon cuz the moon doesn't exist it was created by the space lizards who control the royal family when the second shooter on the grassy gnoll (yes, the grassy humanoid hyena monster) assassinated John Wilkes Booth on the steps of Congress in 1964!

I personally prefer Albatross's conspiracy theory.

"According to Larouche and his minions, the British Empire still exists behind the scenes, pulling the strings. Plus some stuff about Jews and the Queen being an international dope-dealer. Oh, and 9/11? Yeah, we Brits did that, apparently."

Stormrider wrote:Sounds like California, New York, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan and Florida in many respects. Gerrymandering is neither new or party specific.

No, but the ones in Texas have it down to an art form.

Stormrider wrote:Gerrymandering is neither new or party specific.

Don't go introducing facts and logic into the thread, please.

I so enjoy wild, partisan ranting.

Locking thread to sift the wreckage.