ZebioLizard2 wrote:

DeadlySquirrel wrote:Rule 64: If it exists, there is a female version of it. The SoB are pretty much it.

That's rule 63, and no that does not apply to sisters of battle.

Fra Charmelandro wrote:I recall an article in WD once criticising conversions where an arm is raised to throw something with no corresponding movement in the shoulder. I find that rich coming from GW where nobody seems to have an appreciation of anatomy, e.g. the whole SM range where part of the induction process seems to be dislocation of the hips and usually the shoulders too. I also struggle with the horrendously ugly ogryns. What is that single tombstone sticking out his mouth supposed to do? Why is he carrying a small furry animal under his right arm? What injury did he suffer to mess up the musculature round his left shoulder so badly?

Cryonicleech wrote:Those Old Ogryns are fantastic! The new ones are cool too, but...

Either way,


Poor old sod. He's fantastic in Necromunda, but couldn't they have given him ANYthing else? A Chainsword at the least...

bmoleski wrote:I'm surprised no one has said Abaddon. I love the character, and his unit in the game, but his model is just terrible. The finecast version is many steps forward but I wish they would've just re-sculpted him instead.

Movac wrote:

LunaHound wrote:Can you imagine .... these are the only plastic IG infantry kit before they made plastic Cadians?

Your opinion is wrong.

AnUnearthlyChilde wrote:

the only thing that needs to be said, is "Floating Hemorrhoids"

bmoleski wrote:

AnUnearthlyChilde wrote:

the only thing that needs to be said, is "Floating Hemorrhoids"

They may be terrible models...but if you saw a cluster of floating explosive hemorrhoids drifting your way.....you'd probably crap your pants. I sure would.

blood reaper wrote:I think the only major problem is that the Spore mines design makes them so fragile they snap with ease.

AnUnearthlyChilde wrote:

blood reaper wrote:I think the only major problem is that the Spore mines design makes them so fragile they snap with ease.

Especially now they are finecast :S

Good job I don't use the itchy bleeders anymore

CthuluIsSpy wrote:

nomsheep wrote:

Ratius wrote:What on Earth is that Nomsheep?

That my good sir is a *shudder* squat hovercar.

Nom

...and why do we want the squats back, again?

Veteran Sergeant wrote:They really don't look out of place at all. I have some Squat models that stuck around for my Imperial Guard army, and they fit in just fine. The hate for Squats is much like the hate for the Ultramarines. Mostly unfounded.

Veteran Sergeant wrote:

CthuluIsSpy wrote:

nomsheep wrote:

Ratius wrote:What on Earth is that Nomsheep?

That my good sir is a *shudder* squat hovercar.

Nom

...and why do we want the squats back, again?

Kinda stupid to compare models from the earliest days of Rogue Trader with the modern incarnations.

RT era had some pretty stupid Space Marine, Imperial Guard, Eldar, and Chaos models too. It isn't like anybody is clamoring to write them out of the universe for twenty to twenty five year old figures.

The reason the Squats look silly sometimes is that the game was much sillier back then. It would have been perfectly possible for the Squats line of models to have evolved like all the rest of them did.

BlapBlapBlap wrote:

Lots of people will hate me for this, but to me it just looks like the mother of the Dreadknight. Seriously, it looks like a rock could take it down.